Have you guys seen anything about this?
Also super sorry for my
crappy screen shots lol I don't have X to go right to the main source for you guys haha
I very much remember once Bryan got to Idaho, AT scheduled a preliminary hearing and then all of a sudden, prosecutors rushed into the grand jury. Lots of online chatter about why they did this and many said it was related to BF.
Anyways it's all online gossip with no source so take with a grain of salt. Just found it interesting.
Yes I've heard about this. I'm still waiting for proof of this.
Your attachments are fine. No worries
I heard that BF got a ticket in Pullman WA for tailgating back in Oct 2022 but either didn't pay it or didn't show up for the court date and there was a warrant put out for her arrest. , but I haven't seen any proof of this.
In light of the hearings from late last year and this year. I think the reason that the prosecution did the grand jury hearing in May 2023 when they agreed to the preliminary hearing in June 2023 is because they didn't have the evidence need do to the preliminarily hearing because state needs to be able to turn them over to the defense before the preliminary hearing starts. I think that the state was trying to buy time to try find the evidence that they need in order to get a conviction. I'm referring to things like the video of the white car that drove around 1122 King Rd that Anne said is open court recently that she only has bits and pieces of it without audio. Remember the PCA said that there was a thud, a dog barking and other sounds heard on that video clip. Anne said that the video starts way earlier than the first clip that the state gave her to. She also said that the state was trying to line up the audio with the video during the hearing in either Jan 2024 or Feb 2024. SMH. That doesn't make any sense. I wonder what happened to the video, why is the audio and the video out of sync, it makes no sense, but I do have a theory. I think that the video that they have of the white car driving around the house the morning of the crime isn't very clear, LE can't see who is behind the wheel of the car, LE can't see the license plate on the back of the car clearly either. Also the year of the car changed, mmm I wonder who did that. I think that Payne did that himself and not the fbi car expert, that's just imo. Also remember that in June 2023 there was a motion to compel hearing and the defense asked for the final report of the FBI CAST report and the judge scheduled a deadline of July 2023 and the prosecution only turned over a "draft" of the FBI CAST by the deadline, yes a "draft". We only know this because Anne mentioned that it was a " draft" in a court document that she filed in Aug 2023 and in some of the hearings in 2024, Anne has stated that she only has a draft of the FBI CAST report, too. So in the latest hearing the prosecution did confirm that they don't have the final FBI CAST report. Mmmm. that's funny why is that. Mmmm I wonder what could be the problem. Is the FBI backing away from this case or is it due to some other reason?! Also hearsay is allowed in a grand jury but not in trial. I think that the state presented some hearsay. For the grand jury I think that the prosecution probably just read the PCA and got an indictment. I think that the state didn't want the preliminary hearing because of the parking situation e.g the limited parking at the court house. Another reason I think that the prosecution did the grand jury it with all of the attention on this case, when the preliminary hearing was announced people rented hotel rooms and Air b n bs months ahead of the preliminary hearing. Due to being a small town there isn't enough lodging available to meet the demand for the preliminary hearing and same goes for places to eat, too. There isn't enough restaurants available and staff to meet the high demand. I also think that the state didn't want the public to see what the state has in terms of evidence and they didn't want people to see BF and DM testimony about what happened that morning at 1112 King rd house. Then there is that situation of the touch dna that the state never calls it touch dna but probably dna and then people think oh LE got them. Touch dna is complex situation and that "The STR profile is at least 5.37 octillion times more likely to be seen if (the) Defendant is the source than if an unrelated individual randomly selected from the general population is the source,” prosecutors said in the filing. An octillion is a number equal to a 1 followed by 27 zeros.", this isn't a real number from what I understand, even Anne mentioned in a court document she wonder how they came up with that number. Touch dna is transferable and can end up in places that you have never been. Also that IGG tree isn't foolproof even one YouTube said that she used one of those DNA websites looking for relatives and she was matched with someone that she figured out that she wasn't related too after talking to her family about it. The touch dna for BK is a partial print when SNP was made it probably lead to several people not just one person and also you can't compare a SNP and a STR to see if those match. LE could only see if BK's dna matches the STR that they have. But I heard that the dna sample that LE found on the sheath isn't that big and I heard that they used up the whole sample and that the defense can't even do their whole testing on it. SMH.
