More BBC shite.
Yeah I think that might be down to the fact that flu magically disappeared last year
Time to panic buy loo roll….
This bit stands out:Fook fact checkers and make your own minds up.Answering the critics of "Died Suddenly"
I respond to a critic and a "fact checker." You get to decide who is telling you the truth. Dr. Cole's open offer to view the clots: no takers!stevekirsch.substack.com
That seems such an odd one - for those cases presumably there's some sort of blood problem people had that meant they needed a transfusion? Otherwise it would have been seen on anyone who ever had an operation or serious accident.Over 100 embalmers are seeing “never before seen” clots only in people who have been vaccinated or received blood transfusions.
Blood transfusions are common after you've given birth .This bit stands out:
That seems such an odd one - for those cases presumably there's some sort of blood problem people had that meant they needed a transfusion? Otherwise it would have been seen on anyone who ever had an operation or serious accident.
That said, it sounds unusual enough that there's a decent chance someone somewhere has already done a paper on it and done the difficult bit of digging through heaps of notes and records.
Trying to quantify, a quick search says that's around 3% which sounds small but still adds up to a lot (not disputing 'common' btw) , so the 'had transfusion' group is getting quite big now.Blood transfusions are common after you've given birth .
Depends on how many transfusions were given post vaccine rollout throughout the world? Has the instances increased in the past couple of years ? it could be vaccine or covid related.Trying to quantify, a quick search says that's around 3% which sounds small but still adds up to a lot (not disputing 'common' btw) , so the 'had transfusion' group is getting quite big now.
I would certainly hope that the known causes of this type of clot were properly discounted first, before the apparent discovery of a new one was declared.
January 2021, surely not many expectant mothers vaccinated back then? I think it was encouraged but not prioritised, depending on how far the rollout had gone? Either way, definitely a significant increase on the 'had transfusion' group.Depends on how many transfusions were given post vaccine rollout throughout the world? Has the instances increased in the past couple of years ? it could be vaccine or covid related.
View attachment 1759228
That’s not vaccines that’s how many blood transfusions were being given at that time, an increase on the 3% from 2019January 2021, surely not many expectant mothers vaccinated back then? I think it was encouraged but not prioritised, depending on how far the rollout had gone? Either way, definitely a significant increase on the 'had transfusion' group.
This 100 embalmers one is strange. Funeral directors and morticians (embalmers) don't have access to confidential medical records, only the medical certificate of cause of death, which certainly won't include the deceased's covid vaccination status as standard. Same for transfusions. How would they know the deceased had at some time in the past xx months/years had a blood transfusion because, again, confidential on the patient's medical records, and won't be on the death certificate.This bit stands out:
That seems such an odd one - for those cases presumably there's some sort of blood problem people had that meant they needed a transfusion? Otherwise it would have been seen on anyone who ever had an operation or serious accident.
That said, it sounds unusual enough that there's a decent chance someone somewhere has already done a paper on it and done the difficult bit of digging through heaps of notes and records.