a bleeping birth photographer? When so many women have just had to give birth alone? Give me STRENGTH
Did she give birth in a private hospital?
Did she give birth in a private hospital?
Nope NHSa bleeping birth photographer? When so many women have just had to give birth alone? Give me STRENGTH
Did she give birth in a private hospital?
I took it to mean that she’s gone into labour by herself, not induced?Also…. I very much doubt it was a true “spontaneous labour” if it took 4 days? (Likely needed intervention to “speed up” labour is my guess) Likely she went into “slow labour” (normal) couldn’t handle it and insisted on help progressing… (all the drugs hints at this too) is my guess but, I’m only a mum of 4 with a huge interest in birth!!
Not at all or I am too. My husband had to leave so soon after the birth, we got about 5mins after the birth together that’s it until I was able to come home 36 hours later. It was traumatic and I’ll always have a chip on my shoulder about it. Seeing that tit makes me want to scream bloody murderI'm actually proper pissed off she got to have her birth photographer, does that make me a terrible hole?
I wonder if we’ll have another Rebekah Vardy/Coleen Rooney momentOf course it’s about her not the baby, isn't everything, wonder if she’d worked out who leaked the Facebook photo and the birth
It’s worse than that she’s spoken many times about the first embryo being perfect and even wondered if she should have had ‘wonky’ implanted and the perfect one frozenSo…I only lurk on this thread and dont know the ins and outs of Georgia, and I don’t have kids, but the wonky thing really bothers me was she basically saying it was the less perfect embryo, and now the baby’s born she’s using the wonky thing again?? The baby isn’t ‘wonky’, hopefully she’s perfectly healthy…imagine growing up knowing your mum referred to you as wonky! To me that comes across as ‘less than perfect’
Most of us !!!!Who called the "awful dramatic Labour"
I don’t know, for a labour to last 4 days that started spontaneously is quite odd. I mean I think she went into the normal first stage of labour or “slow labour” that can last days/weeks where the cervix thins and ripens ready for birth and she assumed it was active labour and went in for augmentation which wouldn’t be spontaneous labour it would be induction to speed things up, it’s just my guess may not have happened.I took it to mean that she’s gone into labour by herself, not induced?
I had a 4 day labour but it wasn't that dramatic ! I lost my mucus plug on the first day then had some contractions which then stopped ....etc etc...she always has to be soo bloody dramatic and all about her ...I don’t know, for a labour to last 4 days that started spontaneously is quite odd. I mean I think she went into the normal first stage of labour or “slow labour” that can last days/weeks where the cervix thins and ripens ready for birth and she assumed it was active labour and went in for augmentation which wouldn’t be spontaneous labour it would be induction to speed things up, it’s just my guess may not have happened.
Everyone’s experience is different though, just my take. My 4th was induced due to days of start and stop contractions due to him being back to back, I was contracting regularly then they would tail off, he was my 4th with 3 spontaneous labours before him, but I class him as induction because we needed meds to speed things up.