It's very telling that still sue and noel choose not to say anything whilst all the others have.
I think she's young to be having a baby. A lot of people her age are travelling, still in University or just starting out on a brand new career journey. It's sad she's throwing away so many potential opportunities to follow in her mother and sisters footsteps.21 or 22yrs I think.
---
Awww no1 went over to Katie! The Radfords are so odd lol.
---
---
She is not that young.
---
Lots of pics with his family too around the balloon arch but non with any Radfords on Connor's fb.
Yes really sweet reaction, they had put online that they did want a boy.even with yet another Radfraud girl following in the footsteps of her older sisters and having kids at a fairly young age, it was nice to see Katie and her bf's reaction to the gender reveal in contrast to the way Sue ignores the boys in the family. they both seemed so happy to be having a boy, their excitement and emotion was genuine and hopefully they will break the cycle in the way boys are overlooked and the girls always favoured - which, sadly, Millie has continued with Chester.
definitely weird when Connor's family/friends ran over to congratulate him while Katie stood awakardly on the sidelines, alone - despite her family members being present at the gender reveal. pregnancy and new babies is such a non-event for the Radfords - like the kids growing up with so many birthdays in the house, cake etc wasn't something to look forward, as it is for kids usually, as they must be eating it every few weeks with all their sibling's birthdays, plus the Disney trips every month etc, it's all so normalised there is no excitement, which is kinda sad when it's Katie's first child, and her mother's reaction is incredibly blasé - partly probably because she's jealous that her daughters are now having babies when she can't, but especially now knowing Katie is having a boy, she won't be interested at all, other than when she can include him in her "and counting" grandchildren total. boys in the family are simply numbers to Sue, whereas girls are favoured because they have a womb, thus there is potential to pressure them into getting pregnant as young as possible.
Those kids have missed out on so much that other children take for granted just because there are so bloody many of them. A big family does not equal a close family, in fact it's even less likely. Those kids have missed out on so much and all they have to show for it is a few Disney holidays.I think given how many experiences they’ve missed out on as people it’s a bit sad. All they’ve ever known is children. Scratty is probably jealous that Katie is pregnant and couldn’t bear to congratulate her in that reveal and she probably got her witchy finger out to stop any other Radfords rushing over.
Radfords don't understand the concept of waiting to have a baby.Chloe will probably wait until after Katie's baby then have a second. Millie will have her wedding then a fourth to stay relevant.
I agree I don't think she will wait!Radfords don't understand the concept of waiting to have a baby.
She always stands like that for photos. She thinks she’s beautiful. Dream on !!!!!What’s with Sophie, “ pubic ( intentional, not mis spelt) figure’s “ left leg? Is she going to do the okey kokey ?
It’s her ‘page 3 model’ poseShe always stands like that for photos. She thinks she’s beautiful. Dream on !!!!!
Or only fansIt’s her ‘page 3 model’ pose
People are so stupid when they say they ‘deserve all these holidays’ because they work so hard’!!!But it’s obvious they also can’t afford these trips without massive sponsorship. We all know there’s no way a little pie shop selling mediocre-looking and mediocre-sounding pies (let’s face it, there’s nothing revolutionary about a chicken pie) for just under 4 pounds a time, with just one factory staffed by no more than 6 people can turn over enough to pay for a 60,000-pounds long-haul trip, on top of all their other expenses such as mortgage, food, etc. Someone did the math recently on one of their trips and priced out the same trip that they took (same airline, same accommodation, same duration, same number of people) and it came to 60k. Sounds about right.
I don’t begrudge anyone posting anything about their lifestyle just because someone else can’t afford it. There is always someone worse off than you. Even posting a picture of a sandwich is more than someone else has. But I do wish they would stop the whole “we work so hard” and “we don’t claim benefits” thing. 22 pregnancies and deliveries under the care of the NHS is a benefit. State education for 21 children for 11 years or more is a benefit. Healthcare for 23 people with no out-of-pocket expenses is a benefit. There’s no way that little pie shop pays enough tax to cover all that they have taken. They don’t work hard. They grift hard.
I laughed when I saw in their recent trip to Florida that she said she wished she lived here. I live in Florida, not far from Disney World. I challenge her to survive here and have to pay for medical insurance for 23 people from the sale of a few chicken pies. Then she might understand what a “benefit” is.
Agree. The work ethic in that family seems very poor. Fully grown adult male children all lazing in their beds playing on computers. Nowull at work a few hours a day if he's not on holiday or filming fabricated shite for channel 5, Sue doing bugger all, the kids lazing around at school and ending up with no qualifications. Not one of them has a career, not one. None of them have been to uni. Absolute bunch of no hoper scroungers.People are so stupid when they say they ‘deserve all these holidays’ because they work so hard’!!!
For one, they don’t work hard, in fact they work considerably less hard than a lot of people do, can anyone imagine Sue doing a full shift as a nurse then coming home to cleaning, childcare etc?
And for another, no one ‘deserves’ holidays at that rate, why in the name of sanity would anyone think they did?
The fucking world’s gone mad.
Plus the older kids can get UC if they are not working & living at home as my son needed to go on to it briefly & they didn't ask about his dads income etc .Agree. The work ethic in that family seems very poor. Fully grown adult male children all lazing in their beds playing on computers. Nowull at work a few hours a day if he's not on holiday or filming fabricated shite for channel 5, Sue doing bugger all, the kids lazing around at school and ending up with no qualifications. Not one of them has a career, not one. None of them have been to uni. Absolute bunch of no hoper scroungers.
I go shopping in Primark
Taking ten kids in tow
We need some different content
For our Channel 5 show..
feel free to expand…Miley Cyrus- Flowers
She always stands like that for photos. She thinks she’s beautiful. Dream on !!!!!
Certainly not in this case. I mean half of those siblings don’t know the other half. Does Bonnie have any kind of sibling relationship with Sophie for example? How about Hallie and Josh? Chris and Archie? Daniel and Heidie? No of course not. It’s very sad.A big family does not equal a close family, in fact it's even less likely.
When they did those cringey interviews with the kids, most of them couldn't even name all their brothers and sisters, let alone have any kind of bond with themCertainly not in this case. I mean half of those siblings don’t know the other half. Does Bonnie have any kind of sibling relationship with Sophie for example? How about Hallie and Josh? Chris and Archie? Daniel and Heidie? No of course not. It’s very sad.
Hopefully Katie’s little boy will be close with Chester.
The children can not name all their siblings!!!Certainly not in this case. I mean half of those siblings don’t know the other half. Does Bonnie have any kind of sibling relationship with Sophie for example? How about Hallie and Josh? Chris and Archie? Daniel and Heidie? No of course not. It’s very sad.
Hopefully Katie’s little boy will be close with Chester.
That's so sad!When they did those cringey interviews with the kids, most of them couldn't even name all their brothers and sisters, let alone have any kind of bond with them
what's worse is that it's not even the younger ones who can't name all their siblings - can't remember who it was, but whichever of the older girls who wrote the birthday card to Sue from all the kids (which was odd in itself, as surely all the older kids are capable of buying individual cards for their mum, especially the ones with children of their ownThe children can not name all their siblings!!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?