Britney has been attacking her family, that would her children's family, including KF for a while. People are now speaking up. As for taking the high road, yes she should, as a parent. If KF is the complete deadbeat pot smoking loser she says he is. she should set an example for her children. What she seems to want and what you would accept is her attacking people and everyone else shutting up. That's not the real world.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
The difference is Britney has valid reasons to be angry and to lash out whereas anything coming out of Jaydens and Kevins mouths is a load of rubbish and they're worried they won't be able to free load off her anymore like they have been for years
Also if Kfed was such a druggie waste of space would the children even have gone to him? He must be able to put up some kind of grown up, function human being act to have bought up two boys for 16 years.
Except you have no basis for it being ‘a load of rubbish’
Jayden probably feels he has valid reasons to be angry. He essentially has not had a relationship with his mum for years and now doesn’t feel that is being mended or helped by Britney even now she is ‘free’.
Last edited:
See that is where we must disagree, a minor child has the right to be angry with his parent for their actions and, further, a child cannot 'freeload' off their parent who had a responsibility to support them. A parent needs to PARENT their child, she has not done that. As she has been incapable for whatever reason for doing so KF has done that job. He has been paid by Britney for doing that job. Just as any other primary parent would have been paid. She isn't the first celebrity to pay through the nose in child support, that is why people have children with celebrities; albeit it is usually the woman taking the payout. The difference is usually the paying parent has a relationship with the child. Why would it suit Jayden, if he is only interested in Britney's money, to ruin his relationship with Britney? as you say her need to 'pay' ends shortly, why wouldn't he be trying to keep a relationship so she will continue to support him? maybe because his interest goes beyond financial.
Exactly, if he was such a druggie he wouldn't have been given custody. Besides the boys; or at least Jayden seems a well adjusted nice teen.
Has her mum or sister said anything recently? I think it would have been more interesting if they had spoken out publicly about what was really going on. Maybe their silence speaks volumes.
Kids “freeloading” off of their parent from the age of 0-16… sure, very logical.
If K-Fed wasn’t in the picture… they’d have gone to Britneys parents… who are also apparently freeloaders. Her sister? A freeloader. Brother? A freeloader.
SoI guess the best outcome for them would have been to go into care with nobody and be lost in the system for the last 16 years (if they survived) just so they didn’t end up spoiled by having their care being paid for by their own mother, who is a multi-millionaire several times over. Brilliant idea. God forbid the children of celebrities benefit from their extreme wealth while dealing with all the bullshit that comes with having parents in the public eye - these boys didn’t ask for any of this and it’s been chaos since literally the day they were born.
I think Kevin was addicted to McDonald’s at one point.
To be fair he does look like food is now addiction, quite a change from the dancer days!
His nickname really suits him K-Fed 
I absolutely assure you that fact-checkers have contacted Kevin and he knows what Britney is saying about him in the book. It may well have been what led to him giving the interview.
The contents of the book are only a mystery to the reading public. The publisher, editor, fact-checkers, and those named therein know what the claims are, and I would not be surprised if their inability to verify those claims is what's leading to the book's delay.
Once again -- who the hell are you to speak so confidently about the validity of their statements? Are you personally involved? Do you know *any* of the individuals whose motives you feel so comfortable speaking authoritatively about?
The simple fact that a wealthy white woman who was the sole earner in the marriage lost custody to a non-working father itself speaks VOLUMES. Family courts in the US, and in California especially, *strongly* favor the mother. The degree of dangerous behavior Britney would have had to exhibit to lose custody is pretty bonkers and points to her incapacity, at least at that time, unless you are one of those truly far-side-of-the-moon stans who seem to think that the US judicial system is set up to harm Britney Spears specifically.
Last edited:
Britney did, tho. She griped that Kevin was not allowing her to see the kids when the boys were just babies. Kevin's attorney barked back immediately, as her recollection was inaccurate. I kind of feel that is what started this whole back and forth. Britney started it.
If the roles were reversed and Kevin was the mom in this situation he wouldn’t be getting as much slack for making the decision to be a stay at home dad. My only issue is he seemingly supports his other kids with Britney’s money which is wrong.
either way when you make the decision to have kids with someone, you should expect if you separate that you’ll be paying support.
either way when you make the decision to have kids with someone, you should expect if you separate that you’ll be paying support.
Sam is the bottom and Britney is the top.
Do you have any children yourself Spindlewhorl? I cant imagine anyone that does talking about them the way you do.
You really can’t reason with someone who thinks a child being dependent on a parent is freeloading
Last edited:
Or K-FC FedHis nickname really suits him K-Fed
Rumour is he’s blackmailing her with other footage from the boys and is getting double what she’s court ordered to pay him
- Status