Puzzles what you think and feel? I think that many of us now feel this way. I too have stopped following all.
mukbangs < make me laugh. Why would anyone want to see someone eating? Surely it has to be a fetish?Posing the question: and I wonder if her threads here will then need to be relocated under a nonhealth category? Does this happen, is this a normal thing, if an 'influencer' tries to capitalise off of a health crisis, but then shifts to a more general focus (even if the actual substance of their earlier content mostly didn't fit under their sensational topic titles all along anyway)? Is this part of a standard playbook, as we've seen so many of Tiffany's tricks to monetise her channel have been, a very known and common roll out used by numerous others to increase their audience and sub engagement levels, then return to a more general focus in hopes of sustaining interest in their content as a foreseeable continuing career?
I am curious how many of her followers will endure if she switches back to mukbangs, clothing and makeup. I wonder if she's hired or sought counsel from a PR agent to date or to make the intended transition. I daresay that, while some 'influencers' may be upset about being chatted about on Tattle, (they are likely jarred when first coming across the existence of and contents here; I know, admittedly, I was, too [it grows on you, though, lol]). But, there is also certainly far more "colourful" commentary here on TL besides that made towards health IG posters. Far, far more explicit and descriptive comments can be found elsewhere here.
There is an aphorism: "there is no such thing as bad publicity". Tiffany and others may find that to be true should interest in them markedly wane, for one reason or another. Bad publicity may not be the worse thing they encounter in their efforts at popularising an internet revenue stream (once they adjust their sensibilities to the content here and learn to appreciate its importance in counteracting a very one-sided plotted narrative [the book 1984 comes to mind, how "truth" is so easily changed and manipulated for an ulterior motive and how dissent is crushed in order to control the fabricated storyline of "reality"]).
No, criticism is not the worse thing to face a person who is monetising a personal, scripted narrative for financial gain. It's irrelevance and total viewer disinterest in them at all.
According to wiki, its meant to be educational. I think T is a tad rubbish at educating.
A mukbang or meokbang (Korean: 먹방, pronounced [mʌk̚.p͈aŋ] (
A mukbang is usually prerecorded or streamed live through a webcast on streaming platforms such as AfreecaTV, YouTube, TikTok, and Twitch. In the live version, the mukbang host chats with the audience while the audience type in real-time in the live chat room. Eating shows are expanding their influence on internet broadcasting platforms and serve as a virtual community and a venue for active communication among internet users.[2][3][4][5]
Mukbangers in Asia and North America have gained popularity on social media and made mukbang a career with high income. By cooking and consuming food on camera for a large audience, mukbangers generate income from advertising, sponsorships, endorsements, as well as viewers' support.[6] However, there has been growing criticism of mukbang's promotion of unhealthy eating habits, animal cruelty, and food waste.[7][8][9]
