Yeah, I like to live on the risky side. I don’t think my cleansers are Mufasa Hirons approved either.Dude, you washing your face in the shower? #queensaysno #readthebible #freakswillfreak
Yeah, I like to live on the risky side. I don’t think my cleansers are Mufasa Hirons approved either.Dude, you washing your face in the shower? #queensaysno #readthebible #freakswillfreak
Did your face melt off? I assume that’s what happens…Man, I should join that group and tell them what I've done today....I went to the beach wearing only SPF 30!
Go one, use a face wipe. You know you want toIt's still here. Obvs I'll have ALL THE SUN DAMAGE but I'm on holiday so...sod it. I've only washed it in the shower, too...
I used a facewipe yesterday. Had a short break away and could not be arsed to lug X amount of skincare bits with me. So a Johnson's wipe it wasGo one, use a face wipe. You know you want to
And interestingly, the follow on blog post has zero mention of it being an ad/press samples. No mention of how these wonderful makeup products landed on her desk in fact.You're not part of the press therefore this is an ad (and if you were it'd still be an ad!)View attachment 769277
I totally agree. It seems mean to say it which I have - sort of unsisterly. In fact I would couch it in terms of for all the free stuff she gets, which is a shed load, and tweakments etc she looks no better than most of us (I bet). It really does beg the question wtf is the point? She just looks OK and normal. And for all the hugely expensive gunk she is gifted it is quite reassuring, to me anyway, that it doesn't seem to make much difference.Does anyone else think that for someone who is a self-proclaimed skincare messiah and all round product aficionado, CH does not actually look that great? Her attitude and following aside, I wouldn't feel inclined to take note of someone who chops and changes products so often and doesn't actually look that great for all her 'knowledge'?
I said the same when I first joined this thread. I followed her for a bit before I saw what she looked like, I was expecting to see someone with dazzling, perfect skin, given her 'knowledge' and all the fancy products she has access to. I was really surprised when I saw her.Does anyone else think that for someone who is a self-proclaimed skincare messiah and all round product aficionado, CH does not actually look that great? Her attitude and following aside, I wouldn't feel inclined to take note of someone who chops and changes products so often and doesn't actually look that great for all her 'knowledge'?
I agree - the amount of media promo/products that are either ads or in some other way not organically recommended on their merit also puts me off as I feel that she doesn't really have much of a core routine and the vast amount of products she goes through then another is in favour the next week loses my interest. It doesn't feel like she is genuinely into any of them and a bit more like just shilling productsI totally agree. It seems mean to say it which I have - sort of unsisterly. In fact I would couch it in terms of for all the free stuff she gets, which is a shed load, and tweakments etc she looks no better than most of us (I bet). It really does beg the question wtf is the point? She just looks OK and normal. And for all the hugely expensive gunk she is gifted it is quite reassuring, to me anyway, that it doesn't seem to make much difference.
Her and all the freaks always say that the only thing that will make any difference is botox and filler yet still search for the holy grail cream and insist creams etc will do itI totally agree. It seems mean to say it which I have - sort of unsisterly. In fact I would couch it in terms of for all the free stuff she gets, which is a shed load, and tweakments etc she looks no better than most of us (I bet). It really does beg the question wtf is the point? She just looks OK and normal. And for all the hugely expensive gunk she is gifted it is quite reassuring, to me anyway, that it doesn't seem to make much difference.
Her hair is so ageing! If she put some lowlights in and toned it all down it would look so much better.Her hair colour is very aging I think. And her hair looks in bad condition. So free cut and colour not really worth it.
Ha sorry, just basically said the same thing.Her and all the freaks always say that the only thing that will make any difference is botox and filler yet still search for the holy grail cream and insist creams etc will do it
this is an exact example of why I don't rate her credibilityHer and all the freaks always say that the only thing that will make any difference is botox and filler yet still search for the holy grail cream and insist creams etc will do it
I feel a bit bitchy saying this, but I was actually shocked when I found out how old she was. I "dicovered" her in around 2011 or 2012 and thought she was in her fifties.I totally agree. It seems mean to say it which I have - sort of unsisterly. In fact I would couch it in terms of for all the free stuff she gets, which is a shed load, and tweakments etc she looks no better than most of us (I bet). It really does beg the question wtf is the point? She just looks OK and normal. And for all the hugely expensive gunk she is gifted it is quite reassuring, to me anyway, that it doesn't seem to make much difference.