We, the public, clin psychs, counsellors, therapists, researchers, journalists and etc, will continue to share the truth, raise concerns and put pressure on the BPS, publicly. Their email “explanation” to SA is utterly deplorable! I have actually been a member of the BPS for many years purely for research and conference purposes. Today I have cancelled my subscriptions to all divisions. I have no doubt this whole mess will be reported in the media soon enough.I'd love to be proved wrong but I have zero faith that the BPS will do anything, as we have seen already. This has been discussed at length here. I'd genuinely be delighted if they did but
She isn’t qualified to do any sort of capacity assessment. She is not a qualified practitioner, nor does she do any clinical work. I doubt JT even knows what constitutes capacity.I mean with SAs permission, perhaps its a case of writing to every MH trust in the country and showing them screenshots that have been shared?
And book shop - i mean waterstones for instance have been very swift to remove gender critical views.
The other thing is - if SA was distressed at the time of consent, should JT done a capacity assessment to see whether SA was actually in a position to consent? It's a huge thing to take consent from a person who is distressed.
That was an attempt at sarcasm. I know how appalling Jessica is.Unfortunately they are a threat to academia. If they can get away with this level of consent and BPS back them up then what precedent does that set? How can any potential future participants trust researchers?
I have no doubt she would still have the front to say SA had capacity to make the decision for her personal story to be published in the book and that she, Dr Jess, was able to assess this herself.We, the public, clin psychs, counsellors, therapists, researchers, journalists and etc, will continue to share the truth, raise concerns and put pressure on the BPS, publicly. Their email “explanation” to SA is utterly deplorable! I have actually been a member of the BPS for many years purely for research and conference purposes. Today I have cancelled my subscriptions to all divisions. I have no doubt this whole mess will be reported in the media soon enough.
She isn’t qualified to do any sort of capacity assessment. She is not a qualified practitioner, nor does she do any clinical work. I doubt JT even knows what constitutes capacity.
She wrote about Rosie Flatman in her second book without consent even the publisher admits it but JT has been mainly silent about it instead preferring to go after Sally AnnI think the quote about the 2nd book is probably more pertinent to this situation. Even if you wave it under her nose she will dismiss it and block youHer and her fringe are Teflon coated.
Several people on here have made the point about her misleading people with the idea that she is either medically trained and/or has clinical training. It's entirely deliberate on her part.
According to the Wiki on here her CV is available on her LinkedIn profile. Someone here had also downloaded it. Maybe they can share. Think that there's more than one in circulation.She wrote about Rosie Flatman in her second book without consent even the publisher admits it but JT has been mainly silent about it instead preferring to go after Sally Ann
Can anyone point me in the direction of JT fictional CV please
They passed this complaint on to JT who assured them she had consent but the publisher clearly says no consent needed as not identifiable but it seems JT word was enough for the publisher RoseEmpower called JT out privately and got no response despite JT bombarding RoseEmpower with numerous messages about SA once she knew Rose had recognised Rosie in the book she went silent on them both.According to the Wiki on here her CV is available on her LinkedIn profile. Someone here had also downloaded it. Maybe they can share. Think that there's more than one in circulation.
I didn't know that the publisher had acknowledged that Rosie Flatman account was used without her permission. Do you have a link for that please?
Ah, yes. I remember now. Ugh, all this avoidance of the lack of consent about using survivors stories by a woman who calls her company Victim Focused is outrageous and absurd. She's a liar and a hypocrite.They passed this complaint on to JT who assured them she had consent but the publisher clearly says no consent needed as not identifiable but it seems JT word was enough for the publisher RoseEmpower called JT out privately and got no response despite JT bombarding RoseEmpower with numerous messages about SA once she knew Rose had recognised Rosie in the book she went silent on them both.
Her CV is available online somewhere - yes someone downloaded it. This is her LinkedIn: https://uk.linkedin.com/in/dr-jessica-taylor-5667351b2According to the Wiki on here her CV is available on her LinkedIn profile. Someone here had also downloaded it. Maybe they can share. Think that there's more than one in circulation.
I didn't know that the publisher had acknowledged that Rosie Flatman account was used without her permission. Do you have a link for that please?
That’s the watered down version I mean the full on full of shit CVHer CV is available online somewhere - yes someone downloaded it. This is her LinkedIn: https://uk.linkedin.com/in/dr-jessica-taylor-5667351b2
I know, she's an absolute piss taker. Presumably this is also the line she has used with the BPS and her publisher - it's all a smear campaign. She manages to be both perpetrator & victim in one fell swoop.
It’s not true that ‘all investigations found it hadn’t actually happened’, and Jessica is more aware than most about the important distinction between that and lack of evidence.
I was literally writing that first bit almost word for word as you posted. I’ve not seen one single investigation state that it hasn’t happened.It’s not true that ‘all investigations found it hadn’t actually happened’, and Jessica is more aware than most about the important distinction between that and lack of evidence.
As for not retaliating and stooping so low… her lack of self awareness is seriously concerning.
The full of shit CV was swiftly removed from the Internet immediately after it was discussed on here. But have no fear, I've found itThat’s the watered down version I mean the full on full of shit CV
Here it is.That’s the watered down version I mean the full on full of shit CV
Shell probably kick off saying it's doxxing, with the argument that she removed it, as is her right. All while refusing to remove Sally Anne's blog postThe full of shit CV was swiftly removed from the Internet immediately after it was discussed on here. But have no fear, I've found it
Wrong JT that’s an American with the same nameHere it is.
Shell probably kick off saying it's doxxing, with the argument that she removed it, as is her right. All while refusing to remove Sally Anne's blog post
ThanksThe full of shit CV was swiftly removed from the Internet immediately after it was discussed on here. But have no fear, I've found it
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?