Just curious then why do you not believe the vaccine is involved in RHS in the case study then if the researchers conclude thatās likely the cause of it?No double standards on my side.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Nowhere in my comments have I said this. I have just pointed out it is a case study of one individual and no definite association was concluded.
Apparently it was removed after it was leaked into the public domainNo double standards on my side.
They donāt link anything in relation to those percentages.
So do you believe the vaccine is likely the cause then or not because your previous comments give the impression you donāt believe it? Came across very dismissive of it even.
Heres another case, this time a female.
Ramsay Hunt syndrome following mRNA SARS-COV-2 vaccine
I cannot say as the study does not have a definitive conclusion and in their analysis, the p value was 0.07 which means it is not a significant result.So do you believe the vaccine is likely the cause then or not because your previous comments give the impression you donāt believe it? Came across very dismissive of it even.
Heres another case, this time a female.
Ramsay Hunt syndrome following mRNA SARS-COV-2 vaccine
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Thats fine youāre entitled to believe what you do. I respect weāre all different here.
Your rationale behind this vs the Mrs Beiber case is why I say itās double standards, because Mrs Beibers case was also a small isolated sample and yet you were quite certain those doctors in her case were right. So much so that you shared it more than once as a āgotchaā and refuted any other suggestion as to why she had a blood clot. Her case wasnāt a clear cut 100% explanation either but you believed that one anyway!
There was no mention of the vaccine regarding factors her doctors were considering. I didnāt share it as a gotcha. I wouldnāt say she is a small isolated sample, many people have suffered what she has, blood clots and heart related issues but it was not the vaccine.
Yes, we certainly believe different things and have our opinions.
Vaccine aside - why did you believe their conclusion as what caused the blood clot if it was only a one person sample if thatās the reason you donāt believe the researchers in both of those case studies I shared.
Not to mention the cases I shared were on recognised and reputable platforms. Mrs Beibers case is going off her account and interpretation only, that was shared on social media - I thought that was frowned upon to give credibility to anecdotes shared on social media platforms.
The study you posted, the researcher themselves said there is no definitive association. I am just repeating myself here, have already discussed this at length and I really donāt fancy repeating myself any further.
No problem at all! No answer is an answer. Iām just explaining why I feel youāve double standards so you donāt feel Iām plucking it out of thin air.
I donāt know what else to add to this conversation. I think weāve spoken at length about it and could probably publish our very own case study about it.
You could always answer the questions you skim by and donāt acknowledgeI donāt know what else to add to this conversation. I think weāve spoken at length about it and could probably publish our very own case study about it.
now thereās an idea to keep us all out of trouble. Youād have to declare all your bias though 
All jokes aside hopefully this is the first of many to get compensated for their injuryās from vaccination
āWhatās done is doneā: Okanagan man one of the first in Canada to be compensated for vaccine injury | Globalnews.ca
The husband and father of two young boys was diagnosed with the disorder less than two weeks after receiving the Astrazeneca COVID-19 vaccine last spring.
globalnews.ca
The way I see it is you're saying there's no definitive proof that the vaccine was the cause, which doesn't mean it isn't, just that we can't say for sure that is or isn't based on the information available.I donāt know what else to add to this conversation. I think weāve spoken at length about it and could probably publish our very own case study about it.
Which sounds logical to me.
There is definitely a majority here in terms of opinion but I also think it is important for discussion to be had from another perspective/viewpoint/opinion/belief/whatever you want to call it.
I have acknowledged things more than I needed to. For what? Just repeating myself. My only bias is #FundedByPfizer.You could always answer the questions you skim by and donāt acknowledge
All jokes aside hopefully this is the first of many to get compensated for their injuryās from vaccination
āWhatās done is doneā: Okanagan man one of the first in Canada to be compensated for vaccine injury | Globalnews.ca
The husband and father of two young boys was diagnosed with the disorder less than two weeks after receiving the Astrazeneca COVID-19 vaccine last spring.
Thank you, there wasnāt anything more to it. š„²
Yea you know what, you are so right. Entirely logical to believe a personal account on a YouTube vlog and at the same time deny 2 published case studies were the researchers believe the vaccine is likely to be responsible.
I didnāt deny.
Please can you not twist what I have said.You said the sample was too small for you to be sure, but yet a personal vlog on YouTube is enough size of a sample for you to be certain. Thatās denial in my eyes, you disagree, youāve made clear youāve nothing further to say on it.I didnāt deny.
The researchers themselves did not say it was a definitive association, hardly denial.
No I donāt have any further to say but will speak up as you are twisting what I have said.
Everyone here can read. The researchers believe itās likely the cause. A bit like the YouTube video said she believed her doctors thought it was likely x y and z. Both werenāt 100% definitive but you chose to only believe the social media platform because apparently 2 cases have a smaller sample size than 1 anecdotal experience - thatās cool Iām not arguing or trying to prove you otherwise nor am I twisting anything.
You have, by saying I have denied/dismissed it is the vaccine when all I have said is there is no definitive association.
There was NO mention of the vaccine in any report regarding Hailey, if the doctors are able to talk about the pill, Covid-19 infection or a long haul flight as potential factors, they are just as capable of talking about a vaccine.
Over and out.
- Status