Sadly, this person doesn’t have all her facts straight though. William and Cathrine only used NottCott for 2 years as their London base, while spending most of their time in Bodorgan Hall (it was never a tiny cottage) in Anglesey. It was always just a temporary set up. Catherine also has been in the line of fire for her spending habits. From the start and not undeserved.Interesting post from Deanna on Quora regarding the finances of the Harkles:
'Prince Harry was well known for his frugality throughout his adult life. He didn't spend much money on clothes, and he was very happy to live in Nott Cottage within Kensington Palace when Prince William vacated that space with Catherine for their more palatial place. Harry didn’t needlessly spend money to look good or to impress people; he was happy, joking, funny Harry.
Everyone knew he was a prince, so Harry didn’t splash out on decorating or on new clothes for each day. The very wealthy people who come from wealthy families and are aristocratic understand their wealth is in their stunningly large mansions and country homes. They have paintings worth more than some people’s homes. The very wealthy own land, and they are content to reuse the faded rugs from decades ago. Harry comes from this. Harry played the wealthy sport of kings: polo; he enjoyed the 50,000 acres that Queen Elizabeth owns surrounding her beloved Balmoral Castle. This is his life.
That was his life. When he decided to marry the rather middle class American who knew nothing about the British way of life, Harry likely didn’t anticipate Meghan’s appetite for spending money. She was new to this lifestyle, and Meghan wanted to spend the way she thought Catherine did. (Catherine watches how much she spends by the way.)
Harry, by not marrying a wealthy British woman, wound up trying to rein in his wife’s insatiable appetite for the good life as she saw it. Harry’s aristocratic friends laughed at Meghan. She tried too hard. Nott Cott was good enough for Catherine to live in with the love of her life, Prince William, but Meghan only saw their 20 room “apartment” at Kensington Palace and wanted to get out of the tiny apartment (as written in Finding Freedom). That’s when she asked to live in Windsor Castle, and nobody in the family asks for a place. They are given as gifts, and Harry forgot to tell his rich, new wife the niceties of dealing with royal life and the Queen.
I think Harry understands Meghan is flying through his inheritance money and the huge sums given to the couple from Prince Charles. Why Meghan’s first year as a royal cost over $1,000,000 for her clothing alone, and most of it was maternity wear, which she didn't bother to rewear when pregnant with Lili. Word is Meghan had a deal with her friend to resell the clothes Meghan wore, so they could split the profits. Maybe the Dior maternity dress that cost a whopping $90,000 is being worn by some rich housewife in New Jersey.
Meghan likes to spend money on things. She wanted a mansion with sixteen bathrooms. Why? I’m sure Harry wasn’t happy with that purchase price, and they could have lived as lovers for life in a medium sized home near LA. A $5,000,000 home would have been better than a $14,000,000 home. The upkeep alone would cost one million a year at their Montecito mansion. At least.
Then there is her need for private jets. And Meghan is wild about security. It makes her look important to have bodyguards around her, except they don't need them in America. Nobody is chasing them down for their photographs anymore, so Meghan even spends cash on private photographers. Add in her three PR teams, which she kept when she was a royal living in Britain, too. Did Meghan not trust the Brits to make her look good? Because they certainly did!
Harry has a cash flow problem on his hands.
He is frugal, and that’s why we’ll spot him wearing wrinkled clothing such as that ubiquitous grey suit along with his shoes with a hole in the bottom. Meghan is in new outfits all the time as she doesn't recycle them, which all of us do. Wearing the same clothes over and over is something even the royals do.
Meghan missed the memo on that one, too. I don’t know what Harry is going to do when they run out of money, because Prince Charles is fuming at the couple. So I wouldn't be thinking he’d help them out in their wealthy lifestyle now. Who’s left? The Queen? Oprah? George Clooney? Gayle King?
Harry is either in so much love with Meghan that he’s blind to her spending, or he is trembling over upsetting his bride over their finances. Either way Harry is not making his wife live a more frugal life. As their relevancy wanes, it would make sense to move and reduce their spending on attorneys and public relations teams. The couple needs to live within their means, as we all do. And I don’t think Meghan understands by not being a good royal and staying she lost a great job and all the perks.
I wonder how long they have left to live in this ostentatious manner.'
I do agree that the peerage has a distinctive spending code sometimes. And you just cannot copy it. Wearing your grandfathers Barbour jacket with several patched up holes while driving an unbelievable expensive (vintage) sports car. A certain habitus immediately identifies you as in or out. The social code is strong, even in countries where peerage doesn’t exist officially anymore. But the old circles still hold.
And while a absolutely agree that M shows all the signs of new money/Hollywood behaviour, I think H is is fully on board and loves it. He was never frugal. His brother and sister and law aren’t either. Even Charles isn’t. Repeating a dress doesn’t make you frugal. Moving a tennis court a couple of metres for a better view isn’t frugal. That’s just BS. And why should they? They are filthy rich and get richer by the second. H just has the problem now that he is confronted with the costs of things and no money miraculously turning up. W&K balance a fine line and mostly succeed in making people think they do not spend hundreds of thousands unnecessarily. They really came through with their PR strategy. As did Charles. H&M are too daft and seemingly don’t understand that they are not entitled to wealth. Them whining about being cut off financially is hilarious. The BRF knows they are privileged and while they won’t give it up without a fight they at least work their PR in a clever way to appease. H&M are so woke, they don’t realise they are part of the problem and cannot understand why they get a kick while his family doesn’t.