Is this from Facebook ?Oh diddums first world problem there jackhis mars bars will melt
He’s a cheeky bastard not addressing his 100k followers he buzzed over with some of them daft balloons. Idiot!
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
He’s a cheeky bastard not addressing his 100k followers he buzzed over with some of them daft balloons. Idiot!
Why didn't you let us know earlier Faulty. We'd have started you a go fund me page to raise money for a battery operated hand fan from poundlandOh diddums first world problem there jack
Has anyone seen one of his recent posts on Facebook about calories vs syns.. he is so rude to people like seriously!
Wtf just looked. Such a self righteous and argumentative twit!!!
Whilst i get the actual post completely, did he need to be so rude to the people commenting?
Can you post it? Pretty please
Whilst i get the actual post completely, did he need to be so rude to the people commenting?
Can you post it? Pretty please
Attachments
The post I fully agree with. SW is bollocks IMO but he is much worse.
Whilst i get the actual post completely, did he need to be so rude to the people commenting?
He makes me laugh - he is paving the way to come out and say he has ditched SW as he has thought about it and decided he needs to change then out will come "oh i now follow the LDN cutting guide for my workout and im following their meal plan".
He forgets all those followers who got him the spice freebies and muscle food stuff along with all the other freebies. He got what he wanted and has literally thrown them away now he has the surgery and his new "life". Won't be long and he will have a public profile once again and I hope they unfollow in their thousands to teach him a lesson
He forgets all those followers who got him the spice freebies and muscle food stuff along with all the other freebies. He got what he wanted and has literally thrown them away now he has the surgery and his new "life". Won't be long and he will have a public profile once again and I hope they unfollow in their thousands to teach him a lesson
I think SW is good in that it encourages you to eat fruit and veg, lean meat etc and limits dairy and wheat which humans shouldn't really consume much of anyway. It's clearly effective for people who may not be destined to gravitate to the healthiest eating habits and unfortunately for some people it is just a fact that they will never be the best eaters (or have any interest in being so). However, I take umbrage with the way that the few idiots who follow it see it as a free pass to eat crappy food every day, which is not something anyone should be doing. E.g. people who save their syns to have pudding every day; that is just not necessary for anyone and all it does is decrease people's tolerance for eating more cleanly. You don't need an ice cream sundae or pancakes after eating three square meals a day. You don't need treats every day because all that does is make you see food as a reward as opposed to fuel for your body!
Another thing I do not agree with is that they dont seem to have any issue with pushing the consumption of processed, chemical-laden foods onto people. It's not okay to eat minced meat, bacon, fat free yogurts and diet drinks every day. Yes, I know that people not on SW do this, but these foods, whilst they may not promote weight gain, have been linked to certain types of cancer, osteoporosis, hormonal problems, diabetes, etc etc. SW has a duty to communicate the facts to people and promote the idea that some calorie dense foods are healthier than others - I.e. avocados, butter (instead of margarine pumped full of hydrogenated tit), olives, oily fish, nuts etc. There doesn't seem to be any value placed on factoring whole foods into your diet.
In their defence though and in response to the infographic he shared, it is better for everyone to eat whole fruit instead of mashed or blended mainly because it takes about 10 minutes to eat a banana but if you wanted to you could down a smoothie in 2 minutes, and they usually contain at least 2 bananas plus many other fruits. I understand the concept of synning how you consume foods as well as the foods themselves. In addition, avocados are very good for you but they are very high in fat so the average person should only have about half of one per day. I also suspected thay they started synning mullerlights because they are a much easier food to abuse and eat unnecessarily high volumes of than other unsynned foods like veg and meat etc, they still have calories, AND they are processed so it probably is better to only have one a day anyway. That's more about health than weight loss. The pasta thing again is to encourage people to eat high volumes of more satiating food. It's better to eat a plate full of pasta and syn free sauce for about 600 cals than it would be to eat 2 chocolate bars.
The person who made the image kind of missed the point; that SW isn't about calories in calories out, it is one type of diet that whilst it may not be healthy and has many faults, genuinely does work well for some people. I am not defending it 100% because it didnt work for me; what helped for me was psychotherapy to heal my very bad relationship with food. But I will never write it off completely because like anything, it does work for some people. It just needs to be approached sensibly and with some common sense.
Thank you for coming to my TED talk
Another thing I do not agree with is that they dont seem to have any issue with pushing the consumption of processed, chemical-laden foods onto people. It's not okay to eat minced meat, bacon, fat free yogurts and diet drinks every day. Yes, I know that people not on SW do this, but these foods, whilst they may not promote weight gain, have been linked to certain types of cancer, osteoporosis, hormonal problems, diabetes, etc etc. SW has a duty to communicate the facts to people and promote the idea that some calorie dense foods are healthier than others - I.e. avocados, butter (instead of margarine pumped full of hydrogenated tit), olives, oily fish, nuts etc. There doesn't seem to be any value placed on factoring whole foods into your diet.
In their defence though and in response to the infographic he shared, it is better for everyone to eat whole fruit instead of mashed or blended mainly because it takes about 10 minutes to eat a banana but if you wanted to you could down a smoothie in 2 minutes, and they usually contain at least 2 bananas plus many other fruits. I understand the concept of synning how you consume foods as well as the foods themselves. In addition, avocados are very good for you but they are very high in fat so the average person should only have about half of one per day. I also suspected thay they started synning mullerlights because they are a much easier food to abuse and eat unnecessarily high volumes of than other unsynned foods like veg and meat etc, they still have calories, AND they are processed so it probably is better to only have one a day anyway. That's more about health than weight loss. The pasta thing again is to encourage people to eat high volumes of more satiating food. It's better to eat a plate full of pasta and syn free sauce for about 600 cals than it would be to eat 2 chocolate bars.
The person who made the image kind of missed the point; that SW isn't about calories in calories out, it is one type of diet that whilst it may not be healthy and has many faults, genuinely does work well for some people. I am not defending it 100% because it didnt work for me; what helped for me was psychotherapy to heal my very bad relationship with food. But I will never write it off completely because like anything, it does work for some people. It just needs to be approached sensibly and with some common sense.
Thank you for coming to my TED talk
Last edited:
Boak!
Clever! Its diverted the conversation away from the fraud Mr Faulty Towers has committed!!
Anyone heading to Ralph Lauren outlet in Ashford at the weekend?
I really wonder what his response would be if someone called him out in public. Bet he would fully tit himself and end up being a defensive, arrogant, prick.
I totally get that SW works for some people, but some it’s ways enable people to live off processed crap and it doesn’t always address people’s issues with food. But each to their own.
But what’s gets me more is he never really followed SW, he did low/no carbs. He never has his HExbs. That’s why he lost so much IMO.
But what’s gets me more is he never really followed SW, he did low/no carbs. He never has his HExbs. That’s why he lost so much IMO.
I went on sat wasnt there went tues wasnt there went yesterday wasnt there i didnt ask for him tho either HAS HE LEFT???
Totally agree. The way SW demonises really good fats in favour of man made shite has put me off the diet completely.I think SW is good in that it encourages you to eat fruit and veg, lean meat etc and limits dairy and wheat which humans shouldn't really consume much of anyway. It's clearly effective for people who may not be destined to gravitate to the healthiest eating habits and unfortunately for some people it is just a fact that they will never be the best eaters (or have any interest in being so). However, I take umbrage with the way that the few idiots who follow it see it as a free pass to eat crappy food every day, which is not something anyone should be doing. E.g. people who save their syns to have pudding every day; that is just not necessary for anyone and all it does is decrease people's tolerance for eating more cleanly. You don't need an ice cream sundae or pancakes after eating three square meals a day. You don't need treats every day because all that does is make you see food as a reward as opposed to fuel for your body!
Another thing I do not agree with is that they dont seem to have any issue with pushing the consumption of processed, chemical-laden foods onto people. It's not okay to eat minced meat, bacon, fat free yogurts and diet drinks every day. Yes, I know that people not on SW do this, but these foods, whilst they may not promote weight gain, have been linked to certain types of cancer, osteoporosis, hormonal problems, diabetes, etc etc. SW has a duty to communicate the facts to people and promote the idea that some calorie dense foods are healthier than others - I.e. avocados, butter (instead of margarine pumped full of hydrogenated tit), olives, oily fish, nuts etc. There doesn't seem to be any value placed on factoring whole foods into your diet.
In their defence though and in response to the infographic he shared, it is better for everyone to eat whole fruit instead of mashed or blended mainly because it takes about 10 minutes to eat a banana but if you wanted to you could down a smoothie in 2 minutes, and they usually contain at least 2 bananas plus many other fruits. I understand the concept of synning how you consume foods as well as the foods themselves. In addition, avocados are very good for you but they are very high in fat so the average person should only have about half of one per day. I also suspected thay they started synning mullerlights because they are a much easier food to abuse and eat unnecessarily high volumes of than other unsynned foods like veg and meat etc, they still have calories, AND they are processed so it probably is better to only have one a day anyway. That's more about health than weight loss. The pasta thing again is to encourage people to eat high volumes of more satiating food. It's better to eat a plate full of pasta and syn free sauce for about 600 cals than it would be to eat 2 chocolate bars.
The person who made the image kind of missed the point; that SW isn't about calories in calories out, it is one type of diet that whilst it may not be healthy and has many faults, genuinely does work well for some people. I am not defending it 100% because it didnt work for me; what helped for me was psychotherapy to heal my very bad relationship with food. But I will never write it off completely because like anything, it does work for some people. It just needs to be approached sensibly and with some common sense.
Thank you for coming to my TED talk
Last edited:
He's been on holiday, think he came back today
Weird that he has his Instagram handle as his Facebook bio even though he deactivated ages ago? Also surprised his Facebook is so public now as I’m pretty sure it was private a month or so ago?
Jack didn’t really follow SW to lose his weight anyways. He rarely had carbs. He didn’t follow the SW rules. He used it to get followers, and now he’s working his way out from that label
- Status