Harry youre a twit
Yer missus aint all that
You both moan like duck
And enjoy raking up muck
In Del Monte, youre sat.
Yer missus aint all that
You both moan like duck
And enjoy raking up muck
In Del Monte, youre sat.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
He really is an ugly gremlin and after his latest stunt with his twit of a Husband and Pearl the Pwincess girl, he should be cold shouldered, another washed up has been looking for glory..
Pair of pathetic, posturing ponces.
I reckon when he dies there will be a lot of unsavoury stuff about him coming out
Can I vote twice for this?
Queen needs to change his title to the Dook of Barnard Castle.
The original toilet seat story is the Queen Mother, she was the original owner of the first toilet seat, real or fictional.
Media repeat.
The toothpaste is because a device is attached to the tube, to squeeze even the last bit out, the tube is not standing independent.
Diana didn't invent the "Firm" it was King George 6.
The exact original statement is:"
" Ours is not family, its a Firm. "
Diana's cufflinks lie, among hundreds falls flatt on its nose, when learning that Charles attended a State Funeral of a terrorist victim once wearing the Order of Dame Commander, (not Knight) which he also has.
The valet did it.
If he had known what trouble Haz would be he would have drowned him at birth and said to Diana "Better luck next time , eh luv?"
Something similar has been mentioned on Harry Markle:
A Memoir Is Added To The Circus Of Vanities And Vampires
Back in January 2021,( I was contacted with information that Harry had ‘written’ a book with the aid of a ghostwriter, and that it would be a memoir that specifically would focus on the…
harrymarkle.wordpress.com
If he does end up going along with this, I suspect he's finished for good. He might repeat his mother's words by saying that he thinks Charles is unfit to be King, and he might mention William being unfit too by saying they're both "trapped". Lady C did mention that this was essentially HW's plan, to ensure that Harry is made regent to George when the Queen dies so they have to get rid of the first 2 in the line of succession.
Sadly, all through this media frenzy about Hazzno's book, christening, Lilibet name, Pearl, Jubilee, the picture İ have in my mind is of Smeg smirking with dupers delight - she will be loving all this publicity, good or bad, like oxygen she lives for it. She just lights the touchpaper these days and feeds off Hazzno's petulant outbursts. Self-serving skidmarkles.
Shame he wasn't the afterbirth and incinerated
TBH if I could take my toilet seat when i travel I would
So Charles and Camilla are going to cop the brunt of it? If that's the case, I'm not sure that Charles will have a long life after it's release
He must be so devastated along with grieving for the loss of PP.
I seem to break toilet seats, my fat arse's fault
Quote: I agree. Removing their titles would just generate another round of hostilities featuring more interviews etc.
Mr. 6 seems to be the Howard Stern of the RF; but the ennui is growing- another day another #6 porky, blah blah blah. The female 6 book was big news which dissolved into the bargain bin, same for ff 1-2. Really, how many people are going to buy a book filled with the lessons learned by mr. thumpy chest? Even if the things do more interviews, how many would watch? What the hell new do either of them have to say.
Mr. 6 seems to be the Howard Stern of the RF; but the ennui is growing- another day another #6 porky, blah blah blah. The female 6 book was big news which dissolved into the bargain bin, same for ff 1-2. Really, how many people are going to buy a book filled with the lessons learned by mr. thumpy chest? Even if the things do more interviews, how many would watch? What the hell new do either of them have to say.
It's been mentioned on here before that Harry pretty much wanted to be like his mother but he just didn't know how to go about it until he met the wife, and I completely agree. He and the wife are both fame-addicts! His ex-girlfriend saying he's "self-obsessed" makes so much sense. He should have just let his mother rest in peace since he's doing more damage to her memory than anyone else.
I just don't get how he can trash his father like that. He's even on record a few years ago saying how grateful he was that he could talk to his dad about anything. Now he's treating Charles like how the wife treats her father.
He already looks so weary behind his smile & his hands seem to be always red & swollen these days it would not surprise me if he is still suffering from covid after effectsSo Charles and Camilla are going to cop the brunt of it? If that's the case, I'm not sure that Charles will have a long life after it's release
Harry Mount in the Daily Telegraph today:
Prince Harry may not be the brightest spark but surely he can see how hypocritical his latest venture appears?
“I’m writing this not as the Prince I was born but as the man I have become,” Harry said, in the statement about his new autobiography… with the sign-off: “Prince Harry, The Duke of Sussex”.
In that one sentence, he encapsulated what many have come to see as the spirit of Harry and Meghan: have your cake and eat it.
To recap, the Sussexes withdrew from royal duties and yet tried unsuccessfully to hold on to their Sussex Royal brand. Prince Harry attacked the press for invasion of his private life. Yet he felt comfortable enough to invite Oprah Winfrey into his backyard – and James Corden on a double-decker tour of LA – to give his side of the story, slanted – so it appeared – against the Royal Family. As the Daily Star claimed, on its front page at the time, “Publicity-shy couple to tell all to Oprah.”
ADVERTISING
The longer this goes on, many of us long to tell Harry, the more ridiculous it looks.
Harry and Meghan during their explosive Oprah interview CREDIT: Reuters
Even with the end of the Sussex Royal brand, Harry seems determined to persist with this idea that now he is his own man: a private self-made individual. But, it seems so obvious to everyone else, he would not be that man or have the success, coverage and money he’s got, without having been born a prince. Or, for that matter, still calling himself a prince – and the Duke of Sussex.
For example, it is clear that it is only as a prince that Harry secured the reputed $20m book deal with Penguin Random House. If he were plain Harry Smith – a Brit living in LA and working at a startup – he would be of no interest to the publishing world.
It’s hard not to conclude that the Sussexes seem to want all the trappings of royalty with none of the boring bits. Just look at the Oprah interview and how concerned the Duchess seemed to be with the lack of a princedom for Archie – not to mention her clear worry at their current lack of security, previously available while they were on royal duties.
It’s difficult not to wonder what Peter Cook would have made of them. In Not Only… But Also, his 1960s series with Dudley Moore, Cook parodied the famous recluse, Greta Garbo. Dressed up as Garbo, he took to the top of a double-decker and shouted at passers-by, through a megaphone, Garbo’s supposed catchphrase, “I want to be alone.”
The difference was Garbo wasn’t a hypocrite: she did want to be alone. She retired from films at the age of 35 and lived till 84 in near-complete seclusion.
Harry and Meghan could have done the same. If they’d retired to a life of quiet domesticity in LA – as many of us assumed they wanted at first – they’d have eventually slipped into obscurity, after the initial fuss died down.
Instead, the pair are barely off our screens, airwaves and now bookshelves. Hardly a week goes by without some new Sussex media venture being announced, from those megabucks deals with Netflix and Spotify to last weekend’s announcement of a family-focused cartoon series for Netflix, called Pearl.
The duchess, its executive producer, said: “Like many girls her age, our heroine Pearl is on a journey of self-discovery as she tries to overcome life’s daily challenges.”
Certainly, she must be hoping Pearl does a lot better than her children’s book, The Bench, which came out earlier this year – and struggled to sell in British bookshops.
The book’s cover had her name as ‘Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex’.
In strict etiquette terms, that’s wrong. She can be the Duchess of Sussex or Meghan – but, as long as she’s married to Harry, she can’t be both.
Still, by using both names, Meg gets all the intimate friendliness she wants to signal to potential buyers, while retaining the status that goes with being a duchess.
The problem is that, so far, the Sussexes haven’t revealed much solid broadcasting or literary talent. The mass attention they crave only goes with royal revelations of the sort they poured out to Oprah Winfrey.
But, when it comes to royal gossip, the Sussexes are feeding off dwindling resources. Living in LA, thousands of miles from Windsor Castle and Buckingham Palace, they are getting decreasing access to the heart of the royal action.
Harry is said to be keen to get back to Britain for a royal christening, attended by the Queen, for Lilibet Diana, his newborn daughter. That would make for a nice, uplifting last chapter in the autobiography – and perhaps be an ideal moment to close the book on the couple’s busy publicity schedule, too.
Prince Harry may not be the brightest spark but surely he can see how hypocritical his latest venture appears?
“I’m writing this not as the Prince I was born but as the man I have become,” Harry said, in the statement about his new autobiography… with the sign-off: “Prince Harry, The Duke of Sussex”.
In that one sentence, he encapsulated what many have come to see as the spirit of Harry and Meghan: have your cake and eat it.
To recap, the Sussexes withdrew from royal duties and yet tried unsuccessfully to hold on to their Sussex Royal brand. Prince Harry attacked the press for invasion of his private life. Yet he felt comfortable enough to invite Oprah Winfrey into his backyard – and James Corden on a double-decker tour of LA – to give his side of the story, slanted – so it appeared – against the Royal Family. As the Daily Star claimed, on its front page at the time, “Publicity-shy couple to tell all to Oprah.”
ADVERTISING
The longer this goes on, many of us long to tell Harry, the more ridiculous it looks.
Harry and Meghan during their explosive Oprah interview CREDIT: Reuters
Even with the end of the Sussex Royal brand, Harry seems determined to persist with this idea that now he is his own man: a private self-made individual. But, it seems so obvious to everyone else, he would not be that man or have the success, coverage and money he’s got, without having been born a prince. Or, for that matter, still calling himself a prince – and the Duke of Sussex.
For example, it is clear that it is only as a prince that Harry secured the reputed $20m book deal with Penguin Random House. If he were plain Harry Smith – a Brit living in LA and working at a startup – he would be of no interest to the publishing world.
It’s hard not to conclude that the Sussexes seem to want all the trappings of royalty with none of the boring bits. Just look at the Oprah interview and how concerned the Duchess seemed to be with the lack of a princedom for Archie – not to mention her clear worry at their current lack of security, previously available while they were on royal duties.
It’s difficult not to wonder what Peter Cook would have made of them. In Not Only… But Also, his 1960s series with Dudley Moore, Cook parodied the famous recluse, Greta Garbo. Dressed up as Garbo, he took to the top of a double-decker and shouted at passers-by, through a megaphone, Garbo’s supposed catchphrase, “I want to be alone.”
The difference was Garbo wasn’t a hypocrite: she did want to be alone. She retired from films at the age of 35 and lived till 84 in near-complete seclusion.
Harry and Meghan could have done the same. If they’d retired to a life of quiet domesticity in LA – as many of us assumed they wanted at first – they’d have eventually slipped into obscurity, after the initial fuss died down.
Instead, the pair are barely off our screens, airwaves and now bookshelves. Hardly a week goes by without some new Sussex media venture being announced, from those megabucks deals with Netflix and Spotify to last weekend’s announcement of a family-focused cartoon series for Netflix, called Pearl.
The duchess, its executive producer, said: “Like many girls her age, our heroine Pearl is on a journey of self-discovery as she tries to overcome life’s daily challenges.”
Certainly, she must be hoping Pearl does a lot better than her children’s book, The Bench, which came out earlier this year – and struggled to sell in British bookshops.
The book’s cover had her name as ‘Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex’.
In strict etiquette terms, that’s wrong. She can be the Duchess of Sussex or Meghan – but, as long as she’s married to Harry, she can’t be both.
Still, by using both names, Meg gets all the intimate friendliness she wants to signal to potential buyers, while retaining the status that goes with being a duchess.
The problem is that, so far, the Sussexes haven’t revealed much solid broadcasting or literary talent. The mass attention they crave only goes with royal revelations of the sort they poured out to Oprah Winfrey.
But, when it comes to royal gossip, the Sussexes are feeding off dwindling resources. Living in LA, thousands of miles from Windsor Castle and Buckingham Palace, they are getting decreasing access to the heart of the royal action.
Harry is said to be keen to get back to Britain for a royal christening, attended by the Queen, for Lilibet Diana, his newborn daughter. That would make for a nice, uplifting last chapter in the autobiography – and perhaps be an ideal moment to close the book on the couple’s busy publicity schedule, too.
Love it - İ couldn't view the telegraph link but bbc.com have pictures.
All following are horses mouth statements by Saint Diana in hronological order(her self, tapes, letters, inteviews, her close friends, and siblings are sources.)
1.Pregnancy with William was terrible I was in a dark place, with Harry was easier, we were the happiest when Harry was born.
2.We were happy when Harry was born, I don't remember the time much, I blurred it out.
3.We were happy, and then Harry was born, it went downhill from there.
4.Harry just happened, I don't know how, it just did.
5.Charles wanted a girl(her astrologer told her so) so he was disapointed
6. Harry was born, and Charles commented that he has "rusty" hair.
7.Harry was born and Charles said :"Oh its even ginger(has red hair) And that's when something inside of me died.
I have a name for the above, it's called a dangerous pathological liar rewriting marital history, to win and inflict damage.
Mental Health?
Nope, mental health problems are not selective, and they are visible in other areas, not just when it suitably damages others.
1.Pregnancy with William was terrible I was in a dark place, with Harry was easier, we were the happiest when Harry was born.
2.We were happy when Harry was born, I don't remember the time much, I blurred it out.
3.We were happy, and then Harry was born, it went downhill from there.
4.Harry just happened, I don't know how, it just did.
5.Charles wanted a girl(her astrologer told her so) so he was disapointed
6. Harry was born, and Charles commented that he has "rusty" hair.
7.Harry was born and Charles said :"Oh its even ginger(has red hair) And that's when something inside of me died.
I have a name for the above, it's called a dangerous pathological liar rewriting marital history, to win and inflict damage.
Mental Health?
Nope, mental health problems are not selective, and they are visible in other areas, not just when it suitably damages others.
That is incredible
Pensioner creates 'knitted Sandringham' of Queen's Norfolk home
Margaret Seaman, 92, from Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, has spent two years working on a 'knitted Sandringham,' which also includes knitted members of the royal family.
- Status