It would put the monarchy's future once the generation who as whole like Harry and Meghan get into power in 20-35 years time at risk.She won’t strip them because it will look really petty and bad on them and raise questions about Andrew.
Not really, look at every one else in the picture, smiling away at the bride. Then there's herIt’s an unfortunate photo. I’m sure you could find photos of every member of the Royal family looking like Billy no mates at one point or another.
That is really not good for the RF.
Maybe they will need more protection for a while,till things are sorted out Much as I am furious with them for dragging this out with Oprah at the time that the DoE is in hospital,with a more serious problem than was first admitted to,I would not wish any physical harm to any of them.I completely agree but they are setting themselves up for that especially living in a country where those things happen.
I am afraid if anyone is kidnapped it would be the child. Dread thought.I think if anyone ever kidnapped either of them they'd soon be returned. Imagine being subjected to a never ending word salad and moaning on about their terrible lives![]()
I think the journalist even admitted that he made it up.The royals would make sure no pics get out, they'd buy them up and get nda signed. A falling out between two women, one of which nobody had even heard of, is a bit of an odd front page for a major tabloid. Obviously they can't say it outright but the implication was massive.
That and Will dodgy dad dancing with that girl in the ski resort, he's definitely thirsty after married life
I think this is where I think the interview was a bad idea anyway, legal teams will have been over all this with a fine tooth comb so basically nothing really could be said anyway.I think more that they didn't just get on with it and say who it was, rather than make it a guessing game with the finger being pointed at everyone. It's a serious allegation. If you're going to make it and stand by it, then it shouldn't be vague and turned into a witchhunt.
I always thought she would as maybe the public would be more accepting of Charles as she would be here to smooth over the process. People who are fans of the royals seem to love the Queen so might get behind Charles easier that way? Rather than him becoming King when she dies.Well she made an oath to and the fact she is props to her, at 94 still being able to work is pretty awesome and to make it to 94 even better, .
if I make it to 94 I hope to be up and about like her doing things if I can work at 94 I will lol.
Is it realistic no, because she should be enjoying her retirement and what ever time she has left of her life.
Though I do think she should abdicate and get her well earned rest and let Charles deal with his unruly son.
Do you think she she should abdicate ?
rumours, or complaints and staff quitting and going public with these complaints?There were rumours of both of them treating staff pretty badly, losing their tempers, throwing things around etc.
I hope that doesn’t happen, no one should lose their lives over this.
Well, if people "should not stop talking about him" but still do - what are you going to do about it?Honestly, just because he's being silent doesn't mean people should stop talking about him - Piers Morgan has written about 100(??!) articles about Harry and Megan I'm guessing he hasn't written that many about Andrew or any other member of the family.
News outlets and Journalists have a choice on what they can report about - they could release more articles about Andrew with the little information they have if they want but decide not to because the Royal Family holds them to ransom for pictures of the Cambridge kids (which I fully believe)
Maybe the next time people bang on about Harry and Megan trying to control the narrative they should consider that?
Not sure but if Harry's service in Afghan was anything to go by then l expect he was seen as a liability. Is Andrew the one who failed some military exam so had to be given a special post or was that Edward?Is It true that Andrew’s participation in the Falklands War was exaggerated? In that he went, but didn’t see much in the way of active service once there.
I thought Charles or Philip.Not seen any of it, just catching up with comments here.
My thoughts. I reckon it was Charles who asked about the colour of his skin, however I doubt it was meant in the negative way it was taken. Not saying it was right, but I think it's just a generational thing.
*disclaimer, I am not condoning the comment, it's just my thoughts on it, considering Charles age.