I took it in the nicest way possible as we're all general nobodies after all and I know you'd only want to be kind to us all.In the nicest way possible just general nobodies. Doubt any CEO would come to Tattle to defend their product.
Blackrock and Vanguard are usually in the top 5
for any listed company.
Pointing out misinformation doesn't equate to being "terrified of COVID"I didn’t say there is anything wrong with being 60, but she spends a lot of time online being preachy and posting peer reviewed studies and fact checks (yawn). I assumed she was of retirement age and bored, not a young woman in her 20s. Also being terrified of covid is not usual for such a young person who says they are also healthy, just a bit strange really.
still waiting on you to point out my misinformationPointing out misinformation doesn't equate to being "terrified of COVID"
How is that encourging people to tone police others!From who?!! Are you encouraging people to tone police others?!
I don't think either side that post on this thread should be pointing the finger about shadowy motivations to be honest.You are probably right. It's just hard to believe anyone would go to such lengths to protect corrupt big pharma. The mind boggles.
I have spoken about my experience of Covid-19 and the poster knows full well why I have been cautious because of how it hit me.Pointing out misinformation doesn't equate to being "terrified of COVID"
You said double standards in a response to someone suggesting anyone who is anti vax to call our other people for what they say, which in my opinion is asking them to change their tone - against the rules and you know it.How is that encourging people to tone police others!Double standards in terms of posters saying one thing about others - yet they are the ones doing it.
No. My response was about the double standards.You said double standards in a response to someone suggesting anyone who is anti vax to call our other people for what they say, which in my opinion is asking them to change their tone - against the rules and you know it.
Which was referring to someone not calling someone out on something no? Ok then. Seeing the big fella can’t speak for himself I apologise if I’ve picked you up wrong!No. My response was about the double standards.
Exactly. The ilk thing was another. I used the phrase "you and your ilk" on these threads a few months back to describe the anti vaccine posters and got criticised heavily for it. One poster claimed to be very offended by the term and even when I posted a dictionary definition of it to show it wasn't always meant as an insult, they didn't let up. (I meant it as "you and those who share your opinion".)How is that encourging people to tone police others!Double standards in terms of posters saying one thing about others - yet they are the ones doing it.
As you've said yourself, if you feel someone has broken the rules, please do report it.You said double standards in a response to someone suggesting anyone who is anti vax to call our other people for what they say, which in my opinion is asking them to change their tone - against the rules and you know it.
No I was not referencing that part. My reply was in agreement about the double standards. You have and I have explained it again.Which was referring to someone not calling someone out on something no? Ok then. Seeing the big fella can’t speak for himself I apologise if I’ve picked you up wrong!
I apologised, you’ve no need to be a dick about it.No I was not referencing that part. My reply was in agreement about the double standards. You have and I have explained it again.
Indeed! Calm down, Ems.So much anger in here today, it’s like a cauldron bubbling away!
Yes I do remember you using it and someone got upset by the term.Exactly. The ilk thing was another. I used the phrase "you and your ilk" on these threads a few months back to describe the anti vaccine posters and got criticised heavily for it. One poster claimed to be very offended by the term and even when I posted a dictionary definition of it to show it wasn't always meant as an insult, they didn't let up. (I meant it as "you and those who share your opinion".)
However, now someone against the vaccines has used it and we didn't hear a peep.
I should add that I didn't mind the phrase being used today by an anti vaccine poster as I stand by what I said originally - ie it's not intended to be an offensive attack and therefore it's fine to use here.
As you've said yourself, if you feel someone has broken the rules, please do report it.
I’m not. No need to name call.I apologised, you’ve no need to be a dick about it.
I didn’t call you a name. Dick is used to describe your behaviour, not you as a person. This is boring now, please just give up you don’t need to always get the last word in.I’m not. No need to name call.
Sorry but this is classic. I went to look up the reaction to when I used the phrase "you and your ilk" and found this:You aren’t breaking anything to me.
The fact of the matter is these people could well have all survived and thrived with or without vaccines. That’s why you and your ilk should stop looking down your nose at people who make an informed choice not to vaccinate. They aren’t the be all and end all, they are one measure that can be used by those who wish to use it in a toolbox full of many other measures that may be equally or even more effective.
Yeah I noticed it started on Monday when Ensay was going on about ‘anti vax shite’. You can really see the anger in their posts the last few days, and that new poster that has joined the thread, they seem very angry and argumentative for some reason. It’s possibly someone that used to post here that made a new account.So much anger in here today, it’s like a cauldron bubbling away!
Why am I not allowed to say it if you said it?Sorry but this is classic. I went to look up the reaction to when I used the phrase "you and your ilk" and found this:
COVID-19 vaccine #16 & general vaccine conversation
"Don't have any other argument"? Do any of us have lots of arguments in this thread? It's about the covid vaccine and -- if we're honest -- the main two sides of the argument are people who didn't take the vaccine and those that did. The former generally justify their choice by posting lots of...tattle.life
A post from you criticising me for using the very phrase you've just used.
Stalker behaviour 🫣Why am I not allowed to say it if you said it?
Is it only ok when you do it?
Must have taken you a long time to find that seeing my settings are private - you said that to me too
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?