And saying he is to big for his age doesn't make sense, Harry is very tall so there is a strong possibility his son would be very tall for his age. At two my youngest son who is very tall was the same size as his average sized 5 year old brother. Children like pregnancy bumps come in all shapes and sizes, you just have to look at class photos so see the difference.
Harry and Meghan #108 Will Harry's whining ever stop? He's a giant toddler having a strop
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
What is the thing with the dancing mushies? Do they have a meaning or is it just because they are cute?Love it PomBear. 5 mushies for you
Cute. Freda started it all.
Exactly, he must do what the people want and they want Hazza and his witch wife gone which includes the kiddies. Can you imagine the future if those kiddies are Prince and Princess and the hatred they will feel towards the monachy. It will be another tit show from them too. Unless things change and the kiddies do establish some kind of loving connection to the royals they have to remain on the outside. I shudder to think of the crap Hazza and Megabitch will be feeding those children about PC, PW and Catherine. PC will need to be strong. I believe once TQ is gone there will be a major push to try and get rid of the monachy. To withstand this, PC will need to make good decisions popular with the people. This would be one of them.
I never knew about that? What happened there? Smeg really is a nasty piece of work. I know people always want to forgive, especially when it's a close relative, but I sincerely hope that Thomas doesn't fall for her crap again, daughter or not. After the way she treated him and portrayed him to the world, I would honestly feel sorry for him if he ever forgave her because it shows how much he loves that piece of garbage.
True
There was an article in the Telegraph, mostly about the woke culture, but it does mention the effect that PWB and his wife got on the British people nowadays, just the relevant (long) quote, full article in the spoiler if anybody wants to read it:
"Yet nothing has done more to make people to rise up against this totalitarian attempt at social brainwashing than the incessant posturing and bleating of the Crown Prince and Princess of Woke, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Their titanic self-regard, vacuous and self-pitying pronouncements, and consequent rudeness to the most admired person in Britain, Her Majesty the Queen, have bred ridicule and contempt.
The Duke, whose public credibility has sunk below that of Donald Duck, dropped another of his pompously so-called “truth bombs” with Oprah Winfrey. The programme aimed to answer the question: “Where do we go from here?” The British public’s reply is increasingly obvious: as far away from us as possible. Whining with self-pity from their Californian parallel universe, the pair have succeeded in driving home to all rational people the sheer irrelevance and presumptuousness of the woke view of life – and the lack of intelligence and character of those who make a career out of trying to manipulate others into obeying its rules.
The Duke fails to see that the fastest way now for the British public to be turned off anything is for him and his wife to start arguing for it; itself a clear sign that this campaign of bullying and brainwashing has been rumbled and rejected."
Have we finally passed peak woke?
The public's rejection of PC brainwashing at the National Trust suggests common sense is starting to prevail
BySimon Heffer29 May 2021 • 5:00pm
Seldom can there have been such a culture clash between the obsessives of the cult called “woke” and the backbone of mainstream British life. The recent history of the National Trust has shown how what was once a valuable institution committed to preserving, to the highest level of expertise, our heritage has become a banal, left-wing front organisation devoted to rewriting history and propagandising about the wickedness of the British past.
It was bad enough when, at Felbrigg Hall in Norfolk, the trust outed as gay the pathologically discreet R W Ketton-Cremer, who had bequeathed this marvellous house to them - as part of their ‘Prejudice & Pride‘ programme which explored the previously hidden lives of lesbian, gay and transgender inhabitants of its properties. But then last year they wasted their members’ money commissioning a report (masterminded by a university professor in something called “post-colonial literature”, and not even a historian) to find links between beneficiaries of the slave trade and Trust properties, never mind the architectural splendour or aesthetic quality of them or their contents. In a manner that Chairman Mao would have saluted, the Trust’s purpose had become the re-education of its clientele.
Advertisement
The Felbrigg episode was part of a campaign that included forcing elderly volunteers to wear rainbow lanyards, ignoring the point that espousing any cause, in a free society, must remain a matter of personal choice. However, like all warriors of woke, those running the Trust decided that personal choice was an offence. Not only was orthodoxy everything, but that expounding the orthodoxy would be the point of the Trust’s existence.
The British are slow to wrath, but when roused they fight. Jean-Claude Juncker and others discovered this in 2016. Now, that moment has arrived with the National Trust. Last month a group calling itself Restore Trust was formed with the aim of returning this once-excellent organisation to its original calling, and stripping away the politics. It threatened to table a motion at the Trust’s annual general meeting in the autumn to remove Tim Parker, for seven years the organisation’s chairman. That will now not be necessary: Mr Parker walked within 24 hours, realising the game was up. Restore Trust’s sights are now on Hilary McGrady, the director-general, the main architect of what many members see as the trust's disturbing shift away from its original aims and towards a political campaigning organisation.
Advertisement
Restore Trust’s reassertion of common sense is not just a great moment for the National Trust; it is part of a wider reaction to the patronising, self-righteous attempts of a small minority to use either their reputations or the institutions they control to force an outlook of life upon others. While much of this is driven from the grass roots up – as with Restore Trust – there are also welcome signs that many in the elite will no longer tolerate what they discern, quite correctly, as a movement to end freedom of thought and freedom of speech. It is, in short, an indication that we may have passed peak woke.
Last December an attempt to impose upon members of Cambridge University a requirement to “respect” the views of others was defeated by a landslide (86.9 per cent to 13.1) by those who wished merely to “tolerate” those views. You shouldn’t need a Cambridge PhD to understand the difference, but it had to be explained to the University’s high priests of woke: reasonable people are quite happy to tolerate the expression of views by those with whom they violently disagree but, in a free society, they cannot be commanded to respect them. That, too, was a turn of the tide, for universities have led the cancel culture: not least with half-educated students screaming blue murder every time somebody expresses an alternative opinion on some aspect of transgenderism and dons too terrified to disagree with them.
Advertisement
And Cambridge’s archbishop of woke, its increasingly eccentric vice-chancellor Professor Stephen Toope, had to execute a rapid reverse last week after approving a website where students could anonymously report “micro-aggressions” by dons: these included referring to a woman as a “girl”, turning their back on a student or delivering a backhanded compliment. Prof Toope was forced to order the website to be taken down after dons complained Cambridge was becoming a police state. The Free Speech Union threatened to take him to court and it would serve him right if they did. The government is proposing a free speech law to force universities to repudiate the cancel culture; the howls of outrage extremists in those institutions hoped would be provoked have not occurred. Most people have had enough of this dangerous foolishness.
The murder of George Floyd last year, which triggered an international spasm of woke, was and remains a horrific crime. Sadly, much of the bandwagon-jumping that followed was nauseating in its self-righteousness and cringe-making in its virtue signalling. It was also hijacked by extreme anarchist groups for whom respecting the lives of black people was a lesser consideration than overthrowing international capitalism. The censoriousness of these militants has now provoked a backlash: sportsmen have given up the stunt of “taking the knee”, not because they are happy about the murder of black people but because it became an empty gesture.
Advertisement
The BBC, which became almost paralysed with adoration for the Black Lives Matter organisation and sought to take a lead role in brainwashing the nation into believing we are all guilty, learned its lesson about overdoing the woke when hit by a tsunami of rage after attempting to “decolonise” the Last Night of the Proms. The perception of woke obsessions in broadcast news – not least since the Murdoch organisation surrendered control of Sky News – has directly led to the creation of a new channel, GB News, due to launch next month. Aware of the enormous popularity of television channels that show unwoke programmes and films from the last half of the 20th century, the recently-installed BBC director-general, Tim Davie, has reminded his senior staff that the Corporation must serve everyone.
Yet nothing has done more to make people to rise up against this totalitarian attempt at social brainwashing than the incessant posturing and bleating of the Crown Prince and Princess of Woke, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Their titanic self-regard, vacuous and self-pitying pronouncements, and consequent rudeness to the most admired person in Britain, Her Majesty the Queen, have bred ridicule and contempt.
Advertisement
The Duke, whose public credibility has sunk below that of Donald Duck, dropped another of his pompously so-called “truth bombs” with Oprah Winfrey. The programme aimed to answer the question: “Where do we go from here?” The British public’s reply is increasingly obvious: as far away from us as possible. Whining with self-pity from their Californian parallel universe, the pair have succeeded in driving home to all rational people the sheer irrelevance and presumptuousness of the woke view of life – and the lack of intelligence and character of those who make a career out of trying to manipulate others into obeying its rules.
The Duke fails to see that the fastest way now for the British public to be turned off anything is for him and his wife to start arguing for it; itself a clear sign that this campaign of bullying and brainwashing has been rumbled and rejected.
The fight is not, of course, over. There will remain some who just don’t get it and who will have to be challenged as they seek to practise their demagoguery and inflict themselves on the rest of us. But the common sense of our people has, it appears, asserted itself again, whether among the heritage-hungry middle classes, university teachers or those who watch primetime television. And it is rather wonderful; for in what we have increasingly anxiously called our free society, genuine freedom may be starting to flourish again.
The public's rejection of PC brainwashing at the National Trust suggests common sense is starting to prevail
BySimon Heffer29 May 2021 • 5:00pm
Seldom can there have been such a culture clash between the obsessives of the cult called “woke” and the backbone of mainstream British life. The recent history of the National Trust has shown how what was once a valuable institution committed to preserving, to the highest level of expertise, our heritage has become a banal, left-wing front organisation devoted to rewriting history and propagandising about the wickedness of the British past.
It was bad enough when, at Felbrigg Hall in Norfolk, the trust outed as gay the pathologically discreet R W Ketton-Cremer, who had bequeathed this marvellous house to them - as part of their ‘Prejudice & Pride‘ programme which explored the previously hidden lives of lesbian, gay and transgender inhabitants of its properties. But then last year they wasted their members’ money commissioning a report (masterminded by a university professor in something called “post-colonial literature”, and not even a historian) to find links between beneficiaries of the slave trade and Trust properties, never mind the architectural splendour or aesthetic quality of them or their contents. In a manner that Chairman Mao would have saluted, the Trust’s purpose had become the re-education of its clientele.
Advertisement
The Felbrigg episode was part of a campaign that included forcing elderly volunteers to wear rainbow lanyards, ignoring the point that espousing any cause, in a free society, must remain a matter of personal choice. However, like all warriors of woke, those running the Trust decided that personal choice was an offence. Not only was orthodoxy everything, but that expounding the orthodoxy would be the point of the Trust’s existence.
The British are slow to wrath, but when roused they fight. Jean-Claude Juncker and others discovered this in 2016. Now, that moment has arrived with the National Trust. Last month a group calling itself Restore Trust was formed with the aim of returning this once-excellent organisation to its original calling, and stripping away the politics. It threatened to table a motion at the Trust’s annual general meeting in the autumn to remove Tim Parker, for seven years the organisation’s chairman. That will now not be necessary: Mr Parker walked within 24 hours, realising the game was up. Restore Trust’s sights are now on Hilary McGrady, the director-general, the main architect of what many members see as the trust's disturbing shift away from its original aims and towards a political campaigning organisation.
Advertisement
Restore Trust’s reassertion of common sense is not just a great moment for the National Trust; it is part of a wider reaction to the patronising, self-righteous attempts of a small minority to use either their reputations or the institutions they control to force an outlook of life upon others. While much of this is driven from the grass roots up – as with Restore Trust – there are also welcome signs that many in the elite will no longer tolerate what they discern, quite correctly, as a movement to end freedom of thought and freedom of speech. It is, in short, an indication that we may have passed peak woke.
Last December an attempt to impose upon members of Cambridge University a requirement to “respect” the views of others was defeated by a landslide (86.9 per cent to 13.1) by those who wished merely to “tolerate” those views. You shouldn’t need a Cambridge PhD to understand the difference, but it had to be explained to the University’s high priests of woke: reasonable people are quite happy to tolerate the expression of views by those with whom they violently disagree but, in a free society, they cannot be commanded to respect them. That, too, was a turn of the tide, for universities have led the cancel culture: not least with half-educated students screaming blue murder every time somebody expresses an alternative opinion on some aspect of transgenderism and dons too terrified to disagree with them.
Advertisement
And Cambridge’s archbishop of woke, its increasingly eccentric vice-chancellor Professor Stephen Toope, had to execute a rapid reverse last week after approving a website where students could anonymously report “micro-aggressions” by dons: these included referring to a woman as a “girl”, turning their back on a student or delivering a backhanded compliment. Prof Toope was forced to order the website to be taken down after dons complained Cambridge was becoming a police state. The Free Speech Union threatened to take him to court and it would serve him right if they did. The government is proposing a free speech law to force universities to repudiate the cancel culture; the howls of outrage extremists in those institutions hoped would be provoked have not occurred. Most people have had enough of this dangerous foolishness.
The murder of George Floyd last year, which triggered an international spasm of woke, was and remains a horrific crime. Sadly, much of the bandwagon-jumping that followed was nauseating in its self-righteousness and cringe-making in its virtue signalling. It was also hijacked by extreme anarchist groups for whom respecting the lives of black people was a lesser consideration than overthrowing international capitalism. The censoriousness of these militants has now provoked a backlash: sportsmen have given up the stunt of “taking the knee”, not because they are happy about the murder of black people but because it became an empty gesture.
Advertisement
The BBC, which became almost paralysed with adoration for the Black Lives Matter organisation and sought to take a lead role in brainwashing the nation into believing we are all guilty, learned its lesson about overdoing the woke when hit by a tsunami of rage after attempting to “decolonise” the Last Night of the Proms. The perception of woke obsessions in broadcast news – not least since the Murdoch organisation surrendered control of Sky News – has directly led to the creation of a new channel, GB News, due to launch next month. Aware of the enormous popularity of television channels that show unwoke programmes and films from the last half of the 20th century, the recently-installed BBC director-general, Tim Davie, has reminded his senior staff that the Corporation must serve everyone.
Yet nothing has done more to make people to rise up against this totalitarian attempt at social brainwashing than the incessant posturing and bleating of the Crown Prince and Princess of Woke, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Their titanic self-regard, vacuous and self-pitying pronouncements, and consequent rudeness to the most admired person in Britain, Her Majesty the Queen, have bred ridicule and contempt.
Advertisement
The Duke, whose public credibility has sunk below that of Donald Duck, dropped another of his pompously so-called “truth bombs” with Oprah Winfrey. The programme aimed to answer the question: “Where do we go from here?” The British public’s reply is increasingly obvious: as far away from us as possible. Whining with self-pity from their Californian parallel universe, the pair have succeeded in driving home to all rational people the sheer irrelevance and presumptuousness of the woke view of life – and the lack of intelligence and character of those who make a career out of trying to manipulate others into obeying its rules.
The Duke fails to see that the fastest way now for the British public to be turned off anything is for him and his wife to start arguing for it; itself a clear sign that this campaign of bullying and brainwashing has been rumbled and rejected.
The fight is not, of course, over. There will remain some who just don’t get it and who will have to be challenged as they seek to practise their demagoguery and inflict themselves on the rest of us. But the common sense of our people has, it appears, asserted itself again, whether among the heritage-hungry middle classes, university teachers or those who watch primetime television. And it is rather wonderful; for in what we have increasingly anxiously called our free society, genuine freedom may be starting to flourish again.
Last edited:
Hope it's on after the watershed (9 o'clock). Wouldn't want to frighten the kiddies.New series coming up.on BBC 1..
David Attenborough's Weird creatures and where to find them.
Lolx.
View attachment 595993
An excellent article. Hope the gruesome twosome get to read it.True
There was an article in the Telegraph, mostly about the woke culture, but it does mention the effect that PWB and his wife got on the British people nowadays, just the relevant (long) quote, full article in the spoiler if anybody wants to read it:
"Yet nothing has done more to make people to rise up against this totalitarian attempt at social brainwashing than the incessant posturing and bleating of the Crown Prince and Princess of Woke, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Their titanic self-regard, vacuous and self-pitying pronouncements, and consequent rudeness to the most admired person in Britain, Her Majesty the Queen, have bred ridicule and contempt.
The Duke, whose public credibility has sunk below that of Donald Duck, dropped another of his pompously so-called “truth bombs” with Oprah Winfrey. The programme aimed to answer the question: “Where do we go from here?” The British public’s reply is increasingly obvious: as far away from us as possible. Whining with self-pity from their Californian parallel universe, the pair have succeeded in driving home to all rational people the sheer irrelevance and presumptuousness of the woke view of life – and the lack of intelligence and character of those who make a career out of trying to manipulate others into obeying its rules.
The Duke fails to see that the fastest way now for the British public to be turned off anything is for him and his wife to start arguing for it; itself a clear sign that this campaign of bullying and brainwashing has been rumbled and rejected."
Have we finally passed peak woke?
The public's rejection of PC brainwashing at the National Trust suggests common sense is starting to prevail
BySimon Heffer29 May 2021 • 5:00pm
Seldom can there have been such a culture clash between the obsessives of the cult called “woke” and the backbone of mainstream British life. The recent history of the National Trust has shown how what was once a valuable institution committed to preserving, to the highest level of expertise, our heritage has become a banal, left-wing front organisation devoted to rewriting history and propagandising about the wickedness of the British past.
It was bad enough when, at Felbrigg Hall in Norfolk, the trust outed as gay the pathologically discreet R W Ketton-Cremer, who had bequeathed this marvellous house to them - as part of their ‘Prejudice & Pride‘ programme which explored the previously hidden lives of lesbian, gay and transgender inhabitants of its properties. But then last year they wasted their members’ money commissioning a report (masterminded by a university professor in something called “post-colonial literature”, and not even a historian) to find links between beneficiaries of the slave trade and Trust properties, never mind the architectural splendour or aesthetic quality of them or their contents. In a manner that Chairman Mao would have saluted, the Trust’s purpose had become the re-education of its clientele.
Advertisement
The Felbrigg episode was part of a campaign that included forcing elderly volunteers to wear rainbow lanyards, ignoring the point that espousing any cause, in a free society, must remain a matter of personal choice. However, like all warriors of woke, those running the Trust decided that personal choice was an offence. Not only was orthodoxy everything, but that expounding the orthodoxy would be the point of the Trust’s existence.
The British are slow to wrath, but when roused they fight. Jean-Claude Juncker and others discovered this in 2016. Now, that moment has arrived with the National Trust. Last month a group calling itself Restore Trust was formed with the aim of returning this once-excellent organisation to its original calling, and stripping away the politics. It threatened to table a motion at the Trust’s annual general meeting in the autumn to remove Tim Parker, for seven years the organisation’s chairman. That will now not be necessary: Mr Parker walked within 24 hours, realising the game was up. Restore Trust’s sights are now on Hilary McGrady, the director-general, the main architect of what many members see as the trust's disturbing shift away from its original aims and towards a political campaigning organisation.
Advertisement
Restore Trust’s reassertion of common sense is not just a great moment for the National Trust; it is part of a wider reaction to the patronising, self-righteous attempts of a small minority to use either their reputations or the institutions they control to force an outlook of life upon others. While much of this is driven from the grass roots up – as with Restore Trust – there are also welcome signs that many in the elite will no longer tolerate what they discern, quite correctly, as a movement to end freedom of thought and freedom of speech. It is, in short, an indication that we may have passed peak woke.
Last December an attempt to impose upon members of Cambridge University a requirement to “respect” the views of others was defeated by a landslide (86.9 per cent to 13.1) by those who wished merely to “tolerate” those views. You shouldn’t need a Cambridge PhD to understand the difference, but it had to be explained to the University’s high priests of woke: reasonable people are quite happy to tolerate the expression of views by those with whom they violently disagree but, in a free society, they cannot be commanded to respect them. That, too, was a turn of the tide, for universities have led the cancel culture: not least with half-educated students screaming blue murder every time somebody expresses an alternative opinion on some aspect of transgenderism and dons too terrified to disagree with them.
Advertisement
And Cambridge’s archbishop of woke, its increasingly eccentric vice-chancellor Professor Stephen Toope, had to execute a rapid reverse last week after approving a website where students could anonymously report “micro-aggressions” by dons: these included referring to a woman as a “girl”, turning their back on a student or delivering a backhanded compliment. Prof Toope was forced to order the website to be taken down after dons complained Cambridge was becoming a police state. The Free Speech Union threatened to take him to court and it would serve him right if they did. The government is proposing a free speech law to force universities to repudiate the cancel culture; the howls of outrage extremists in those institutions hoped would be provoked have not occurred. Most people have had enough of this dangerous foolishness.
The murder of George Floyd last year, which triggered an international spasm of woke, was and remains a horrific crime. Sadly, much of the bandwagon-jumping that followed was nauseating in its self-righteousness and cringe-making in its virtue signalling. It was also hijacked by extreme anarchist groups for whom respecting the lives of black people was a lesser consideration than overthrowing international capitalism. The censoriousness of these militants has now provoked a backlash: sportsmen have given up the stunt of “taking the knee”, not because they are happy about the murder of black people but because it became an empty gesture.
Advertisement
The BBC, which became almost paralysed with adoration for the Black Lives Matter organisation and sought to take a lead role in brainwashing the nation into believing we are all guilty, learned its lesson about overdoing the woke when hit by a tsunami of rage after attempting to “decolonise” the Last Night of the Proms. The perception of woke obsessions in broadcast news – not least since the Murdoch organisation surrendered control of Sky News – has directly led to the creation of a new channel, GB News, due to launch next month. Aware of the enormous popularity of television channels that show unwoke programmes and films from the last half of the 20th century, the recently-installed BBC director-general, Tim Davie, has reminded his senior staff that the Corporation must serve everyone.
Yet nothing has done more to make people to rise up against this totalitarian attempt at social brainwashing than the incessant posturing and bleating of the Crown Prince and Princess of Woke, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Their titanic self-regard, vacuous and self-pitying pronouncements, and consequent rudeness to the most admired person in Britain, Her Majesty the Queen, have bred ridicule and contempt.
Advertisement
The Duke, whose public credibility has sunk below that of Donald Duck, dropped another of his pompously so-called “truth bombs” with Oprah Winfrey. The programme aimed to answer the question: “Where do we go from here?” The British public’s reply is increasingly obvious: as far away from us as possible. Whining with self-pity from their Californian parallel universe, the pair have succeeded in driving home to all rational people the sheer irrelevance and presumptuousness of the woke view of life – and the lack of intelligence and character of those who make a career out of trying to manipulate others into obeying its rules.
The Duke fails to see that the fastest way now for the British public to be turned off anything is for him and his wife to start arguing for it; itself a clear sign that this campaign of bullying and brainwashing has been rumbled and rejected.
The fight is not, of course, over. There will remain some who just don’t get it and who will have to be challenged as they seek to practise their demagoguery and inflict themselves on the rest of us. But the common sense of our people has, it appears, asserted itself again, whether among the heritage-hungry middle classes, university teachers or those who watch primetime television. And it is rather wonderful; for in what we have increasingly anxiously called our free society, genuine freedom may be starting to flourish again.
Last edited:
"KIRTY DWH on Twitter: "
#drawings by @figureitoutart I have to share this beauty. I don't know who draws these beautiful drawings, but it's so beautiful. This is lovely. 
#RoyalFamily https://tattle.life/threads/19920/" / Twitter"
#drawings by @figureitoutart I have to share this beauty. I don't know who draws these beautiful drawings, but it's so beautiful. This is lovely. #RoyalFamily https://tattle.life/threads/19920/" / Twitter" 
I must be coming down with something. I looked at these drawings and suddenly I was all choked up."KIRTY DWH on Twitter: "
Not to my taste I’m afraid. These are things that just didn’t happen so it’s as false a narrative as Diana posing with Meghan."KIRTY DWH on Twitter: "
I read on IG that The Crown is planning to portray Diana’s Bashir interview , not sure how true after the recent revelations but The Crown writers won’t give a shite about that .
Why don’t the writers bring up Diana’s rumoured affairs , Hewitt and the speculation about Harry’s parentage,
I bet the whiny little twit would go bleeping postal, I’d love it
Why don’t the writers bring up Diana’s rumoured affairs , Hewitt and the speculation about Harry’s parentage,
I bet the whiny little twit would go bleeping postal, I’d love it
They end up on the revamped version of Blankety Blank trying to win a blankety blank cheque book and penIt's Saturday so lets play a game.
We all know that H and wife are going to end up on reality TV shows because where else is there for them to go? I don't watch TV but I do see some stuff online. At the moment I'm watching Survivor Australia and I think it's just the show for the pair of them. Put them on opposite teams, it will make it even more fun
Now! What reality tv do you think they'll end up doing and why? And what will happen to them?
One rule! No shopping channels allowed.
Question: Haz used to be (blank)
Chas: My son? Duke of thingummybob
Scooby: Princess roast chicken?
Adele: Hmm... can't remember.... he looks vaguely familiar....
St. Meghan: The man who refused me therapy, and ran off with a one legged transsexual vegas dancer. Now I'm a single parent without any support from his dad. I only got a few million in the divorce and Archie needs a hair transplant before he starts college......
Margaret: Sane?
I do think the ‘royal by birth’ thing gets a bit 
. Charlotte is a child and should respect her elders. No easier way of getting a brat than by bowing to her. Respect the position not the person. Goes both ways, you need to be worthy of that respect because kids see through fakeness. Slimming down the family and getting rid of the extraneous lines might make the exaggerated hierarchy a bit more clear as well.
. Charlotte is a child and should respect her elders. No easier way of getting a brat than by bowing to her. Respect the position not the person. Goes both ways, you need to be worthy of that respect because kids see through fakeness. Slimming down the family and getting rid of the extraneous lines might make the exaggerated hierarchy a bit more clear as well.ReginaI'm going for Princess, or if she's really having a fit of pique Queenie
And since she wants to keep things gender neutral and in honour of PWBs bisexuality: nicknamed Reggie
This is hilarious:
Also in unrelated but might be relevant news, Naomi Campbell's charity is being investigated for having thrown a £1.5m gala event and only donated £5k to the actual cause. Eye roll
#109
Meghans silence makes us Frit & Hazza still keeps talking tit
( "Frit" is Derbyshire slang for "scared" or "worried about something bad happening." )
Meghans silence makes us Frit & Hazza still keeps talking tit
( "Frit" is Derbyshire slang for "scared" or "worried about something bad happening." )
A parent with a small child is a light sleeper (or one of two would definitely be) so would hear a phone; a man with a heavily pregnant wife would be easily woken in the night by a phone!
- Status