The Integrated Standards Store (the people that offer that certification) have a comparison page between ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 on their website:
https://integrated-standards.com/compare-management-system-structure/compare-iso-9001-iso-14001/. The defining distinction they make is that there is far more focus on environmental impact & sustainability in ISO 14001 than ISO 9001, which is more about general business quality control.
There are lots of examples of TALA presenting itself as expert but not actually proving how or following through. You can see it on the history of their website.
These are the values they state on it currently:
View attachment 982593
I could've sworn that they had inclusivity as one of their explicit values at one point so I looked at the Wayback Machine and lo and behold, here it is from 2019 to spring 2021. it was removed sometime between then and now.
(TALA made some amusingly non-inclusive font choices in their first statement about inclusivity):
View attachment 982594
View attachment 982595
View attachment 982596
At some point 'accessible' was added and then eventually removed lol. The expansion they gave on it ('sustainable style that doesn't break the bank, or planet') didn't entirely connect - the idea of being 'accessible' doesn't really concern saving planet Earth. it's got more to do with there not being barriers to people's access to something. maybe they removed it for that reason or to avoid people paying particular attention to their content's accessibility.
Either way, IMO it shows that they have either been unable to meet their own business goals i.e. keep TALA afloat/profitable
and accessible and inclusive (which indicates a lack of expertise on the team and/or a misunderstanding of accessibility and inclusivity, as implied above), or that they let the goals go so they could sell more stuff more easily. I can't see how these goals would have been affected by the pandemic, though I can see how it would have motivated them to cut corners to make money lol.
it's a bit like some gap year 'voluntourism' trip organisers - ostensibly setting out to 'save' people/the planet from an issue without trying particularly hard to understand it or having the skillset required to fix it (the comparison would be sending well-meaning teenagers over to build very poor quality housing and water systems with little to no training), making a profit for themselves & attracting acclaim at home but generally causing damage where it matters.