“I’m denied the most basic need, especially for us females: the need to have close contact and relationships with other females.”
Well wow, there are some truly deluded people making posts there. I think this one stood out, trans people and "cis" (god I hate that word) look exactly the same...they have got to be kidding...I had to look it up. The term was apparently coined by a trans activist (not sure if trans identified themselves, I’ve not looked him/her up)
The Cotton Ceiling – lesbian women must consider trans women as potential sexual partners
Quite a collection of social media posts here that are not good for the blood pressure but really help to understand the narrative they are pushing. Transphobic, trans misogyny, cissexist. not an ally, blah blah blah… if lesbians don’t want to date men - with or without their penis.
Cotton ceiling and autogynephilia
The Cotton Ceiling – lesbian women must consider trans women as potential sexual partners Autogynephilia – fetishising female bodies or feminine submissionterfisaslur.com
This one stood out for me at the end of a response to a lesbian who was an ‘ally’ but wasn’t attracted to TW. I’ll admit I only read the first few and had enough - there are over 90 on that page! (The website itself is GC, but collating all the crap like this to show what’s really going on)
This is such an incel man thing to say, isn't it? Women should just go out with us when we ask them because we deserve it blah blah blah. duck off.
Coercive bastard.
Breaking news!!!! 
www.frontpages.com
Archived version of the article https://archive.ph/hEdp5
The Daily Telegraph - Today's Front Page
Discover today's edition of the newspaper, cover and headline.
I mean, It’s great that this is happening, but how the duck did we get to a point that the NHS acknowledging the reality of biology is a front-page headline?!
No! This is out and out gaslighting. They have already changed everything so as women are penalised for recognising the truth. All they need to do is turn it back to the way it always was!
I was thinking along the same lines, was pleased when I saw the article and then realised it’s just pre-election guff that will be forgotten about in no timeArchived version of the article https://archive.ph/hEdp5
I know the telegraph are really trying to hammer home the insanity of gender ideology, but the NHS hasn’t actually declared this at all. It’s reporting on proposed changes to the NHS constitution, currently being updated by Victoria Atkins (secretary of State for Health and Social Care) in line with requirements to update every ten years. The next update is due in 2025, after the general election, so these changes may not even happen, which is a shame because the new constitution would state, “we are defining sex as biological sex.” Can’t see Labour being that ‘controversial’.
Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, which represents healthcare leaders, said its members would review the proposals in detail.
However, he added: “What is absolutely clear at this stage is that a focus on high-quality care for all is maintained and that the NHS is not dragged into a pre-election culture wars debate. This is not where energies should be focused.”
Mr Taylor said staff worked hard to show fairness and compassion towards all patients.
“In particular, groups of people, including trans and non-binary patients, continue to receive some of the worst health outcomes of any group in our society and NHS leaders and staff will want to do all they can to support these patients, as well as their trans and non-binary staff to reduce inequalities…”
Women’s safety and requirements are less important according to Taylor’s perception.
Thanks ~ so not quite the cause for celebration I’d hoped forArchived version of the article https://archive.ph/hEdp5
I know the telegraph are really trying to hammer home the insanity of gender ideology, but the NHS hasn’t actually declared this at all. It’s reporting on proposed changes to the NHS constitution, currently being updated by Victoria Atkins (secretary of State for Health and Social Care) in line with requirements to update every ten years. The next update is due in 2025, after the general election, so these changes may not even happen, which is a shame because the new constitution would state, “we are defining sex as biological sex.” Can’t see Labour being that ‘controversial’.
Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, which represents healthcare leaders, said its members would review the proposals in detail.
However, he added: “What is absolutely clear at this stage is that a focus on high-quality care for all is maintained and that the NHS is not dragged into a pre-election culture wars debate. This is not where energies should be focused.”
Mr Taylor said staff worked hard to show fairness and compassion towards all patients.
“In particular, groups of people, including trans and non-binary patients, continue to receive some of the worst health outcomes of any group in our society and NHS leaders and staff will want to do all they can to support these patients, as well as their trans and non-binary staff to reduce inequalities…”
Women’s safety and requirements are less important according to Taylor’s perception.
Agree. Back then, presumably, it was considered a kindness to placate a small number of older white AGP men. Such tiny numbers of people, it was never really going to have an impact on society.
