while I'm sure it would be ethnically questionable for a therapist to look at a patient's SM, in babs' case it seems entirely justified. ALL her issues stem from SM and the fact that she has chosen a "career" where she bases her self worth on the number of likes and followers she receives. we all know babnocchio will have described her "werk" as an influenza as being all about her, a body confident role model with a commitment to making people smile, especially over the past year, and documenting her family life as a "mummy blogger". unless her groupon counsellor actually takes a look at her SM, she will have no idea how inaccurately babs has described her "job", or why people are so critical of her behaviour. if she babs' true content - the exploitation of her kids, her obsession with making everything as crude as possible, her narcissism, the "no-one is ever allowed to have a different opinion to me" boundaries she enforces, the absolute lack fo effort she puts into her poor quality ads, the way she blatantly promotes favouritism of the golden child over her son and emasculates her husband, she'd understand that babs is not a victim of "trolling", but that people are understandbly co cerned about the risks she's putting her kids at, in terms of potential bullying and also the potentially horrendous consequences of her sharing photos of her kids in their swimsuits, showing off their underwear and allowing photos of them to be shared in porn sites. without actually seeing her SM, she will have absolutely concept of what she's dealing with - especially as babs clearly makes a point of making herself appear as vulnerable as possible on therapy days - totally unaware that babs is well-known for her gunt/boobs/crotch flashing, aggressive and humiliating behaviour. babs' SM reveals her true personality, behind the faux YT "amazing mum" bullshit persona she presents - which i assume is the way she acts during therapy.