I can see it coming and I dread the day when it does, but paedophiles will speak up as a victim-minority wanting their particular "pastime" to be made legitimate. And then what?
They call themselves “MAP” or Minor Attracted Persons. I had a quick look, but the focus of their agitation was to do with loosening statutory rape laws with a view to reducing and removing age limits.
Some of their number seem to have attached themselves to the modern Trans movement as a colossal tick. PIE (Paedophile Information Exchange) their ideological ancestors (including notables such as Harriet Harman and her husband) attached themselves to the gay rights’ movement decades ago when the legal age for homosexual sex was older than their heterosexual counterparts. Figures who attended network meetings also campaigned for a lower age of consent. Also, PIE pretty much popped up whenever any hippy / free love movement appeared. It’s a steady drip drip of loosening people’s perceptions as what’s morally acceptable in a sexual relationship.
While the trans debate is one that needs to be had, I think those part of the feminist movement need to be aware of changes in sexual taboos, especially since from where I’m sitting, it all centres male desire and increasingly at the cost of the female.
For example, I have noticed the increased use of the phrase “kink-shaming“. When some people complained about the presence of puppy play and BDSM fetishists at a gay pride event in Brighton, they were shouted down as bigots. Additionally, polyamory seems to be an increasing hot button issue - officially about a woman’s right to share lovers, throuples and the like, but in reality a lot of it seems to be swinging and cuckolding. That’s before the human cost of pornography and OnlyFans is examined.
At one time, you’d need a dirty mac (the coat, not the computer) and knowledge of a shop with a blanked out window in Soho to even know any of this
tit, and now it’s everywhere.