helenafloss
Active member
Can we also acknowledge that she has a black Labrador called Zulu…?!!? WTAF. You’d think she’s keep that one to herself
no secure couple in the history of mankind has ever felt the need to publicly release something like that unless they are desperately trying to prove to the world they are not unhappyActually embarrassing what's she trying to prove
Just another example of her cashing in on something that isnt relevant to her ! Since when was she a Simply Be customer?I wouldn’t have even put her at a size 12 tbh.
It's tragic at best.very narcissistic isn’t it. Endless selfies and 10 photos of herself on her grid in the time she’s been on holiday. That’s not even delving into the fact she spent time while on holiday, arguing with people in the comments section like an utter weapon.
but it’s obvs not vanity, it’s EmPoWeRmEnT according to Em.
oh yeh completely! My issue isn’t what she’s saying so much as, 1. She’s co opting other people’s experiences. If Em has been in a long term relationship since her teens then presumably these aren’t her experiences to talk about. She’s just borrowing the because she knows lots of women *have* had them, and it makes her more relatable to tap into it 2. Calling one night stands “horrifically sordid” and using the word “slag”. Why are one night stands sordid? Why do we need to use misogynistic language? Why can’t we just say a girl would be judged for one night stands instead of perpetuating words use to slut shame?I dunno I kind of agree with it! When I was younger my fri and sat nights were LIFE. I’d spend the day shopping, tanning, doing hair, nails makeup etc for a night out to possibly flirt or get with a guy who probably had skid marks in his pants
I don't think that's the only person she tracked down either. Someone I know got a message about being on this thread as well (but isn't actually on Tattle, so is the wrong person ) That's what brought me to her thread as I thought it seemed like harassment..She can’t help it, and I find it so strange that she has gone out of her way to find someone and message them like that? From her podcast she always seems as though she would rise above it and be the bigger person, but clearly not. Arguably it’s harassment to go out of your way to track that person down…
who says they are too long? That’s subjective.They are way too long though? So surely that’s an issue ?
I reckon overprotective mum clarkson will move in and do all the hard work whilst em takes selfies in bed with captions about how it’s ok to be tiredI'm guessing there will be a hidden live in nanny while pretending to do it all herself. I hate it when they hide the nanny!
Agreed. It shows a lot that the vast majority of people here used to like her and this used to be a rave thread, but her recent and changing behaviour has changed our minds. Were we sad losers when we were coming on here to rave about her?So everyone that posts on Tattle is unwell, needs help, is some lonely sad loser that hasn't got a life ? What a lazy ill-informed assumption! And way easier to think that then to actually acknowledge alot of the constructive comments that have been made here about her recent behaviour have been made by eloquent and clearly well educated people.
She's clearly been triggered by what she has read here, but as her therapist friend said many times she needs to work on herself..perhaps address the fact she speaks out on things she has no experience of and should not be profiting off !
I really enjoy reading your posts. You write so eloquently and I like that your replies are thought out and interesting.For anyone under the misunderstanding that Em is a victim in the Clarkson V Clarkson saga…
Google her name now, and you’ll get a column in pretty much every national newspaper about how she’s “condemning” her father. Most of the U.K. doesn’t know who she is - but she’s sure making headlines for next to nothing now. This will be generating traffic to her insta, garnering her sympathy follows and likes.
At the start of this month, she had ~265k followers… she now has 283k… an extra 18 thousand people in the space of three weeks. Her post about Meghan has 29k likes, in contrast to her overall average of 6k likes per post. All of this, translates as building her “career” and translates into revenue stream for her.
But let’s pretend that, despite all of the showbiz help she has at her disposal, and despite years of experience her parents have between them, and despite the fact her husband works in PR (specifically, reputational damage) and despite the fact she has her own management (Jenny Rose at 84 world, who is head of operations and above the other regular talent managers, which means Em enjoys the best treatment and management possible)… let’s suspend disbelief for a second and pretend this has all been some accidental faux pas.
She still has the aforementioned support available to her. She has still undoubtedly benefited from this. What are the downsides exactly? Some angry DMs shes (presumbably) receiving. In a couple of days people will forget what Jeremy Clarkson wrote and how his daughter responded… but she’ll still have enjoyed that surge of exposure and engagement.
and sure, when articles like jeremy’s are printed, all women suffer. It feeds into a misogynist public dialogue, it reaffirms sexist attitudes, it feeds into internalised misogyn. But what I won’t accept is the pretence that it effects all women the same.
because WOC, poor women, disabled women and so on, suffer much more than the likes of Em Clarkson ever will, from her dad’s sexist rants. He feels comfortable being openly sexist because he knows his daughter is protected from it to an extent.
em is only concerned about misogyny when it negatively affects her. She isn’t intersectional in her personal brand of feminism. She is happy to peddle fast fashion in full knowledge of how exploitive it is towards women. She is happy to accept promotional column inches from the sun when it involves selling her book. She is happy to benefit from nepotism from her father. She is happy to latch onto the first man to take her seriously. She is completely happy to benefit from misogyny and is never really concerned with actually dismantling any real patriarchal systems. She doesn’t refuse to do business with the sun, she didn’t refuse opportunities nepotism brings her - even though all of this harms other women who don’t enjoy the buffers she has, shes happy time and time again to overlook it all. Sorry, but posting a vid saying it’s OK to eat a doughnut, doesn’t cut it. It doesn’t negate all the shitty practices she engages in. It’s superficial, it’s easy, it’s cheap feminism without any real backbone.
so sorry but in my view, Em Clarkson is no victim. Not in any direct sense.
She’s gone from 100 to 0 in 48 hours. Vile behaviour.View attachment 1173733
Actually you know what I just saw this and it's pissed me right off. Fuck off. Every single person you argued with had more intellectual arguments than what you're giving credit for. You just know there's minimal logic behind your argument so you have to be petty about it.
Lalala explain has defended emily Clarkson on her stories . I think it’s really sad what her dad has done tbh . I feel for Emily a bit , imagine your own dad behaving like that?I wasn’t aware of Jeremy’s comments until earlier (I don’t read much online) but what on earth would possess him to have such odd thoughts and such hatred towards Meghan? And why would he need to air them publicly and why would an editor think yes let’s publish these.
I know the sun, the daily fail etc are absolute trash but this is appalling. Nobody deserves to be spoken about or treated this way. Ultimately nobody really knows the truth, if PH and MM are happy not being part of the royal family then that’s their business.
I’ve unfollowed her, after a bit of an internal debate. I haven’t been missing her! Shame as she was one of my faves!I completely agree with all of the comments here. They’ve just made themselves look worse arguing with people and trying to tell them what their opinion of Nelly should be and parroting that it’s empowering. The thing that really annoyed me however is the constant “stop telling us because we aren’t parents that we don’t get it, you can’t say that”. As a parent myself, I try my hardest to be more “with the times” and do things right involving modern life, making sure we are getting things “right”. while yes a female should be able to wear what she likes when she likes, be empowered, there is a line. I don’t feel that walking around in lingerie really sends the right message. Yes there are adverts and shop displays around that are overtly sexual but to do the same to almost compete and argue back doesn’t make sense. It’s just trying to point score and doesn’t achieve anything.
I understand it can be insensitive to say to someone you aren’t a parent, you wouldn’t understand, but I feel entirely different about things since I became a parent. At the end of the day, keeping our children innocent and protected as long as we can in this crazy, social media heavy world isn’t a bad thing. I honestly dread the day I have to tackle social media, phones, etc because I know the exposure and dangers that come with it.
I used to really like Em, found her in lockdown with the FGF and I really needed those happy stories to help me see that the world was still turning and there were still things to be excited about. But in recent months she’s really irritated me. I liked the podcast but after a few episodes couldn’t listen anymore. When she got Covid before her recent op and kept moaning, I mentioned it to my husband and he was like if it was so important time wise why was she out socialising, putting herself at risk knowing if she got Covid she couldn’t have the op. She was extremely lucky her surgeon just squeezed her in the next week, anybody else would have had to wait months. I watched ant & dec recently, they pranked Jeremy Clarkson and his reaction was quite I’ve never really paid attention to stories or watched top gear so don’t have any idea the kind of person he is. Very close to unfollowing Em as she’s just become insufferable.