I think that's a little unfair. I didn't name my 5th son for nearly 6 weeks because I just couldn't find a name that suited him.. Didn't mean that I didn't love him.It really is if she was overjoyed at having a little boy at any point she wouldve named him already out of love for the poor little mite
Exactly. That’s as ridiculous as saying the parents who name their name during pregnancy must love their baby moreI think that's a little unfair. I didn't name my 5th son for nearly 6 weeks because I just couldn't find a name that suited him.. Didn't mean that I didn't love him.
Let's not forget she's knackered too! Give the poor love a breakShe seems very happy to me , she’s always kissing him and showing affection.
yes she's saying that...and? she's merely mentioning it for her followers who are interested...she's not moaning and wailing fgs!So shes saying hes "irritable" today , we all get irritated from time to time hes a new baby for goodness sake , not like she hasnt had children before and should be aware of this already?
Just saw that too. I definitely prefer Myles to LyleHe has a name
Me too she didn’t seem that bothered about naming him just let the rest of the familyI think that was her being blasé so that she didn’t look like the one making all the decisions. She got her choice anyway.Me too she didn’t seem that bothered about naming him just let the rest of the family do it ?
She used to say that Graham wanted a baby more than her or that he was broody. I think she seemed done at 2.I wonder if the rest of the family actually wanted the new baby or was it just her
Yes she said that but Graham didn’t get the name he loved so Claire had the final sayMe too she didn’t seem that bothered about naming him just let the rest of the family do it ?
I’ve always thought the opposite to be honest, I feel that this baby was a push by Claire. Graham seems so laid back he’s horizontal so I get the impression he just does whatever for an easy life.I wonder if the rest of the family actually wanted the new baby or was it just her
I don’t think she uses the kids as content as much as your average instamum though.Families are not as 'Instagramable'when kids get older so she probably had that in mind.
I’d have to disagree with you there. All but one of her 12 most recent Instagram posts is a photo with at least one of her children featured. They are in her vlogs, she even did a potty training video back in the day with violet sat on the toilet knickers round her ankles as the thumbnail. I would say she’s no different than your average insta mum.I don’t think she uses the kids as content as much as your average instamum though.
Oh I don’t like that at all, that’s totally inappropriate to have out thereI’d have to disagree with you there. All but one of her 12 most recent Instagram posts is a photo with at least one of her children featured. They are in her vlogs, she even did a potty training video back in the day with violet sat on the toilet knickers round her ankles as the thumbnail. I would say she’s no different than your average insta mum.
Yes that’s true, the older ones didn’t feature as much but I think that is probably more because they aren’t physically around very much. With how much she’s shared of Myles I don’t think it’s an attempt to keep them offline and more a result of them being older and in school.Oh I don’t like that at all, that’s totally inappropriate to have out thereI find her videos much less focused on the children (before Myles arrival I suppose) than average. Most likely as a result of them being at school. But then I suppose that depends who else I’m watching to compare her to, so kind of a subjective assessment.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?