Sorry, wrong link. Hopefully this is correct
Could this be Meghan’s dark secret? I suppose most of you have heard the rumour that Meghan Markle has married not two but three times. ...
Could this be Meghan’s dark secret? I suppose most of you have heard the rumour that Meghan Markle has married not two but three times. Before Prince Harry and her divorced husband Trevor Engelson she is said to have married a lawyer called Joe Giuliano or in full: Joseph Goldberg-Giuliano. Howe...qr.ae
Because they were born to a son of the reigning Monarch, Prince Edwards children were also entitled to use Prince and Princess, but their parents decided not to when they were born. Lady Louise can choose to use the Princess title when she turns eighteen.It’s probably been done to death but can someone remind me why Andrew’s kids are princesses but Edward’s and Anne’s aren’t?
Personally I'm sick of hearing speculation about the fucking statue unveiling. It's just a bloody statue and not remotely important. Diana was not a saint, she was a woman with a bit of charm and a clothes horse, but she didn't change the world. The squabbling over this event has completely soured it.They should cancel the Diana statue unveiling as it's totally lost its meaning and turned into a circus. No.6 will use it to merch himself as the bearer of her legacy and take the opportunity to bash his family again. Either by zoom or in person but I doubt he'll come over.
If he does come with Scrotie the Scribe a load of garbage will be written and No.6 will end up making an utter fool of himself in contrast to the quiet dignity of his brother. Whatever happens, whether he comes in person or makes a remote speech, this is going to be yet another PR fail for No.6 and probably the final nail in his coffin.
It will be even worse if he allows his Ho to muscle in on the act, an utter disaster. They never learns do they. Obviously guided by the new hot-shot whizz PR team.
Rory, Harry... She goes for right lookers doesn't sheIn Dublin? Right, that must have been how she managed to shag Rory McIlroy. Got him drunk in Dicey's.
This is from an older H&M thread and I think it was also in the secret celeb gossip.
He certainly was Lord Dumbarton but maybe it was too like Dumbass or something"HarrysGreySuit on Twitter: "Just a quick reminder , Haz & That Wife we’re offered a title for their child, they declined. https://tattle.life/threads/19920/" / Twitter"
So what's happening about the supposed meeting after the unveiling? According to reports TQ,PC,PW plus others wanted PH to meet with them but it looks like either that was a bit of PR or PC has ducked out of it."Baroness Bruck on Twitter: "< In an unfortunate clash of the diaries, Prince Charles will be up in Scotland when his youngest son touches down on English soil ahead of the unveiling of Princess Diana's statue. > ... "unfortunate" !!https://tattle.life/threads/19920/" / Twitter"
I don't think that she could've had a child with the first husband, because if she did the marriage couldn't have been annulled.Sorry, wrong link. Hopefully this is correct
Could this be Meghan’s dark secret? I suppose most of you have heard the rumour that Meghan Markle has married not two but three times. ...
Could this be Meghan’s dark secret? I suppose most of you have heard the rumour that Meghan Markle has married not two but three times. Before Prince Harry and her divorced husband Trevor Engelson she is said to have married a lawyer called Joe Giuliano or in full: Joseph Goldberg-Giuliano. Howe...qr.ae
I remember reading about the first child and the twin boys. Maybe they didn't get married and just had a 'pretend' wedding.I don't think that she could've had a child with the first husband, because if she did the marriage couldn't have been annulled.
Lovely to see you back, and so happy to hear your news about your mum!I’m so touched that someone remembered me!Glad to be back, I had to take a break from those idiots, they were doing my head in!
Some personal stuff in the spoiler tag, feel free to skip.
Some might remember way back in February that I mentioned my mum’s cancer had spread, and the support and kindness I received was so lovely. I’m pleased to say that after having chemo, both of her tumours have shrunk by more than half, and are not currently ‘active’. The doctors are firmly optimistic that she will have “many years” to look forward to. She has also kept her hair, only having thinned out a bit. She will begin treatment soon, and will likely also have surgery as long as she stays healthy, which will also help to prolong her life. Compared to what we were thinking back then, we’re blessed. Obviously she will never be cured, but we are hopeful that we will have her with us for much, much longer than we thought. Just wanted to update you all and say thank you once again.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?