The DM advertised for the sender of the cone card to contact them on one of their articles.More worrying to me is that she had to reach out to them for that story to exist, as the DM aren't exactly skilled investigative reporters (unless legalities are thrown out the window). I can't imagine seeking out a name-drop in the Daily Mail.
I'm delighted to hear that she got a reply. That will mean lot to her and it means the card was acknowledged and appreciated.My 6 year old sent Charles a happy coronation card and she was so excited when she got a reply. She took the reply into school to show everyone her (pre printed) letter from the king. I wouldn't have written, but she made a cute card, and it brought her a lot of joy.
Honestly she was so happy. She couldn't believe the king and queen wrote to her. She doesn't understand pre printed cards etc...... so in her eyes he took time out to reply and still talks about it even now. She asked to get the card framed which we have done.I'm delighted to hear that she got a reply. That will mean lot to her and it means the card was acknowledged and appreciated.
I heard a rumour that most Dail Mail articles are written by AI (Chatbot) these days! It would make sense given all the grammar and spelling mistakesI just searched for it and obviously the Daily Mail have an exclusive with the sender
I sent King Charles the viral card - he needed a laugh after diagnosis
EXCLUSIVE: Lisa Moffat, 53, was dumbstruck by videos and photographs of the King chuckling at the £9.99 'giant' get well Moonpig, depicting a sorry-looking dog in a cone.www.dailymail.co.uk
Honestly sometimes I can’t work out if I feel sorry for Daily Mail reporters or not, with the shite they write about
I had You Tube playing in the background the other day and I remember a bloke talking about AI affecting vlogs etc with people talking out of sync.I heard a rumour that most Dail Mail articles are written by AI (Chatbot) these days! It would make sense given all the grammar and spelling mistakes
I’ve never heard of that one but it might have been.I had You Tube playing in the background the other day and I remember a bloke talking about AI affecting vlogs etc with people talking out of sync.
Yesterday I watched someone talking about the political situation and the voice was completely out of sync with the mouth movement
I'm wondering now if this is what he's on about. Wish I'd paid attention now to what he was saying.
Their “journalists” are appalling.I heard a rumour that most Dail Mail articles are written by AI (Chatbot) these days! It would make sense given all the grammar and spelling mistakes
Theres an article in the DM about how her theoretical return to duties should be taken carefully.Any news about Katherine?
This is so typical. A lot of their articles really do read like botsTheir “journalists” are appalling.
On the Christmas card story it said “Mrs Moffat, who is married to her husband Alex…”
Erm surely it should just read “Mrs Moffat, who is married to Alex…” Isn't the word husband unnecessary?
I thought they would post another little update where she thanks people for all the cards and well wishes? Obviously not on a clip like Charles but a post on their social media.Theres an article in the DM about how her theoretical return to duties should be taken carefully.
I sense a desperation to reach a word count as well.This is so typical. A lot of their articles really do read like bots
Yes definitely. Sometimes they even repeat whole paragraphs in the same article.I sense a desperation to reach a word count as well.
Bit like my college assignments!Yes definitely. Sometimes they even repeat whole paragraphs in the same article.
Can relate!Bit like my college assignments!
That's the first time I have read that Catherine's treatment was meant to be be less invasive than it has been, and that they 'found' something else.Are elements of that perhaps accurate? Something unexpected was found when operating on Kate, so they had to admit to a hospital stay but said it was starting for surgery no 1 when perhaps it was recovering from no.1 and going in for surgery no.2?
No idea, just pondering.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?