I was going to post this one on the conspiracy thread as a suggestion of something to be wary of but I really can't be arsed with the kind of argument that would kick off so I'll leave it here on the off chance..
There's a clip of what I guess is a radio show where someone googles a UK gov report and then reads out a scary sounding death figure without saying what it actually is, and then a certain Mr Fox tweets this and nobody asks 'are you sure this means what he says it means'?
Reluctant as I am to help the 'other side' as it were, the figures they quote are from a table that's immediately after two short paragraphs headed "Interpretation of the data" that somehow seems to have been left unread.
The table only covers deaths among people ill enough to have needed emergency care, not the population as a whole and in case anyone missed the mumbled remark, was the figure for the over 80's so it's pretty much meaningless outside of that very specific context, of over 80s who have needed emergency care.
I admit I had a head start because I was already familiar with the reports, FWIW he is quoting from the latest one, no.25.
This isn't even "debunking", no fancy fact checker sites because it's right there in the same report.
There's stuff that's worth basing an argument on and there's stuff that isn't - figures trivially shown as misleading fall well within the "isn't".