Agree. Very sad to have to add it to all her bios as if she spent years there. She would have been very very junior too. Also the BBH month? Was she sacked as she wasn’t up to the job?I find it sad that she refers to her marketing days as a career- she left at 23 when she had her family (go feminist!). If she had got a university degree that would've been a whole 2 years of "career". Even if she started at 18, 5 years is really nothing.
Quite depressing really that she keeps hanging on to this.
She couldn't hack it. In one of her posts she says that although she felt comfortable dealing with digital marketing, other forms were beyond her scope. Didn't get on with one of the managers and didn't like the hours, also, ironically in light of recent events, there might have been something about relocating to London.Agree. Very sad to have to add it to all her bios as if she spent years there. She would have been very very junior too. Also the BBH month? Was she sacked as she wasn’t up to the job?
Ah Ok.BBH was the one she got made redundant from.
Eliiots (interestingly not even on her LinkedIn) was the one she couldn't hack. Over promoted to Marketing Director and she hated the female boss and she wrote some pretty scathing blog posts about how horrible she was.
Such a good feminist!!!BBH was the one she got made redundant from.
Eliiots (interestingly not even on her LinkedIn) was the one she couldn't hack. Over promoted to Marketing Director and she hated the female boss and she wrote some pretty scathing blog posts about how horrible she was.
Her linked in says September 2011The timelines don't fit. When does she claim she left VICE?
She’s probably running it as a sole trader. Alice JT trading as XYZ. Unless it says “Slay Limited” anywhere, in which case she’s lyingSo if Alice is running this award winning Slay company, how come there seems to be no record of it OR her on Companies House?
Unless I’m mistaken/she’s using a different name, she’s not on there as associated with any companies at all, whereas Dan has loads...
Nope - she never went back after having her eldest which was mid 2010. She may have been on the payroll until then but I believe she finished working a month before her daughter was born and never went back.Her linked in says September 2011
Maybe it was her mat leave + notice (which she had probably accrued as annual leave).Nope - she never went back after having her eldest which was mid 2010. She may have been on the payroll until then but I believe she finished working a month before her daughter was born and never went back.
What a blaggerNope - she never went back after having her eldest which was mid 2010. She may have been on the payroll until then but I believe she finished working a month before her daughter was born and never went back.
Yes that is what I meant. She’s claimed in the past of working for Vice for 4 years - firstly it wasn’t 4 years, it was 3 years 7 months but only 2 years 5 months of actual working. But hey, what’s a few years to get in the way of reality? Her job history is jumpy as hell - no longevity at all. Kind of like her relationships.Maybe it was her mat leave + notice (which she had probably accrued as annual leave).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?