They live in Hemel Hempstead in Hertfordshire so nowhere near Morecambe
They live in Hemel Hempstead in Hertfordshire so nowhere near MorecambeI doubt it they live in the Midlands Nottingham I think
They recently moved to NottinghamThey live in Hemel Hempstead in Hertfordshire so nowhere near Morecambe
its Aimee, she’s always had a slightly different lookDefo no Millie at breakfast on sues instastories although I’m not sure who’s next to Katie doesn’t look like a radford.
Defo no Millie at breakfast on sues instastories although I’m not sure who’s next to Katie doesn’t look like a radford.
A right motley crew
They were gifted them!!Imagine being thick enough to buy Merlin passes and then only ever go to one attraction?!
There's thick and then there's Radford thick!
I didn’t know this! Thank youThey recently moved to Nottingham
Not much you can do a theme park if you’re pregnantThink Sue is trying to make it obvious that Millie isnt there. there should be the usual group pic coming soon so we’ll see
Yes, Peppa Pig. Great quality literature as usual!Only present that was clearly shown for Bonnie’s birthday was a book. Didn’t we mention how the kids don’t ever get books as gifts? Hi Sue
Those kids see their parents do fuck all except filming everything.I agree, there's no way any regular reading goes on in that house. Most parents of just one young child have more books in their house than the Radfords. The children's teachers must be fighting a losing battle sending home reading books, and trying to help the children learn, as Sue and Noel just don't give a damn about reading or education.
There's definitely no excuse. If they wanted books then i'm sure they could easily afford them, recieve them as gifts, join a library, buy from charity shops or even check Fb marketplace / freecycle as people are always clearning out old books. It's sad that none of the children have ever been encouraged to develop a love of books and stories. I can't imagine a childhood where I wasn't able to devour new books, lose myself in fascinating new worlds and join characters on their amazing adventures. Heck the poor Radford children need that sort of escapism more than most, to escape their depressing reality.No excuse not to have books .Most kids books are 2 for £7 in Asda or if you don’t want to spend that then the library . We have loads of book for primary age, but once they get older they seem to prefer a kindle.
Even Poundland do cheap books and the works always have offers on. No excuse just pure laziness on Sue and Noel's partNo excuse not to have books .Most kids books are 2 for £7 in Asda or if you don’t want to spend that then the library . We have loads of book for primary age, but once they get older they seem to prefer a kindle.
It builds up over time too when you have a lot of kids, you end up with lots of books.No excuse not to have books .Most kids books are 2 for £7 in Asda or if you don’t want to spend that then the library . We have loads of book for primary age, but once they get older they seem to prefer a kindle.
3 for £5 at The Works, even 5 for £5 at certain times of the year. As you say, there's no excuse whatsoever as they can easily afford books. Even if they couldn't there's always the library, which should all be open again now. They simply can't be bothered to read to them though.No excuse not to have books .Most kids books are 2 for £7 in Asda or if you don’t want to spend that then the library . We have loads of book for primary age, but once they get older they seem to prefer a kindle.
I’m the same age as sue, and it may have been a long time ago, but at 13, we would not be having sex with a man of 18. Back then, we knew the age of consent, as much as young people know it nowIt’s massively pathetic that a woman of Sue’s age would ‘unfollow’ and ‘re-follow’ her own kids in social media every time they have an argument. Even if temporarily not on speaking terms, there’s no need to actually look or comment on each other’s social media, ‘following’ doesn’t equate to interaction.
Incredibly childish behaviour from Sue, and the fact that she is doing something so visible outside of the family is signalling publicly when there are arguments…but they then don’t acknowledge any problems in their videos or commentary. Either keep it private or be open about these problems. Instead an argument from a family discussion about something that could actually be important (such as whether it is safe and reasonable to try to have more babies, or something like whether it is better for Millie’s personal life and reputation to step back from being on the channel (if she is indeed pregnant again and without a long term partner or employment), or maybe whether Daniel did actually abuse his girlfriend, and how his parents are going to deal with that behaviour to ensure he doesn’t get into that situation again, considering he still lives under their roof they surely must take some responsibility for guiding him through this and making sure he gets a better understanding of what is appropriate in relationships and how to control his temper, when to walk away etc).
But despite all the potentially serious and important discussions that may be needed to make progress and resolutions…the girls in particular will all be texting each other and bitching about who has unfollowed who. Absolute nonsense. Sue should be ashamed of acting like a moody teenager, and learn some parenting skills for how to deal with problems with her children (even if they happen to be over 18) in a more appropriate manner.
There’s clearly something not right with Noel, with him bedding Sue underage, but looking past that historic issue, I think he is a much more sensible person and parent than Sue. In the early tv series and to an extent now, he was up very early and at work every morning, then back home to help with school runs, cooking the evening meals, budgeting for all of them. Even with the vlogging, it’s Noel who needs to do the difficult bit…the editing, which to begin with would have been a completely new skill set to learn. I think Noel is calm natured enough to go to work with one of the kids who Sue is in the middle of a massive row with and keep his relationship with them separate as much as is possible.
I can see a real nasty streak in Sue, it’s in her whole demeanour, a hardness, the way she doesn’t seem to hug her young kids, or they don’t climb on her or put an around her know, when they spend most of their time with her while Noel is at work is weird. Sue likes holding a baby and being pregnant, once she gets bored she has the siblings look after each other to the extent that they don’t really need her for emotional support any more. She doesn’t take on board genuine (not trolling) criticism and reply with dignity, she fights back with insults and ganging up using her kids and followers to help her attack.
I can also see another angle on the underage sex issue. It leaves Noel permanently at risk of public and detailed accusations from Sue over his conduct at age 18, should he decide to split up with her. She holds the upper hand at all times. I’m not doubting that his behaviour was inappropriate and illegal, but without knowing the 2 families at the time, and how they interacted, I reserve judgement as Sue has not stating any suffering and gives the impression of being happy with her past. Did their parents for example know about the relationship, was it made clear to Noel at the time how inappropriate it was, how much effort did either parents make to stop them being in contact? If their parents knew and didn’t react much to the age gap issue or try to stop them, at the time Noel may not have understood how wrong it was. The was before the internet and before teenagers could easily check on legal issues such as when it goes form underage sex to statutory rape, where teenagers mostly just had their parents and friends for reference. It wouldn’t surprise me at all if the first pregnancy was intentional on Sue’s part, the desperation for babies could have started that young. Noel was the legal adult and should have been the one to make the decision not to have sex based on the age gap, but as for who was applying m the pressure to do so…it would not surprise me at all if Sue was already obsessed with pregnancy babies at that time and was seeing Noel as her route to making it happen. However it started, if they were to split up, and Sue were to tell tales, whether the full truth, held truths or exaggeration, or outright lies….because she was a child at the time,the public perception would automatically to be to believe what she says and vilify Noel. She could go from dedicated wife to sexual abuse claimant overnight and the media and public would not question it because the age gap would be taken as the evidence that ‘proves’ all associated claims.
I read somewhere before, possibly here, that Sue was posting a few years ago that Noel would be out a lot at the pub and it sounded like he might be cheating or wanting to leave her. I’m wondering if he wanted to, but couldn’t, because of how she reacts when feeling spiteful and knows how much she could damage him. If she wanted she could even go to the police about the statutory rape, and Noel would probably have the fear of prison even if no charges were brought, the fear of it would be enough to keep him in line. Sue holds all the power, and she knows it.
They probably said something along the lines of…In our day it was ok…which is so wrongWhat I’ve always wondered is when the kids get to that age they know about sex and consent have any of them thought of noel and sue’s age and looked at age of Chris and put 2 & 2 together because that must creep them out surely
I imagine the older lads can't just sit and watch TV in a room full of sleeping kids so have to do somethingDo you get games consoles in the rooms at Alton Towers? or have the sad sacks taken one with them?!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?