Chocolatelover123
VIP Member
This made have already been said but has anything been said around Kate’s weight? Some pictures of her she looks scarily thin
I think WIlliam looks like a younger Zac Goldsmith but that opens up another can of worms entirely...Not sure, but Oz is possible, for sure as he took a whole year off and went sailing around the world with his mates and had "fun", leaving behind Liz and the kids. Quite dodgy behaviour for a married father of 2 (or 4 by then? don't remember). There were native women on camera for a docu giggling about the encounter with Phil and his friends...
Yes, I agree, Will is mostly all Diana and Harry mostly all Charles. Esp their faces. Charles and Harry did a tour together, a few days, before Meghan, and the similarity between them was apparent, how anyone could still say after that that Harry isn't Chuck's is beyond me.
Harry didn't just take face-wise after his father, but on that tour their mannerisms were the same, their poses, all body language. It was crazy. I have seen fantastic pics of that tour, Harry came across like Chuck's clone.
They also have both the close-set eyes passed down from Mary to her sons to Liz to Charles, Eddie, Anne and Harry, Zara and Louise.
I thought it was Diana ( his best friend) who warned him about ' dark forces' Queenie is, well, Queenie. If she wanted to get rid of sinister aides that were making her daughters in laws lives hell, she could have. Shes got the hands on the purse strings.wonder if it was the same dark forces/powers at work about which we have no knowledge etc etc that Queenie (allegedly) warned Paul about?
Oh we were going to go back to the Nationsl Space centre in Leicester over the summer pre lockdown. Well do that next year on the way to the mil'sThe books are always better! If you get the chance the R3 memorial in Leicester is a fab place to while away an afternoon.
He might not have even copped on that it was not his!! Also he might have done because he was told to do it!! Using it as a cover! So it wouldn’t draw attention! After all, he wasn’t in the position to call pot kettle black!! There was a rumour going around that he has a daughter!! After all he hasn’t a leg to stand on!! Also he is not the regient!!I don’t see it at all. Different shape everything nose, eyes, head, mouth and I was linking a younger picture of Philip that briefly reminded me of Andrew that’s why I used that picture. That’s why I said “imagine with a skinner head”. I just honestly don’t think Andrew is porchys. But everyone has their own opinion.
Plus Andrew was named after Philips father. Do you really think macho Phil will call a kid that isn’t his after his father. I don’t even think Phil would raise the kid never mind treat him better then he treats Charles.
Thankyou xIt means this person will be removed from their workplace and perform certain duties at a funeral should a death occur.
Yeah, I saw that post as well.I think PP must have been unwell at home for some time . Not sure if it was this thread that someone posted that they had heard rumours from a reliable source to expect a death in the RF in the near future.
It’s been all over the media.Can you tell me what she has done?
Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant Andrew's possible daddy being the retaliation by HM against Phil. The staff apparently called him "the love child". Of course, it was spun as the great reconciliation and rebirth of their marriage but maybe not...The trip was before Andrew was born IIRC. If anything, if Sndrew isnt Phil's, it would have been HM retaliatingvagsinst his almost constant infidelity throughout their marriage. There were rumours of problems in the marriage then Andrew was born.
It is also a movie with Julia Roberts.There is a book called 'wonder' about a boy with a facial disfugurement. Maybe she liked it from that, and it resonated with her maybe because of her scoliosis? Does the Queen need to approve names of children so far down the line? I thought Archie was the lowest down she would have to approve? What's his full name? I have a Daily Mail blocker on my computer!
I was referring to Princess Alexandra who was married to the late Angus Ogilvy. She was born in 1936 and is still alive. The lady you referred to was born in 1921 and is now deceased.That’s Princess Alexandra of Yugoslavia, not HRH Princess Alexandra Wikipedia entry.
I agree, I don't think the poppies represent anyone, really. I think that article years ago was conjencture/click-bait.I am not sure. The Queen has been spotted with less poppies in recent years, so I am not sure if they are really representing specific people. Kate has been wearing one, two or three poppies over the years. It's mostly royal ladies that wear more than one poppy and it does look fantastic when they are all decked out in glorious mourning coats. But I don't buy that they stand for specific people. Otherwise we would always see the same number.
Fashion wise, I do love Kate's outfit much more than the last two years. Those uniform inspired coats look very sharp and edgy. She can pull them off but she looks hard. You would expect her to comandeer her army into battle every moment. They are really really cool, but I think the ones from 2018 and 2019 were hardly appropriate. They looked like wanna be uniform and Kate was never in active service and her support for the air cadetts were she is an honorary I don't know what is basically non existent. She is just not a military person. And i think that is fine. They and she should stop pushing it. I am so torn. They make great photos bt it looks as if she is trying to substitute that she hasn't got a uniform of her own and goes to far in creating one.
Mary's daughter catherine Carey had quite a few didn't she so there is some Boleyn blood knocking about. Isn't Kate Middleton a descendent... Sure I read that somewhere!Anne Boleyn only had one child, Elizabeth i who died without issue so there are no descendants of Anne Boleyn