not sure the UK would be best pleased if he returned!It would be a laugh if he was booted arse first of of America
not sure the UK would be best pleased if he returned!It would be a laugh if he was booted arse first of of America
It won’t come to anything because the Heritage Foundation will need Harry’s written permission to access his visa records, and he’s hardly going to do that for a neo-con think tank working in conjunction with a right wing tabloid he’s currently suing. It’s just more noise, as usual.Prince Harry visa filings will show if he lied or got special waiver
The Heritage Foundation is currently battling with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to get a copy of the Duke of Sussex's visa filings under the Freedom of Information Act.www.dailymail.co.uk
I presume this won't come to anything but Spare really is the gift that keeps on giving. It was such an own goal for Harry. I wonder if he regrets it yet.
I don't think anything will happen either because he's never been convicted of anything so he doesn't have a record. But as much as it pains me to agree with a group like the Heritage Foundation they do actually have a point. Either be lied on his form or his royal privilige is working in his favour. Other people have been stopped from entering the US just for admitting they took drugs even though they hadn't been convicted.It won’t come to anything because the Heritage Foundation will need Harry’s written permission to access his visa records, and he’s hardly going to do that for a neo-con think tank working in conjunction with a right wing tabloid he’s currently suing. It’s just more noise, as usual.
It’s royal/wealth/white privilege for sure, but the Heritage Foundation just want attention for their gross policies, which are absolutely not targeted at immigrants like Harry. They would have zero issue with the drug use if Harry were a Republican donor, they just hate that he’s “woke”.I don't think anything will happen either because he's never been convicted of anything so he doesn't have a record. But as much as it pains me to agree with a group like the Heritage Foundation they do actually have a point. Either be lied on his form or his royal privilige is working in his favour. Other people have been stopped from entering the US just for admitting they took drugs even though they hadn't been convicted.
Those Windsor genes are pretty brutal, but I did wonder whether there’s more to it. He looks quite drawn and seems to have lost a bit of weight too.The Duke of Edinburgh is really not looking very well at the moment is he?
Bless him he really doesn't look right. I wonder if it's grief. Losing your mum and dad in quick succession must be hard no matter your age.The Duke of Edinburgh is really not looking very well at the moment is he?
He wasn’t liked during the Falkland war!! “Do you know I am” Andy was being the big I am! Where as Charles was a pleasure to work with while serving!! Believe it or not !!Does anyone know why Edward was chosen to take over DoE? (Award and Dukedom?) Is it solely that Andrew was intended for York as the 2nd Son as the late Queen’s father had been prior to the abdication?
I’m not sure how popular Andrew was over time prior to what we know now but he seemed to be liked around the time of The Falklands War?? and would be interested on opinions as to when the shift began?
There are rumours abound that he is really Not well!!Poor guy now looks decades older than his wife. I showed that pic to my husband who was shocked by how he's aged. His suits are hanging on him and all his old fogey mannerisms don't help.
2nd sons are always (almost always?) Duke of York, as it was seen as the second city of England. Henry VIII was duke of York as the second born son. I wonder if Louis as the second son will be given the title once his father becomes king and Andrew dies, or will they give another title as Andrew has tarnished this one.Does anyone know why Edward was chosen to take over DoE? (Award and Dukedom?) Is it solely that Andrew was intended for York as the 2nd Son as the late Queen’s father had been prior to the abdication?
I’m not sure how popular Andrew was over time prior to what we know now but he seemed to be liked around the time of The Falklands War?? and would be interested on opinions as to when the shift began?
I wonder if that was because the last holder had been Jacobite and was ’King Over The Water‘ as Henry IX (and a cardinal) and they were still twitchy about that? (And both Charles I and James II had been Duke of York before monarch)2nd sons are always (almost always?) Duke of York, as it was seen as the second city of England. Henry VIII was duke of York as the second born son. I wonder if Louis as the second son will be given the title once his father becomes king and Andrew dies, or will they give another title as Andrew has tarnished this one.
Victoria's 2nd son was given the title Duke of Edinburgh instead for some reason!