News today.....
Perfectly put. People have drawn comparisons with Kid’s Company, which really was THE trendy children’s charity which lefty celebs loved to be associated with - just like Mermaids. Because, like you said, it was all about basking in the glow of being seen to be associated with this fabulous charity and their colourful CEO.I need to get some thoughts off my chest hope you don't mind.
Mermaids and their supporters
Social media types and self- promoters latching onto the new in thing that will make them look good. Probably never looked beyond the front cover as to what they are associated with, probably don't care, definitely the narcissistic type
The blind faith people, not very bright, #bekind, let's make the world a better place. Genuinely good people but prone to cultism and group think. Also not looked beyond the front page
Staff, trustees, CEO, etc. Sociopathic vultures. All have something to gain, they are totally aware of what they are doing and do not care. What they gain from being involved in this so called charity I will leave to your imaginations.
Why are they not closed now? Even as a temporary thing whilst the ptb investigate child safe guarding. Do we need to rethink the CC. It's depressing as I trust no one anymore.![]()
Academia ok with the Japanese w**ker having ‘free speech’ but treats Kathleen Stock likeThe Breslow stuff on Twitter has been really enlightening about the central tenets of queer theory, which is “queering” normative boundaries around sex - sex with children, sex with animals, you name it, some academic has written/lectured about it.
I even saw a headline from Times Higher Education (paywalled, so I couldn’t read it) complaining about the suspension of that Japanese porn wanking PhD student because it went against free speech.
Does academia need to think a bit harder about what free speech means? Either that or disband their ethics committees and let people research whatever degenerate/borderline illegal tit they feel like.
I saw some TRA yesterday explaining how the n*once-apologist was simply comparing paraphilia when writing in a sexually explicit way about a child compared to a shoe. As if that's not exactly the problem? The hubris to think our concern is that we don't understand the academic purpose of what was written and if only we did we'd see it's just innocent theorising! We're just being hysterical!The Breslow stuff on Twitter has been really enlightening about the central tenets of queer theory, which is “queering” normative boundaries around sex - sex with children, sex with animals, you name it, some academic has written/lectured about it.
I even saw a headline from Times Higher Education (paywalled, so I couldn’t read it) complaining about the suspension of that Japanese porn wanking PhD student because it went against free speech.
Does academia need to think a bit harder about what free speech means? Either that or disband their ethics committees and let people research whatever degenerate/borderline illegal tit they feel like.
Emma Watson, poss Davina McCall? I'm sure I saw something mentioned on Twitter the other day." We love & support Mermaids , it has our full support. We are doing the right thing, helping and supporting young children- fighting against these nasty abusive people who want it shut down, going against everything we stand for and support ( .....tweeted by all the trendies, band-wagon- jumpers & tambourine-slappers)
*** 5 seconds later ***
" we regret to inform you that the charity has paedos as trustees"
***** utter bleeping silence in online media , from previously enthusiastic, ranting supporters ****
bleeps. We need a list on here, of Mermaids supporters
if you want to read articles behind paywall yu can post them here : https://archive.md/The Breslow stuff on Twitter has been really enlightening about the central tenets of queer theory, which is “queering” normative boundaries around sex - sex with children, sex with animals, you name it, some academic has written/lectured about it.
I even saw a headline from Times Higher Education (paywalled, so I couldn’t read it) complaining about the suspension of that Japanese porn wanking PhD student because it went against free speech.
Does academia need to think a bit harder about what free speech means? Either that or disband their ethics committees and let people research whatever degenerate/borderline illegal tit they feel like.
This is mean and I’m a bad person, but I can’t stand Freddy. Something about her pinched, mean looking face, and the obviously feminine features hiding behind her scraggly facial hair. TIFs always give me creepy, Uncanny Valley vibes. Not to mention her seething internalised misogyny. Just looked at her Insta and there’s a video of herself in her underwear, packer and allMeant to say does anyone listen to the podcast happy mum happy baby? Giovana Fletcher’s podcast. She had Freddie McConnell onobviously couldn’t listen. So so disappointed in Gi. I thought she knew better but she’s just another lemming.
also, Freddie is quite simply very, very, very stupid.This is mean and I’m a bad person, but I can’t stand Freddy. Something about her pinched, mean looking face, and the obviously feminine features hiding behind her scraggly facial hair. TIFs always give me creepy, Uncanny Valley vibes. Not to mention her seething internalised misogyny. Just looked at her Insta and there’s a video of herself in her underwear, packer and all
Her poor kids. Wonder whether it’s possible for them to grow up happy and comfortable in the bodies they were born in.
I genuinely can’t believe how lucky we are to have her
An absolute diamond.I genuinely can’t believe how lucky we are to have her![]()
This is exactly it - it acts as if "queer" really DOES mean deviant and wrong and then LGB people get tarred with that brush and lumped into the same category as paedophiles, raving TRAs, and sex offendersThe Breslow stuff on Twitter has been really enlightening about the central tenets of queer theory, which is “queering” normative boundaries around sex - sex with children, sex with animals, you name it, some academic has written/lectured about it.
the best thing is she is so much funnier, and so much more intelligent than any of the holes who have tried to ruin her life since she came out on this stuff.I genuinely can’t believe how lucky we are to have her![]()
Uncanny Valley is spot on. Me and my (gay male) friend were watching an old episode of First Dates the other night. When the bloke on the date appeared my mate was like, "what's up with him, there's something weird and off about him, gay-but-not-quite" and despite this person probably passing pretty well day to day I instantly clocked her as a TiF. Almost like being able to determine someone's sex is an innate human skillThis is mean and I’m a bad person, but I can’t stand Freddy. Something about her pinched, mean looking face, and the obviously feminine features hiding behind her scraggly facial hair. TIFs always give me creepy, Uncanny Valley vibes. Not to mention her seething internalised misogyny. Just looked at her Insta and there’s a video of herself in her underwear, packer and all
Her poor kids. Wonder whether it’s possible for them to grow up happy and comfortable in the bodies they were born in.
Evolution is a big old terfy terf.Almost like being able to determine someone's sex is an innate human skill.