Well now she says she was being abused and gaslit and couldn't tell the world the truth about how unhappy she really was the whole time
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I’m sure everyone she is ever close to will be referred to like this at some stage.
I agree. She sung his praises in a private group that he didn't belong to wasn't doing it to appease him . She dedicated her PhD to him and the kids
The fact her ex- husband hasn't spoken about this makes me think she has some kind of silencing tool slapped on him. Having seen the lies she made up about Sally Ann I have ZERO reason to think she hasn't done the same to him. And he may feel that he risks too much re the kids by going against it.
And HI everyone- I'm interested as I'm a feminist who is worried by some feminist activists drifting towards dodgy approaches re anti-vax, anti-medicine & exploiting women for cash.
International Women's Day....... What does the delightful "Dr" Jess have for us........? Ah self-promotion via her panel for The Indy, pushing her latest untested and retraumatising and unsafe tat for 'free' (((((((((DATA FARMING))))))))))))...... Welcome to Victim Focus where the first hit is free (((((((((((((((((EYE ROLL)))))))))))))))))))))))
Meanwhile, Jaimi ((((((((((((((((((((((((((((who has now disappeared from Jess's profile))))))))))))))))))))))))))) posts a gushing post about Jess, which also turns into a marketing/data farming thread where she haplessly tags Jess Philips- yes really- who wised up to their grift, dishonesty, manipulation and lack of expertise several years ago. The one thing women who have worked in front line services HATE, is grifters, who turn up like bulls in a china shop exploiting vulnerable women.
---
-----
As for Satanic Ritual Abuse...................
So this brings up some interesting and conflicting feelings for Jess and Jaimi------ both were invested in this conspiracy (Jaimi was a child herself so has an excuse). Has Jess ever backtracked or clarified that she now accepts this is a hoax?
And I wonder if the documentary team approached her, as they interview lots of the conspiracy theorists in it? I guess they either haven't heard of her, or she had to turn down some prime time tv. Either was that must hurt.
There are SO many lies in these two posts
'I have never heard of Q'ANON'. (((((right))))))) She really thinks she can be a credible feminist and not know one of the major alt right sources pushing 'red pill' type content? And unaware that it is the home of much of her anti-vax, anti-path, anri-specialist content she is now pushing.
'I have worked with covert teams'..... errr lol does that mean she was in a chat with Rupert Quaintance, a woman hating, knife wielding troll?
I'm sorry but Jessica Taylor is nothing but a menace, a threat to the credibility of women's rights groups and should hurry up and go and be a holiday blogger that she dreams of, and has failed so spectacularly at.
..........................................................oh sorry- she can't do that as she needs it funded by traumatised and exploited victim/survivors........
Meanwhile, Jaimi ((((((((((((((((((((((((((((who has now disappeared from Jess's profile))))))))))))))))))))))))))) posts a gushing post about Jess, which also turns into a marketing/data farming thread where she haplessly tags Jess Philips- yes really- who wised up to their grift, dishonesty, manipulation and lack of expertise several years ago. The one thing women who have worked in front line services HATE, is grifters, who turn up like bulls in a china shop exploiting vulnerable women.
---
-----
As for Satanic Ritual Abuse...................
So this brings up some interesting and conflicting feelings for Jess and Jaimi------ both were invested in this conspiracy (Jaimi was a child herself so has an excuse). Has Jess ever backtracked or clarified that she now accepts this is a hoax?
And I wonder if the documentary team approached her, as they interview lots of the conspiracy theorists in it? I guess they either haven't heard of her, or she had to turn down some prime time tv. Either was that must hurt.
There are SO many lies in these two posts
'I have never heard of Q'ANON'. (((((right))))))) She really thinks she can be a credible feminist and not know one of the major alt right sources pushing 'red pill' type content? And unaware that it is the home of much of her anti-vax, anti-path, anri-specialist content she is now pushing.
'I have worked with covert teams'..... errr lol does that mean she was in a chat with Rupert Quaintance, a woman hating, knife wielding troll?
I'm sorry but Jessica Taylor is nothing but a menace, a threat to the credibility of women's rights groups and should hurry up and go and be a holiday blogger that she dreams of, and has failed so spectacularly at.
..........................................................oh sorry- she can't do that as she needs it funded by traumatised and exploited victim/survivors........
Last edited:
It's just provocative baiting so that she can moan about the haters/position herself as victim when they point out the lack of beauty/intelligence. The fangirlz will jump to the defence & sooth. Another drama & mememe spotlight created by toddler like *I'm queen of the world*
Given the inferred allegations about ex(s) I'm surprised at the lack of response. Some people are very quick to shout defamation/libel.
It's power & threat. I have money/platform/status I control the narrative. In my view this is just as abusive as coercive control as these type of allegations/inferences would (if accepted) lower the image of the individual in the minds of right thinking people.
Given the inferred allegations about ex(s) I'm surprised at the lack of response. Some people are very quick to shout defamation/libel.
It's power & threat. I have money/platform/status I control the narrative. In my view this is just as abusive as coercive control as these type of allegations/inferences would (if accepted) lower the image of the individual in the minds of right thinking people.
I suspect part of the lack of response is knowing that any kind of reaction will make things worse. The only way to deal with narcissists in your life is to cut them off or grey rock them.
Yes you're right Boogs ! But oh God those poor kids. No doubt their classmates/classmates parents see this stuff she spouts. Must be awful for them.
Surely even her most ardent supporters must think about the impact such words would have on her kids. My mum is a narcissist and my heart really goes out to anyone unfortunate enough to have parents like this.
Someone on Facebook asked about this and was shot down by JT and one of her minions
This is around the time I became aware of her too. I saw the ECT stuff and was like
this seems very one sided-------------------------------------------------------
Turns out it's not only us seeing through the BS
Last edited:
More projection from Jessica. She's dumped people close to her time and again once they stopped being useful to her, or asked one too many questions.
Attachments
Hi Jess!
I totally understand all of this, and agree. What I don't understand is why, after seeing it, you wouldn't be trying to help your children leave the abusive home of a rapist. Especially when you have the money and a best friend who is apparently a big shot barrister.
---
-------------
The trauma tool's 'personalised and detailed' response after ripping peoples trauma open is.... "google it".
I'm so glad we have Jessica's powerful brain educating people the uses of googling. It's so widely unknown.
Apparently it's an opt out to share information with her, ethically, knowing people miss boxes or don't read and skip things, this doesn't seem OK. I don't know of it states what she'll do with the information in detail but again, consent seems iffy.
The amazing free tool she made just seems to be a data mining app, collecting stuff for her next book.
I totally understand all of this, and agree. What I don't understand is why, after seeing it, you wouldn't be trying to help your children leave the abusive home of a rapist. Especially when you have the money and a best friend who is apparently a big shot barrister.
---
-------------
The trauma tool's 'personalised and detailed' response after ripping peoples trauma open is.... "google it".
I'm so glad we have Jessica's powerful brain educating people the uses of googling. It's so widely unknown.
Apparently it's an opt out to share information with her, ethically, knowing people miss boxes or don't read and skip things, this doesn't seem OK. I don't know of it states what she'll do with the information in detail but again, consent seems iffy.
The amazing free tool she made just seems to be a data mining app, collecting stuff for her next book.
Last edited:
No one’s denying this happens in abusive relationships or that anyone who said they loved their abuser is now lying about ever being abused
What is questionable, and entirely relevant given it relates to her work, is that she has spoken/written in a professional context about how abusive men should never be given custody of sons because they will train them to hate and abuse women. But she allowed (not a decision of family court) her sons to live with a man who according to her is abusive, a misogynist, homophobic, and possibly a sex offender. While marketing herself as an expert in, among other things, “trauma informed” parenting, family violence, and how to raise boys to respect women
What is questionable, and entirely relevant given it relates to her work, is that she has spoken/written in a professional context about how abusive men should never be given custody of sons because they will train them to hate and abuse women. But she allowed (not a decision of family court) her sons to live with a man who according to her is abusive, a misogynist, homophobic, and possibly a sex offender. While marketing herself as an expert in, among other things, “trauma informed” parenting, family violence, and how to raise boys to respect women
I really hope Alex speaks out
I not denying this happens in abusive relationships (although having been in an abusive relationship that I left at great emotional and financial expense, I'd have sawn my own leg off with a butter knife before I embarassed myself gushing about him to my friends on social media, even when things were "good" I'd have felt embarassed raving about what a great person he was and it wouldn't have made him treat me any better), I just think in this relationship Jess was and continues to be the abuser.
I'd also lay down and die before I allowed my children to live with a rapist and abuser, especially the child to whom the alleged abuser has no genetic or legal link.
There is nothing less feminist than using accusations of abuse as a get out of jail free card. Everything she says is manipulation.
Maybe she does see him as abusive in a way. E.g. he may have said some heated things when he found out she was leaving him for Jaimi, and to Jess this becomes “he’s always been homophobic.” She says he “told her she was tit at everything”, to Jess anything less than constant unconditional praise is telling her she’s tit at everything. But it is hypocritical to position herself as an expert and preach about not giving an abuser custody, when she allowed her kids to live with him. And this isn’t malicious gossip, she puts it out there; it’s apparent from her social media that her children do not live with her
Social Services have involved themselves in peoples lives when celebrities have been reported for publishing ill judged photographs of their kids.
Now we have someone who references her advanced level professional qualifications & who claims to have expertise & roles in the areas of female victimisation & is publicly suggesting that a former partner(s) behaved in a certain way that would raise concerns. If true, are those children safe in that environment?
In claiming her qualifications, expertise & experience in victimisation she expects to be treated as having more insight than Josephine public. With rights come responsibility. A Forensic Accountant living with someone undertaking money laundering will likely be held to a different standard than if that person were a florist.
Now we have someone who references her advanced level professional qualifications & who claims to have expertise & roles in the areas of female victimisation & is publicly suggesting that a former partner(s) behaved in a certain way that would raise concerns. If true, are those children safe in that environment?
In claiming her qualifications, expertise & experience in victimisation she expects to be treated as having more insight than Josephine public. With rights come responsibility. A Forensic Accountant living with someone undertaking money laundering will likely be held to a different standard than if that person were a florist.
And Alex wouldn't have even see these posts so they were not to appease him.
- Status