BBC newswatch prog What’s in a name said:- (seems like points of view as they are reading out viewers comments)
Relationships between RF and BBC has often been a tricky one
mentions 3 wks ago PW and his ‘bruv responded to allegations about The Dyson report arounf Bahirs i/v with their mother
BBC still failing to commit to not ever showing any of the the Diana i/v every again
When they announced the name of the new baby - it was widely presumed they had first spoken TQ
Source close to the S said PWB had spoken to TQ and had mentioned the name
A Palace source said this was not the case - it was never asked about her childhood name Lilibet
within a few hours what the Palace source said was strongly rejected by The Sussex’s
Letters to news orgs. were sent from their legal team saying not to repeat - but it was repeated and Johnny Dymond went on to report the Sx’s side of the story too - PWB had spoke to TQ and if she had not agreed they would not have used the name - was a direct contradiction from both sides
tweets asked ‘who is fibbing?’ and ‘The anonymous source at the palace - is the problem here BBC are fuelling an anti Megain campaign’, ‘this is a family matter and tittle tattle’
BBC cannot comment due to legal reasons at this stage
it is just re telling what has happened - nothing new added
I thought there was going to be a stern message that the BBC were standing by their source - so a non story I’m afraid