Sensible, given the target his Afghanistan claim has painted. One of the most sensible decisions of this press tour, as long as it's billed to private and not public funds.Armed security costing up to $8,800 per day
Sticking to his guns! Harry protected by armed bodyguards in Manhattan
Prince Harry was in Manhattan on Monday to film an interview with Stephen Colbert. The interview will be broadcast on Tuesday night, as part of Harry's media tour to promote his memoir.www.dailymail.co.uk
How important he must feel. This very ordinary, and quite dull man.Sensible, given the target his Afghanistan claim has painted. One of the most sensible decisions of this press tour, as long as it's billed to private and not public funds.
Sadly, I get the feeling he's suffered with paranoia that has become a self-fulfilling propecy.How important he must feel. This very ordinary, and quite dull man.
The Sussexsquad heads are exploding.Harry and Meghan love Susan HusseyCouldn't make it up.
Why is he carrying around the case - I thought he'd have to have the gun on him. You'd lose a bit of time taking it out of the case if anything happened.Armed security costing up to $8,800 per day
Sticking to his guns! Harry protected by armed bodyguards in Manhattan
Prince Harry was in Manhattan on Monday to film an interview with Stephen Colbert. The interview will be broadcast on Tuesday night, as part of Harry's media tour to promote his memoir.www.dailymail.co.uk
I didn't realise he'd admitted to taking drugs as recently as that. Drug use seems to have been a consistent feature across his adult life. He seems to differentiate between using them recreationally and using them therapeutically which is what he's doing of course. I think he was very unwise to put that out there. Most people who recount their drug taking days have put them well behind them when they tell their story.What's he hoping to achieve with all the constant admissions of drug taken. To look cool? Admitting to taking drugs two years ago with a young child upstairs is perfect amo should meghan ever want a divorce. Legal or not.
A good lawyer wouldn't need to work hard to spin a case for her.
Assuming he still takes them it could help explain his decline and paranoia. They aren't harmless in people who have mental health issues
Harry acts as if he doesn't care about injustices done to other women, he solely perceives those done to Meghan.But Harold is no better than those he criticises, he used Caroline Flack’s name to profit from, not even considering or caring of the hurt and pain that would cause her mother/father/sister/loved ones. He also contradicted himself somewhat over the Press being racist, as Caroline Flack was not black, or mixed race but was treated as appallingly as most of the women who’ve dated/married within the royal family. And I can’t think of much worse than a topless photo circulating around the world as they did to Kate. The Press and the Paparazzi were vile to Kate and she was so young when it started. If anything it’s misogynistic.
Harold doesn’t practice what he preaches of others, he’s a hypocrite, he has no respect for others privacy not even those deceased. I can’t see him getting away with this much more before the tide turns if only a little, as I think he’s pushed way too many peoples buttons this time and of those who’ve previously had his back and it will serve him right.
Those examples he has given are clarifying stories against themselves. They are not telling tales secretly about other members of the family. Harry's point is that he's throwing shit around now openly, but his family were doing it for years about him, secretly. Wooten the moron has just proved their point. Neither of them should have been throwing shit around about the others.Dan Wootton has now said he was briefed by the Sussexes multiple times.
Wootton is an unappealing hack which is probably why this hasn't been picked up widely, but these are very direct accusations he's making in a paper that Harry is currently suing.
If you exchange the names on his Paul Burrell criticism it's almost word for word what people are saying about him and he just can't see it.That Times article g posted by @Em_gardener is spot on. The end line especially about him wanting to be the centre of attention. Embedded in that article is a link to another article about how much damage has been done to the monarchy - not much was the verdict. It pointed out that Diana’s Panorama interview threw Charles under the bus - he could never do the top job etc, but despite all the bad publicity and the highlighting of his flaws, we are now calling him King Charles.
The diehard fans of Harry and his spouse will still think he is great, has a right to tell his story because he is mentally suffering. But having mental health issues doesn’t mean you have carte Blanche to act like a dick and try to destroy the reputations and lives of others. Anyone I have spoken to is heartily sick of Harry and his whinging. Sure, tell your story once, and then move on. Think he has a nerve calling out Paul Burrell for profiting from Diana’s death. He is doing the same.
Plus the £1.5 million for Sentebale. I mean, he'll make much more from the book, considering bookshops are opening early to deal with the rush, but still. He's giving nearly £2 million to charity.always think with these things why only 300k for these things? Better off not saying an amount.
Yesterday I watched a tvprogram about people that fled Belarus, Iran and Russia because of their respective repressive regimes. How Harry can compare his experience of leaving the UK to those who have to go to safety to not end in jail or being assasinated?The whole timing of his epic time is misplaced. We are all suffering the effects of huge price hikes and we have had sucker punch after sucker punch over the last few years. We are facing a General Strike, food banks are commonplace. And yet this pampered manchild thinks including stuff about sleeping in small bedrooms or growing up in draughty stately homes are appropriate gripes for these times.
Incidentally, one of the Times article says that the racism and royal family issue which has not been revealed is possibly being held back to be revealed in Meghan’s book. Yes, we have that litany of woes to look forward to as well.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?