There's being chill and there's thatAlso think she using filters or photoshopping herself in her pictures of herself. The photos from the Very shoot look more like the old Naomi vs the new Naomi. Also what’s happened her teeth, they’re beyond white…is it filters, lighting or is she ateing the spotlight whitening strips for breakfast?
Also found her attempt at being ‘chill’ very uncomfortable. She’s extremely awkward to watch…
40 in two weeks. Holy Moly!!Not sure what’s worse, the awkward reels or the atrocious journalism
“It was never originally me that was The Style Fairy, it was this character I created”
'Like even from my personal shopping days, women have wardrobes full of clothes but nothing to wear’
‘Like there's a throw-on dress in the collection’
Like, who the fcuk proof read that article before it was published ???
And SHOCKER…
'I'm 40 in two weeks and really noticed over the last couple of years I'm getting a little bit more minimal”…
Whaaaat? She looks well in her 40’s…does this also mean we’ll be subjected to extravagant parties, weekends away and gifts…
Absolutely. Especially since she’s the hardest working most overwhelmed hun in the country. There’ll be LV and YSL and Hermès boxes galore! The Westbury simply will not do for this celebration40 in two weeks. Holy Moly!!
The Maldives so, surely. I'm sure "Cormac" will outdo himself with all the surprises
Such a poorly written article..full of crap of course! In it she says 'I think one of the reasons as well was just that the pieces have longevity, that they're not too loud or bright or strong, they're really more classic, simple, minimal'...it also says 'Naomi has also included more 'trend-led pieces' like the striking silver metallic trousers' ..so which exactly is it?!! A pair of silver trousers do not belong in a capsule wardrobe. They're basically fast fashion clothes, I've actually seen better in Penny's today.Not sure what’s worse, the awkward reels or the atrocious journalism
“It was never originally me that was The Style Fairy, it was this character I created”
'Like even from my personal shopping days, women have wardrobes full of clothes but nothing to wear’
‘Like there's a throw-on dress in the collection’
Like, who the fcuk proof read that article before it was published ???
And SHOCKER…
'I'm 40 in two weeks and really noticed over the last couple of years I'm getting a little bit more minimal”…
Whaaaat? She looks well in her 40’s…does this also mean we’ll be subjected to extravagant parties, weekends away and gifts…
It’s all bullshit. It’s cheap, fast fashion. She’ll be trotting out the same auld shite next year and the year after.Such a poorly written article..full of crap of course! In it she says 'I think one of the reasons as well was just that the pieces have longevity, that they're not too loud or bright or strong, they're really more classic, simple, minimal'...it also says 'Naomi has also included more 'trend-led pieces' like the striking silver metallic trousers' ..so which exactly is it?!! A pair of silver trousers do not belong in a capsule wardrobe. They're basically fast fashion clothes, I've actually seen better in Penny's today.
What…so this isn’t a new range of clothing for AW23? That‘s VERY misleading of Naomi. Does she think her followers are complete foolsI'm just after having a look at the 'collection ' on the Very website and noticed there was a lot of reviews already about some of her clothes..when I clicked into them, several were from months ago on the Very UK site(including ones from 7 months ago) ..so how can these be a new collection that she 'helped' design if they were for sale back earlier in the year?? And some of them got poor ratings...Something fishy going on here
Maybe Very collaborated with her to try and shift stock that isn't selling on their UK siteWhat…so this isn’t a new range of clothing for AW23? That‘s VERY misleading of Naomi. Does she think her followers are complete fools
She definitely giving the impression she was involved in the design and working on this since last January. From what I can see, she did a photo shoot. That’s it. What’s so overwhelming a hard work about that. This campaign by Naomi has been very misleadingWell well well, shady as ya like. The way she goes on you swear she designed the whole “collection” from concept to production. It was all just so overwhelming for the poor cratur. She basically had to choose something out of a wardrobe as basic as ya like in the hopes Very could shift unwanted stock. Jesus but the huns will put their names to anything if the price is right
Well according to the reviews that leather biker jacket has been doing the rounds since 3 years agoShe definitely giving the impression she was involved in the design and working on this since last January. From what I can see, she did a photo shoot. That’s it. What’s so overwhelming a hard work about that. This campaign by Naomi has been very misleading
If Naomi had an ounce of decency she would have said no to participating in a campaign that is trying to deceive the public. What specifically has Naomi been working on since January. She said she had an idea and she went to Very with it and she was very involved. Involved in what precisely? The line if clothes already existed. This is old stock. AW20 by the looks of it.God I really wish Bloggers unveiled was still around, that is so deceptive, totally taking her followers for fools.
She’s bullin at the commentary on here and the fact she has been caught out on a massive lie. Naomi the liarThe last photo she posted her smile looks so forced and false.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?