At bare minimum, one of them could have edited whatever they had that was supposed to go up last Saturday or Sunday, I think it was? I'm sure it's not blockbuster footage, but it would be something to help the algorithm and get some fresh views.I don’t know about anyone else, but I look back now, and having an infant was relatively easy compared to having toddlers. Maybe I just had quiet babies? It only gets harder as they get older. With the nanny, she should have Tim out filming now imo. Banking up some footage so she can leisurely edit. I also think they didn’t hire an editor because she edits out more than she lets on. Maybe Tim let’s some jerky comments slip, and she’s afraid an editor would let them get through. She’s so concerned with appearances, she would never let an editor craft their image.
Also, I'm not really keen on giving them ideas and hate that they monetize their kid, but there's no reason why Tim can't go off for two hours with the Buddy and film them doing something fun together now. Like the Crayola place that has millions of views. Or the Lego store. Or the Rainforest Cafe and get him that $11 sipper. They would be such as easy videos and the stans would make a giant fuss. I'm not into them exploiting J$, but they do anyway.
But I still think there is absolutely no reason why some of those 50 minute videos they have of places couldn't have been 35 minutes with 15 minutes saved for bonus material to put out now. Something like--look, we went to this beach while we were in Hawaii, enjoy it while we take our time off. Or--we went to the Princess meeting on the Wish, back in November...here's that footage. People would watch it, even if it was recording months ago. They make everything so much harder than it needs to be, simply because they are lazy.