because her entire behaviour is that of ENTITLEMENT!Can someone who works in the family law sphere explain this to me. I can see the argument if the mother of a rich man's illegitimate one night stand by product has no home, if the richer parent has the means to do so, they should help out to put a roof over their kids head for the child's sake buttttt....
Supposing Lauryn was telling the truth for once that she has no financial stake in the portslade house with Cazza Joolie, why does Kyle have to get her a 1.3 million mansion?
An average 2 bed semi would be perfectly sufficient, Kyle could have got this one for 240k, maybe a little bit of money for decorating and furniture, then it's prozzas choice if she wants to overrun it with miracle baby'sbut no way should Kyle have to house kids that aren't his!
She wants the million pound house, big car, luxury holidays and fine dining at London restaurants.
The catch is that she doesn't want to pay for or earn these herself through hard work or merit.
Hence why she uses her child as a meal ticket and a bargaining tool to get more money.
It's 100% not what her child needs or wants, it's what Lauryn wants!
No child needs all that; rightly said he would be happy in a 200k house like that. A house needs love - not possessions.
She has no interest in parenting as proven with the full-time Nanny and claiming she's so crippled with endo she can't possibly parent.
Some of these Tattle threads I think go too hard on people and pick them apart over nothing.
However THIS thread it is impossible to do that because she's displayed time and time again she's a dangerous, greedy and narcissistic person.
)
