Bit like the (inghams ) if it's lies SUE them !!!The Sun have listed all the 9 holidays. She is a habitual lying witch.
Bit like the (inghams ) if it's lies SUE them !!!The Sun have listed all the 9 holidays. She is a habitual lying witch.
Yes she said she wouldn't reveal name or sex. But she won't get as much free stuff if they don't announce it.I thought on the last q&a Chloe said that she wasn't revealing the gender. Or have I completely made that up?
Sue would have looked ok without the jacket and with better hair colouring.
Oh for the love of God that was me ffs....I take it all back.... she looks like my boys on their first day in Year 7 when they had their brand new school blazers on...seriously she has absolutely no idea...truly an awful sight....that a Zara blazer? Was on Lorraine programme earlier this week...total lost cause...Chavtastic....Didn't someone mention on here about a blazer suiting her better then jumpers?
yeah they supposedly had a vasectomy in between James and Ellie. James was born 17th October 2003. Ellie was born may 6th 2005 so about 18 months or a bit over gap. In terms of radfords though that is a bit of a gap considering most of them are a year apart. A lot even less than a year.Most of us on here are convinced that's another Radfraud lie. The dates just don't add up (like with most stories/lies in Radfraud land!)
I never believed he did, he’s a liar as well.Watching an old episode had no idea noel had the snip then 3 months later had it reversed wtf
I've heard they don't allow a vasectomy on the NHS to people with a pregnant partner or young baby (under 6 months?), partly for morbid reasons (mortality rates) and to make sure they're sure. I'm sure when it was discussed on here before others backed up this was the case in their experience. The dates seem very suss and Noel was so vague about it when it came up on an old KAC (I may be wrong but I don't think it's been mentioned since either?). It just seems to me like something they thought sounded 'good' at the time. Oh, we did seriously think about controlling the size of our family but we just found we love children so much we simply couldn't bear not to have any moreyeah they supposedly had a vasectomy in between James and Ellie. James was born 17th October 2003. Ellie was born may 6th 2005 so about 18 months or a bit over gap. In terms of radfords though that is a bit of a gap considering most of them are a year apart. A lot even less than a year.
What the duck is she wearing.I really hope they just share it not profit it from it (someone slap me this is the radfords we talking about) they prob already planned wat they spending the money on know it won’t b spent on the kids
U has so no clue wat fashion is n wat clothes go together does sheView attachment 1089018View attachment 1089018
Yes but there’s blazers and blazersDidn't someone mention on here about a blazer suiting her better then jumpers?
I hate all this American crap too.She clearly already knows!
Chloe looks like she's away clubbing not finding out the gender of her baby! Really can't buy class can you.
Totally over the top for a gender reveal, I hate the fact we've now adopted all these American traditions, so over the top.
I never had a baby shower and wouldn't ever attend one either. My gender reveal was looking at the screen and seeing there was no penis
Hopefully not qnything to benefit sue and Noel , and she’s just sharing because it’s what a lot of mums now do. I keep thinking why shouldnt she do what her mates are doing , just because her parents are twats.You were right. Not sure if they will vlog it or use it for the tv show or just share later.
Millie doesn’t owe them anything, hers not her who started all this. It’s sue and NoelIn my opinion they are either keeping it husb hush till a big payday or she will genuinely keep him off social media BUT either way i think they could very easily just upload a single pic, not of his face etc, just a msg that says all are well, hes here n date n weight. They are biting the hand that feeds them by not releasing anything and folks will lose interest. Personally i couldnt give a shiny shite n i never share or release any info of my daughter, but i am not earning a hefty living from social media or attempt to get freebies left right and centre. Many will say they dont owe viewers anything, but when you make your money from views n sponsers then they really do owe them at least an acknowledgement mum n baby are good n healthy. X
It seems very strange that she finally decided to announce it on her due date, only to go off radar again now he's here (as, let's face it, it's pretty obvious he must be here by now).In my opinion they are either keeping it husb hush till a big payday or she will genuinely keep him off social media BUT either way i think they could very easily just upload a single pic, not of his face etc, just a msg that says all are well, hes here n date n weight. They are biting the hand that feeds them by not releasing anything and folks will lose interest. Personally i couldnt give a shiny shite n i never share or release any info of my daughter, but i am not earning a hefty living from social media or attempt to get freebies left right and centre. Many will say they dont owe viewers anything, but when you make your money from views n sponsers then they really do owe them at least an acknowledgement mum n baby are good n healthy. X
Either that or she has kidney problems or B&Q want their can of Creosote back...I didn't know they were related to oompa loompas.
is that Katie? She’s a pretty girl and doesn’t seem quite as tarty as Millie, Chloe et al... YET!I didn't know they were related to oompa loompas.
The coat looks like she robbed Worzel Gummage!I really hope they just share it not profit it from it (someone slap me this is the radfords we talking about) they prob already planned wat they spending the money on know it won’t b spent on the kids
U has so no clue wat fashion is n wat clothes go together does sheView attachment 1089018View attachment 1089018