I’m sure out of the blue she will one day reappear and once again her camera will be off and running for her new refashioned YT channel… whatever that may be
Posing the question: and I wonder if her threads here will then need to be relocated under a nonhealth category? Does this happen, is this a normal thing, if an
'influencer
' tries to capitalise off of a health crisis, but then shifts to a more general focus (even if the actual
substance of their earlier content mostly didn't fit under their sensational topic titles all along anyway)? Is this part of a standard playbook, as we've seen so many of Tiffany's tricks to monetise her channel have been, a very known and common roll out used by numerous others to increase their audience and sub engagement levels, then return to a more general focus in hopes of sustaining interest in their content as a foreseeable continuing career?
I am curious how many of her followers will endure if she switches back to mukbangs, clothing and makeup. I wonder if she's hired or sought counsel from a PR agent to date or to make the intended transition. I daresay that, while some
'influencers
' may be upset about being chatted about on Tattle, (they are likely jarred when first coming across the existence of and contents here; I know, admittedly, I was, too [it grows on you, though, lol
]). But, there is also certainly
far more "colourful" commentary here on TL besides that made towards health IG posters.
Far, far more explicit and descriptive comments can be found elsewhere here. Certainly, the more materialistic, hyperbolic and self aggrandising the
'influencer
', the stronger the 'feedback' found here. It's not unique or personal, it's very formulaic and easily predictable and seems to be in direct proportion to the same characteristics of the
'influencer
' themself and their channel that trigger the viewer to want to comment here.
There is an aphorism: "there is no such thing as bad publicity". Tiffany and others may find that to be true should interest in them markedly wane, for one reason or another. Bad publicity may not be the worse thing they encounter in their efforts at popularising an internet revenue stream (once they adjust their sensibilities to the content here and learn to appreciate its importance in counteracting a very one-sided plotted narrative [the book 1984 comes to mind, how "truth" is so easily changed and manipulated for an ulterior motive and how dissent is crushed in order to control the fabricated storyline of "reality"]).
No, criticism is not the worse thing to face a person who is monetising a personal, scripted narrative for financial gain. It's irrelevance and total viewer disinterest in them at all.
‘quite the Royal Tosser’ … you certainly think your tit don’t stink if you’re called that! 
! I’m sure he’s aware of that, just prefers to act thick and blank 
… she’s a master (mistress) at leading people on. All part of the bankroll $$$ !
