There was that thing about the Stingray device being used.
I wonder if they lost the phone?
I wonder if they lost the phone?
where did you hear that from?There was that thing about the Stingray device being used.
I wonder if they lost the phone?
I heard it from you....where did you hear that from?
I can't wait for the May 30th hearing
and also don't forget the last paragraph from the alibi document filed by the defense the part "was either not preserved or has been withheld"
View attachment 2953855
oh okay yeah I thought that because they wasn't turning over the fbi cast report but after this hearing, I've changed my mind. I need to rewatch this hearing. I'm can't wait for the May 30, 2024 hearing with Sy Ray.I heard it from you....
Are you in the UK?How come he's being allowed to wear suits and seems to be given more "freedom" than most others who are in custody in the US court system? I find that weird.
Andrea a lawyer ( out of Washington state) on YouTube said that the second judicial circuit found that prison outfits were prejudicial.How come he's being allowed to wear suits and seems to be given more "freedom" than most others who are in custody in the US court system? I find that weird.
Why is it weird?How come he's being allowed to wear suits and seems to be given more "freedom" than most others who are in custody in the US court system? I find that weird.
So the hearing was the chance for the police to say "trust me bro."
It was rather odd.
One explanation is that whatever the search parameters were, was outside of the warrant.
Another is that this copper was buggering about on the police computer - and if I were a cynic, was passing on (selling) the information to a journalist.
Or it could be a backdoor way for the FBI to pass information to the court - without the bother of going to the Federal court - in the form of the "found file" fished out from behind the filing cabinet.
But whatever the case, this detective didn't appear exactly the most competent person at using the software.
---
Why is it weird?
That may very well be the case.I need to go back and watch this hearing again. The testimony of the detective from MPD was odd. It's not looking good for the state imo. It really looks like the information that is exculpatory to the defendant wasn't saved imo.
But the hearing was called by the defense for their 4th and 5th motion to compel discovery. This witness was called by the defense and not the state. The defense is trying to show what information they need and what information should have been turned over to them and how that information was handled e.g. when LE got that information back from Search warrants e.g. ATT and Verzion and the collection of the surveillance video of the white Hyundai around Moscow, Idaho and Pullman, WA the night of the murders and around the 1122 King Rd house. Mowery created the map of the cell phone pings for the grand jury and only made a screenshot but he didn't save any of this work. I think that someone said that they got some information from FBI special agent Nick Ballance that is a member of CAST, a cellular analyst survey team that specializes in determining location based on cellphone records. FBI special agent Nick Ballance is the same person that had worked on the Lori Vallow and the Chad Daybell cases. Also Anne asked about the traffic cameras and if the detective was able to save the video and he said that those traffic cameras doesn't store the video but I thought that it would have for like 30 days. IDK. This Mowery guy is the top person for the
FYI - back on APRIL 3, 2024 this is about the same detective that testified in this last hearing.
The U.S. Secret Service (USSS) formally recognized Moscow Police Department’s Detective Lawrence Mowery for achievement in the field of digital forensics and cyber-crime investigation.
Detective Mowery was honored in person at Monday’s City Council meeting by USSS Spokane Office’s Resident Agent in Charge, Greg Ligouri, and Network Intrusion Forensic Analyst Neil J. Uhrig.
Detective Mowery attended the National Computer Forensics Institute (NCFI) training program in 2022. In 2023, Detective Mowery conducted more digital forensic examinations than any other NCFI graduate in northern Idaho, eastern Washington, and western Montana.
maybe,That may very well be the case.
But he seemed very shaky on this particular software.
veteran with PTSDWho is Brent Kopack?
Brent Kopacka served in the U.S. Army between 2005 and 2009 in the 2nd Battalion, 508TH Parachute Infantry Regiment, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division. He was awarded the Purple Heart for his service in Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, where he sustained a traumatic brain injury during combat. Kopacka’s family said in his obituarythat over the last 16 years, he “fought a courageous [ongoing] battle against PTSD, but in the end he couldn’t break free.”Who is Brent Kopack?
I saw some clips on line, where the defence refers to Brent Kohberger, and the judge says Brian Kopack.Brent Kopacka served in the U.S. Army between 2005 and 2009 in the 2nd Battalion, 508TH Parachute Infantry Regiment, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division. He was awarded the Purple Heart for his service in Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, where he sustained a traumatic brain injury during combat. Kopacka’s family said in his obituarythat over the last 16 years, he “fought a courageous [ongoing] battle against PTSD, but in the end he couldn’t break free.”
I heard that Officer Payne was in the 82nd Airborne Division but in different years and I forgot which set of years but it wasn't between 2005 and 2009, that I do know.
View attachment 2962293
^^ Sorry the investigation lasted for 10 months after the SWAT situation happened in Dec 2022. This was the press release. I heard that one of Brent Kopacka's roommates was having an episode and it triggered Brent Kopacka and he then had his own episode which ended in that situation. I think that LTL Media may have the full body cam footage, this channel has parts of the body cam footage of the standoff that another channel doesn't have. I'm guessing that other channel that doesn't have certain parts of the footage is because that creator edited out. imo.
yeah it sounds like that by the defense but I'm not sure and the sound imo wasn't that good so some parts of that last hearing are hard to heardI saw some clips on line, where the defence refers to Brent Kohberger, and the judge says Brian Kopack.
If I recall correctly he didn't first name the individual. He referred to Mr Kopacka before quickly correcting this to Mr Kohberger hence more confusionyeah it sounds like that by the defense but I'm not sure and the sound imo wasn't that good so some parts of that last hearing are hard to heard
I missed the part where the judge Said Brian kopacka , I didn't heard that but the sound was bad in some parts of the hearings.