It would be a kindness to do that anyway.Iâm honestly tempted to get a compass and scratch all his BB vinylâŠ
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Exactly.
That is why they need immediate access to women's spaces once they decide they are in fact women... #sarcasm
When they talk about how they "educated" youI went to edit my post but think its too late now so can only quote.
Anyway, my post was quite light hearted but I was actually quite upset as I've been part of the group for 4 years and found it quite useful to be part and also enjoyed it!
I messged the admin afterwards and asked to confirm if the reason I had been banned was because I did not like the term cis.
They messaged back saying [attached]
What i don't understand is, they did not answer my question on what exactly did I say that was transphobic? I literally said I did not like the term cis!
And when they say people commented 'emotional' comments. I don't recall it. But also if they did, why is their opinion more valid than mine?? Why wouldn't they let me have a debate? I'm a decent person* and have never once tried to have an argument on said group
*cis-woman
The bleeping narcissism. I have a great deal of experience in a couple of areas. Horses being one. And I'm a qualified nail technician. Never once in any discussion have I used that kind of language towards someone with a different opinion to me, even when I have decades of experience on them.
Maybe Iâm a pessimist but despite the recent apparent âwinsâ (CASS / the DfE non-statutory guidance for schools re âgender-questioningâ children / the proposed new changes to the NHS Constitution banning TIMs from being treated on female wards), nothing has actually changed yet. All changes currently exist in the form of recommendations, proposals and guidance, which in all likelihood will not be implemented before the next election, and, once Labour get in, risk being abandoned altogether. Just a couple of days ago, I read this article about a council passing a motion to support âLGBT+ education in schools across the boroughâ (not my borough, but not too far away):
The Conservative amendment, put forward by Councillor Patrick Adams, agreed with the original motion that all publicly funded schools in Bexley should provide information to young people about healthy relationships, including those which are LGBT +
Ostensibly, of course everyone should have accurate information about healthy relationships, but on reading the article, it becomes clear that what theyâre really talking about is endorsement of the T:
Data from the Office for National Statistics also showed that transphobic hate crime had risen by 1,211 per cent in England and Wales between 2013 and 2023.
Cllr Borella said: âTransgender people need support, they need our support. We shouldnât be condemning them.â
He added: âWe should wrap round them and give them that support on their journey as they are dealing with the issues I was dealing with in the 80s.â
Presumably they are referring to primary schools as well as secondary, which is particularly frightening. So, does this mean that the borough have now issued a blanket policy to ignore the DfE guidance? Thereâs a great deal of disparity between what the government are proposing or advising and what is actually going on, so I donât think there are grounds to be particularly optimistic about the demise of gender ideology at present.
Tory and Labour Bexley Council groups agree to support LGBT+ education in schools
Conservative and Labour groups of Bexley Council have agreed to support LGBT+ education for young people in schools across the borough.
So after imposing a law that doesnât work, and doesnât recognise women as a protected group, on Scotland, Humza Yousaf is predicted to resign in the next 24 hours because his leadership has no mandate.
Said it before here but picking up on the kids who should be doing something else with their lives, politicians should be doing something else with their powers rather than trying to appease groups who push endlessly splintered identities and canât identify what a woman is.
Of course, actually working on building a stable and productive life is, like actually putting in place meaningfully policies that work, quite difficult. So you can go on the internet and call yourself a fae non-binary demiboy and scream about how youâre misgendered in Starbucks, and politicians can decide women are a bit boring these days and canât they just budge up a bit in those prisons for a r*pist with a p*nis.
Said it before here but picking up on the kids who should be doing something else with their lives, politicians should be doing something else with their powers rather than trying to appease groups who push endlessly splintered identities and canât identify what a woman is.
Of course, actually working on building a stable and productive life is, like actually putting in place meaningfully policies that work, quite difficult. So you can go on the internet and call yourself a fae non-binary demiboy and scream about how youâre misgendered in Starbucks, and politicians can decide women are a bit boring these days and canât they just budge up a bit in those prisons for a r*pist with a p*nis.
I wonder if Yousefâs resignation will see a repeal of the hate crime bill, given that itâs both pointless and unworkable?
Everything boils down to Social Media. People spend their leisure time on SM rather than out doing things and meeting people and Politicians think that what they see on SM reflects the reality when it doesn't, it's just populated by sad, lonely individuals of which the numbers are growing exponentially as more and more of our daily lives go online and our social circle shrinks.
She didn't want to answer that question in a succinct and honest way. Weasel.Maybe notJenny Gilruth (with the green trim jacket) is in the running.
Old but accurate
---
Also
---
Also
From what I understand, the trans women who are killed are often sex workers, and, sadly, that is true for women in sex work. I don't like calling it sex work, I don't think it's a career.
Other than that, trans women put themselves in more danger by pretending they are actually women and then men are angry to find out they have penises. I do not have a clue why someone would fail to disclose that to a prospective sexual partner, it's fundamental to who you are. Again it's men who are the danger
Other than that, trans women put themselves in more danger by pretending they are actually women and then men are angry to find out they have penises. I do not have a clue why someone would fail to disclose that to a prospective sexual partner, it's fundamental to who you are. Again it's men who are the danger
Both the council and watchdog need to attend mandatory training sessions in free expression and protected beliefs. Very satisfying. Hopefully they can do the work and educate themselves
I find this judgment very reassuring in case Iâm âoutedâ as a TERF at work. I work for a sensible company but still the risk remains. Iâm glad finally there is some common sense here and a recognition that this hounding of women for refusing to adopt a particular ideology is not consistent with employment law.Both the council and watchdog need to attend mandatory training sessions in free expression and protected beliefs. Very satisfying. Hopefully they can do the work and educate themselves
How we ever got into this messâŠ!
Oh I think the tide is turning albeit slowly
The unpopular Greens out of gov in Scotland
The Cass review and the inevitable legislation
The Meade case and aggravated and exemplary damages being payable due to bodies following stonewall law and not the actual law of the land
Tick tock
The unpopular Greens out of gov in Scotland
The Cass review and the inevitable legislation
The Meade case and aggravated and exemplary damages being payable due to bodies following stonewall law and not the actual law of the land
Tick tock
@Metropolis ...You must live near to me!Maybe Iâm a pessimist but despite the recent apparent âwinsâ (CASS / the DfE non-statutory guidance for schools re âgender-questioningâ children / the proposed new changes to the NHS Constitution banning TIMs from being treated on female wards), nothing has actually changed yet. All changes currently exist in the form of recommendations, proposals and guidance, which in all likelihood will not be implemented before the next election, and, once Labour get in, risk being abandoned altogether. Just a couple of days ago, I read this article about a council passing a motion to support âLGBT+ education in schools across the boroughâ (not my borough, but not too far away):
The Conservative amendment, put forward by Councillor Patrick Adams, agreed with the original motion that all publicly funded schools in Bexley should provide information to young people about healthy relationships, including those which are LGBT +
Ostensibly, of course everyone should have accurate information about healthy relationships, but on reading the article, it becomes clear that what theyâre really talking about is endorsement of the T:
Data from the Office for National Statistics also showed that transphobic hate crime had risen by 1,211 per cent in England and Wales between 2013 and 2023.
Cllr Borella said: âTransgender people need support, they need our support. We shouldnât be condemning them.â
He added: âWe should wrap round them and give them that support on their journey as they are dealing with the issues I was dealing with in the 80s.â
Presumably they are referring to primary schools as well as secondary, which is particularly frightening. So, does this mean that the borough have now issued a blanket policy to ignore the DfE guidance? Thereâs a great deal of disparity between what the government are proposing or advising and what is actually going on, so I donât think there are grounds to be particularly optimistic about the demise of gender ideology at present.
Tory and Labour Bexley Council groups agree to support LGBT+ education in schools
Conservative and Labour groups of Bexley Council have agreed to support LGBT+ education for young people in schools across the borough.www.newsshopper.co.uk
I don't disagree in principle with LGBT education. I don't really care if some religious groups don't like it, as far as I'm concerned, religion doesn't trump science, nor does it excuse bigotry against gay people. But I do disagree with teachers, or anyone, telling kids that they might feel like they're "in the wrong body", or that people can change sex. Children are already under immense pressure on SM to look a certain way, or to aspire to attain unrealistic body shapes and sizes. Suggesting to children that botox or breast implants would improve their mental health, would rightly be shouted down, so why is gender-affirming surgery or hormones treated as something beneficial? If teachers think that they're going to ignore the Cass report, they'll hopefully be in for a bit of a shock, I can't see too many parents letting them get away with that, Bexley is hardly full of progressives, it's the epitome of surburbia!
(Unlike my borough, who are working with an LGBT collective who have plans for "Queering urban tree pits"...I've read that sentence many times, and I still can't work out what they're on about!
)Queering urban tree pits?
WTAF?
That said, Kew Gardens queered plants the other year, I'm going to a gig there in July and I'll be fully armed with stickers and ribbons.
WTAF?
That said, Kew Gardens queered plants the other year, I'm going to a gig there in July and I'll be fully armed with stickers and ribbons.
Humza Yousaf has finally resigned. Good riddance!
What? Iâm aware some plants have a sex and many have make and female parts but pretty sure they donât identify as anything
He needs a swift kick up the arse.
- Status