I have said before if I were anyone interesting or important and H pitched up as the royal for an event I was at, I would be bleeping insulted after what he has said/done.BIB- perhaps. But that doesn’t mean the public will forgive him. Much as the miscreants would wish it otherwise, the public have long memories, and can hold a grudge for a long time. Perhaps he does have the right to come back. Perhaps his family will forgive him, especially if he sincerely apologises and means it. I don’t believe he has it in him to do that, but still…
The public are not likely to forgive and forget though. The RF need to understand that. The Hazno ship has sailed. The scales have fallen from our eyes and we’ve seen who he really is, and what he really thinks of us. You can’t put that genie back in the bottle. I’m running out of cliches here…
Harry and Meghan #161 Was the 16 bath Mansion ever their home? Are they together or living alone?
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I am finding it very concerning that even Lady C is talking about the possibility that PWB could / should be forgiven or allowed back into life as a royal.
How can anyone even ask questions about whether he could or could not be accepted back?
It's a categoric NO from me and I imagine the vast majority of the British public. He has made his choices, there is no going back publicly.
The Royal Family will definitely fall if PWB is 'welcomed' back.
He is a f'ing ugly souled hole & every time I see his face I get the rage
Even as someone unimportant I would be insulted. If he turned up I would get my coat.
Quite right. Does it ever occur to them that it can't possibly be true that they are stalked, hounded and papped, because nobody knows where they live? They are never seen, apart from photoshopped pics or staged shots of a totally unrecognisable Minge wrapped head to toe in Bedouin blankets. Arranged by them. Every single time. Who do they think they're kidding?
"Archie is 3 and has been attending school. According to a new article from The Mirror, Harry and Meghan chose to not have Archie attend the All Saints by the Sea Episcopal School, (5 miles from Montyshitto) which celebrities in the area often send their kids to. Instead, the Sussexes opted for a nursery further away but offers a special curriculum."
He's not. If he existed he would be 3 in May. So they "hide" him far away, and don't specify the nursery of course. At St Fark's By The Sea Agape Nursery, children as young as 2 dig weeds and learn CRT and the perils of climate change and misinformstion in the media.
However, we're reassured that these children are "unaware that Ffark and his parents have Royal Blood!" Unbelievable! Surely everyone there can see the grace, dignity, royal bearing and sheer class of the bewigged Ho?
Yeah, you can see a thin white outline around Meg, where she was cut out of another pic forr 1 thing But I’d like to see her eyes a ltitle cross eyed. More fitting imo, and maybe a nice little set of horns.Ah no she does look manic in earlier versions of the same pic, the original picture agency must have done it to her, not the BBC
Why Harry and Meghan's comeback picture was so perfect
Whether you view their break from The Firm as a brave and necessary move or a have-their-cake-and-eat-it strop, the Sussex ability to dazzle is uncontestedwww.standard.co.uk
I think it was said at the time that this particular set of pics was always heavily manipulated, I think the rain was either added or enhanced
She might have got it from Richard Eden. No mention of Smeg returning though.
A couple of reactions from Twatter
Last edited:
I have joined also, quite a few of the twitter people there.
I’m starting to wonder if Ffark (if indeed he exists at all) has some kind of impairment. Being hidden away, substituting someone else’s child, all the photoshopping. I’m starting to think they are ashamed of him. You know if they had a child who was less than ‘perfect’ (in their eyes) they would be mortified.
I guess it depends on the willingness to ignore personal values and biases.
And then being willing to address the taboo element of liking someone /something and then being able to point out the things which are a mistake.
It was unnecessary to create ''mystique'' around the fact that the RF members are Britain's unofficial trade and arms dealers on State level.
It was also unnecessary to create ''mystique'' around the fact that nothing comes from nothing and that even their own money wouldn't cover what is needed, so there is a necessity for fundraisers and donations.
But there always was the element (Charles more than other members) of claiming things as ''his.''
Regardless what it was, the hierarchy of the RF created problems by order of precedence which never allowed the ''lower member'' to outshine the ''higher member.''
There is nothing wrong with hierarchy, but I think it would have been better if the hierarchy applied only to official events and actions, rather than the manipulations of media time/exposure which was allowed/allocated to ''lower members,'' due to fear of ''overshadowing.''
It is universally believed that the ''popularity'' of certain members(ignoring their actions) is based on the hierarchy and is natural, in reality it is or better was, in the past based on suppression of the potential popularity of ''lower members'' to prevent the overshadowing of ''higher members.''
The above is also about Lady C's comment on Princess Michael whose negative reputation in the initial stages of her appearance on the RF stage, is a clever plot of well placed journalists, well placed lies and stories(things out of her control, example her fathers past) the fact that she was a magnificent public speaker (and someone much higher wasn't ) which was disliked, and that at a certain point a person does what I would also do:" duck it, it doesn't matter how well I do, so I'm going to retaliate and damage."
The above is relevant in the Harkles case, because everyone, myself included hasn't seen a single indicator of the above on Harry.
Harry however was there, he has seen it and is now using it for his own pursuit of fame and money.
And the RF now has a complicated problem, Harry being Charles son, and via the media the claimant of Diana's legacy, which basically can mean yet again(based on current patterns) that Harry gets away with everything, and its obvious how successful his strategy is, by observing the bashing of the other RF members for completely minor things or thing which are out of their control via cleverly placed ''journalism'' and ''sources."
Harry shits on the crown, his shills (or shills from his chosen country) declare Charles racist, shits on the RF, shits on his brother, he commits treason, and/or (breach of contract) leaving Royal duties, he uses the titles/status for self gain and promotion, the consequence ?
Charles is happy with his climate change work, and all that after 4 private jets in 11 days and shiting on Balmoral in favor of Ibiza in the media.
It's a failing strategy because even the other RF members are human, how many events, birthdays, anniversaries are needed to be destroyed, tarnished, hijacked and overshadowed before it impacts someone like Kate?
Where is the ''enough'' reaction?
Why the fear? Does the RF believe that William can't do without Harry?
Optics?
Charles will have Edward, who will be next to William mindset?
Blackmail ?
How many times before self defense?
And then being willing to address the taboo element of liking someone /something and then being able to point out the things which are a mistake.
It was unnecessary to create ''mystique'' around the fact that the RF members are Britain's unofficial trade and arms dealers on State level.
It was also unnecessary to create ''mystique'' around the fact that nothing comes from nothing and that even their own money wouldn't cover what is needed, so there is a necessity for fundraisers and donations.
But there always was the element (Charles more than other members) of claiming things as ''his.''
Regardless what it was, the hierarchy of the RF created problems by order of precedence which never allowed the ''lower member'' to outshine the ''higher member.''
There is nothing wrong with hierarchy, but I think it would have been better if the hierarchy applied only to official events and actions, rather than the manipulations of media time/exposure which was allowed/allocated to ''lower members,'' due to fear of ''overshadowing.''
It is universally believed that the ''popularity'' of certain members(ignoring their actions) is based on the hierarchy and is natural, in reality it is or better was, in the past based on suppression of the potential popularity of ''lower members'' to prevent the overshadowing of ''higher members.''
The above is also about Lady C's comment on Princess Michael whose negative reputation in the initial stages of her appearance on the RF stage, is a clever plot of well placed journalists, well placed lies and stories(things out of her control, example her fathers past) the fact that she was a magnificent public speaker (and someone much higher wasn't ) which was disliked, and that at a certain point a person does what I would also do:" duck it, it doesn't matter how well I do, so I'm going to retaliate and damage."
The above is relevant in the Harkles case, because everyone, myself included hasn't seen a single indicator of the above on Harry.
Harry however was there, he has seen it and is now using it for his own pursuit of fame and money.
And the RF now has a complicated problem, Harry being Charles son, and via the media the claimant of Diana's legacy, which basically can mean yet again(based on current patterns) that Harry gets away with everything, and its obvious how successful his strategy is, by observing the bashing of the other RF members for completely minor things or thing which are out of their control via cleverly placed ''journalism'' and ''sources."
Harry shits on the crown, his shills (or shills from his chosen country) declare Charles racist, shits on the RF, shits on his brother, he commits treason, and/or (breach of contract) leaving Royal duties, he uses the titles/status for self gain and promotion, the consequence ?
Charles is happy with his climate change work, and all that after 4 private jets in 11 days and shiting on Balmoral in favor of Ibiza in the media.
It's a failing strategy because even the other RF members are human, how many events, birthdays, anniversaries are needed to be destroyed, tarnished, hijacked and overshadowed before it impacts someone like Kate?
Where is the ''enough'' reaction?
Why the fear? Does the RF believe that William can't do without Harry?
Optics?
Charles will have Edward, who will be next to William mindset?
Blackmail ?
How many times before self defense?
I'll have a think.Can I have a special Wiki drawing please?
See if I can come up with a new one.
Bear with me.
Your version of @JAR21 avi hugging a huge encyclopedia/book with Wiki on the cover ?
I'm sure you can do fantastic on your own, just joking.
every word of this.
I think the RF were the first to ever say no to her demands, we know she was Daddy's little (spoilt & petulant) princess, & she had a good run climbing the p-ladder without being kicked off...
This is why they drive us all bananas.
Everything isn't enough for this greedy bint. Zero humility. The FIRST thing that comes to mind is "Greedy greedy makes a hungry puppy... " The story of a greedy pup that sees his reflection in a pond and while making a grab for the dog/bone loses his. Karma is coming. After leaving the BRF and the safety of the UK no place in the world of is truly safe. Privacy? HAH. Never. No amount fame or fortune will satisfy these two; those poor kids. the Sixes are hopeless souls devoid of any real purpose... just merching and ho-ing their way into a pitiful materialistic existence. I hardly call that THRIVING.
Apologies if there's a similar post as I am very behind.
P.s. Where's Yeltsin? I will try and listen to the BBC thing tomorrow. My cel is dead and I don't have VPN at the mo.
Last edited:
"but offers a special curriculum" definitely hints at that doesn't it? The local school seems perfectly fine. They're pre-school for gawd's sake, playing is a big part of learning and developing life skills at that age. They don't need "special curriculums" unless Archie is showing a keen interest in quantum physics already...or there is a developmental issue. Or perhaps Dim & Dimmer didn't crack the entry criteria for Fark. C'mon, they'd give their eye teeth to be in the same social circles as the other local celebs, and as we know that's how many parent friendships are formed.
That's what I thought! Sagging raw Richmonds. UGH.
"If" Fark had some sort of physical/developmental disability, the bint might actually get some respect from me if she were to own it, bring awareness to & champion said disability. That would be a good & valid platform for her & might actually show her "compassionate" side, & that she actually gives a damn about others.
Let's hope that its not the case and that Fark is fine - he's got enough to deal with having that pair of vapid, entitled, duplicitous twunts as parents.
Let's hope that its not the case and that Fark is fine - he's got enough to deal with having that pair of vapid, entitled, duplicitous twunts as parents.
I agree with you that there's no proof that Fark exists, but assuming he's not a figment of their imagination this story is bloody nonsense isn't it? The local nursery isnt good enough despite all those other celebrities sending their kids there
Minge was probably scared that nobody would recognise her and amongst celebrities she's not going to be the focus of attention
The other school offers extra tree hugging and compassion classes. He's not even 3 yet
still there's nothing to worry about, his future is full of gender neutral toys and books like this....
- Status