The Ingham Family #65 I know what you did Chris, you little biatch!

[GowiththeflowMo]

TBH I don’t care how innocent those kids look on camera, I can totally see this happening. I remember reading a comment on their YT vlogs from a girl who was at school with Isabelle saying how horrible she was and how braggy she was. None of that is their fault of course, the parents have made them this way which is very sad indeed

I think all you have to do is look at old videos when they very first started and compare them to now ! The girls have gone from natural likeable kids to cheeky show off brats ! That’s definitely as a result of bad parenting and the adoration of the Ifam going to their heads making them think they are a cut above the rest ! Who can blame them really ? The very idea that other kids have their pictures on their walls and walking about wearing clothing emblazoned with their names on , its enough to send the sweetest child into narcissism especially when the parents NEVER EVER reprimand them all except esme who Sarah likes to pick on every now and then ! Chris & Sarah never apologise or take the blame for anything they do or say and so why would their kids be any different?
I see a very rocky road ahead ! The worst thing that happened was Izzy’s real dad being cut out of the picture as I recall he didn’t like her in videos and so was clearly imo the most sensible influence on her life but too late now , the damage is done !

I will however say that Sarah’s pic doesn’t look photoshopped to me ! Just a good angle and light ! :/ just my opinion ! No need to photoshop , angles are everything !

Today’s vlog was totally and utterly zzzzzzzz
My F FWD button is going to break if I don’t stop hate watching soon !

I’m creating my own Bad karma I know, I know !

 

[Catlover360]

Imagine it was Lorraine all along or Nikki I can’t see the Katrina being that dumb
But the private info that’s the thing unless she told someone it has to be Katrina

From what I saw there wasn’t much said that hasn’t already been made public. Like Jane being accused of trolling Leah etc. It was real inghams who said about the trip that Leah went on first. Most people know Katrinas partners name. She didn’t give anything away that I could see. The unblocking thing yes maybe but would need to see proof of it actually happening. And the screenshots that ‘Katrina’ said she would send them.

 

[lemonelmo]

Wow i went to watch a movie and came back to essays galore!

I thought the real inghams video was going to end with the proof of the facebook account being unblocked. When it didnt i just thought they must have that proof before releasing the convo. Now i am second guessing myself.

Im going out on a whim here and i know i will get the usual suspects shooting me down however...

Could this whole thing have been orchestrated. Im not sure why, i thought you guys could help me with the why. As it makes no sense...

The sayers account could have had a fake conversation with the pony picture account. The pony picture account could have had a fake conversation with the real ingham account. The sayers account could be part of the real inghams and all the conversations are faked between themselves.

Either way the whole thing is a real sh*t storm and confusing to hell!

May i also ask... Why do the real inghams conversation stylw change so much? Is there no one set person always typing? Sometimes it sounds like a 10 year old and sometimes it sound like a mature adult.

The real inghams are all about needing proof proof proof but cannot accept it when we ask for more proof. We cant be expected to blindly believe what they are saying. I was convinced for a while earlier, then i got thinking.

 

[Oohthedrama]

I am starting to get an uneasy feeling about this. I really hope the real inghams are telling the truth

Real Inghams are VERY quite when they’re asked for proof
But say something negative about them on a normal day and they’re straight up to defend themselves

We literally just want proof this stuff is real and confirmed to be from Katrina but so far nothing

May i also ask... Why do the real inghams conversation stylw change so much? Is there no one set person always typing? Sometimes it sounds like a 10 year old and sometimes it sound like a mature adult.

seems to be a mixture of slightly older teenagers/young adults and maybe an adult or two
as I’ve said before they've faked a victim in the past and have had some questionable members so I can’t accept what they say without receipts

I know they look down on us at times but they might humor us with a reply

 

[BattyBits]

Wow i went to watch a movie and came back to essays galore!

I thought the real inghams video was going to end with the proof of the facebook account being unblocked. When it didnt i just thought they must have that proof before releasing the convo. Now i am second guessing myself.

Im going out on a whim here and i know i will get the usual suspects shooting me down however...

Could this whole thing have been orchestrated. Im not sure why, i thought you guys could help me with the why. As it makes no sense...

The sayers account could have had a fake conversation with the pony picture account. The pony picture account could have had a fake conversation with the real ingham account. The sayers account could be part of the real inghams and all the conversations are faked between themselves.

Either way the whole thing is a real sh*t storm and confusing to hell!

May i also ask... Why do the real inghams conversation stylw change so much? Is there no one set person always typing? Sometimes it sounds like a 10 year old and sometimes it sound like a mature adult.

The real inghams are all about needing proof proof proof but cannot accept it when we ask for more proof. We cant be expected to blindly believe what they are saying. I was convinced for a while earlier, then i got thinking.

The Real Inghams always seem to incorrectly use the word ‘was’ in place of the correct alternative eg- ‘we was always protecting the girls’ instead of ‘we were...’ totally irrelevant to anything at all it just always annoys me when I read it

 

[String Man]

Y’all pointing out other things... WHAT THE duck IS THAT TOE

I'm wondering where have her kneecaps gone.

I will however say that Sarah’s pic doesn’t look photoshopped to me ! Just a good angle and light ! :/ just my opinion ! No need to photoshop , angles are everything !

Her waist has definitely been photoshopped, you can see where they tried to slim it but left some of her swimming costume near her arm.

 

[AutumnGhost]

Sarahs latest Instagram post - I’m starting to think this is why she has all that god awful hair hanging - to try and hide how huge she’s gotten.

 

[lemonelmo]

If this all does come out as fake then do they not realise how much this discredits everything that they have released this week

And ever

 

[Catlover360]

Wow i went to watch a movie and came back to essays galore!

I thought the real inghams video was going to end with the proof of the facebook account being unblocked. When it didnt i just thought they must have that proof before releasing the convo. Now i am second guessing myself.

Im going out on a whim here and i know i will get the usual suspects shooting me down however...

Could this whole thing have been orchestrated. Im not sure why, i thought you guys could help me with the why. As it makes no sense...

The sayers account could have had a fake conversation with the pony picture account. The pony picture account could have had a fake conversation with the real ingham account. The sayers account could be part of the real inghams and all the conversations are faked between themselves.

Either way the whole thing is a real sh*t storm and confusing to hell!

May i also ask... Why do the real inghams conversation stylw change so much? Is there no one set person always typing? Sometimes it sounds like a 10 year old and sometimes it sound like a mature adult.

The real inghams are all about needing proof proof proof but cannot accept it when we ask for more proof. We cant be expected to blindly believe what they are saying. I was convinced for a while earlier, then i got thinking.

The thing that really interests me is the profile picture of the troll account. Would Jane or Katrina be stupid enough or brazen enough to link a picture to a troll account that is linked to a Facebook page called Jane inghams horse riding? Has someone tried to create a fake troll account and thought they were linking it to janes real account? To prove Jane has been trolling? Then for some reason changed their mind and made out it’s Katrina? If this is all made up they have really messed things up for themselves. As it will discredit everything they have ever posted or said about this whole thing. Would the real inghams really be that stupid to get involved with this? At the end of the day I’m not here for all this tit. I want Chris to admit what he did and get off YouTube. All this stuff is just distracting from the real issue that is the creepy greasy Chris ingham.

 

[lemonelmo]

The thing that really interests me is the profile picture of the troll account. Would Jane or Katrina be stupid enough or brazen enough to link a picture to a troll account that is linked to a Facebook page called Jane inghams horse riding? Has someone tried to create a fake troll account and thought they were linking it to janes real account? To prove Jane has been trolling? Then for some reason changed their mind and made out it’s Katrina? If this is all made up they have really messed things up for themselves. As it will discredit everything they have ever posted or said about this whole thing. Would the real inghams really be that stupid to get involved with this? At the end of the day I’m not here for all this tit. I want Chris to admit what he did and get off YouTube. All this stuff is just distracting from the real issue that is the creepy greasy Chris ingham.

I saw a post by the sayer woman asking how to reverse search a photo. That post in itself could have been set up to start the believability of this whole this. So anyone that has seen it thinks she was trying to see if the photo came from anywhere else. Does that make sense at all

 

[GowiththeflowMo]

Okay trying to catch up here with the posts and not just my views on vlogs , harder than it sounds as I have the attention span of a goldfish at the best of times however things I’m reading are sparking memories in my mind of past thoughts :

I have long wondered if there where let’s say 2 people or possibly 1 person with multiple personalities or even a group of people who go in and out of ‘ online dramas ‘ and create a FOR and an AGAINST account / accounts to put simply STIR THE tit on both sides of the fence, for nonother reason than they can and for the pleasure they get watching people fight amongst themselves!

I don’t want to mention names because I could be completely wrong and barking up the wrong tree but this thought comes and goes A LOT because at times I’ve noticed that the FORS and the AGAINST have very similar characteristics at times which could just be a big coincidence and by the way I HOPE I AM WRONG ! But imagine if it where true it would explain a lot ( at least in my muddled mind ) which is the main reason I’m out of the loop and just drop my thoughts here from time to time because the inner and the outer circles are confusing at fk ! & all I truly care about are all innocent parties whom to me are THE INGHAM KIDS despite what I’ve said about their behaviour etc they are innocent whilst under 18 AND more so the girls whom Chris was / is ??? Grooming ! Nothing else really matters to me in this story so as I say I hope I’m wrong !

Over and out ! :/

 

[Catlover360]

I saw a post by the sayer woman asking how to reverse search a photo. That post in itself could have been set up to start the believability of this whole this. So anyone that has seen it thinks she was trying to see if the photo came from anywhere else. Does that make sense at all

Yes it does make sense. That troll account has now been removed. If Jane and Katrina and the rest of them have been trolling all this time they would know to never use a picture that could link back to them in any way shape or form. And for the troll page to use a different Jane inghams picture? All very suspicious to me. The supposed Katrina also gave up her identity very quickly with little pressure. I have a big feeling this has all been faked.

 

[lemonelmo]

The thing that really interests me is the profile picture of the troll account. Would Jane or Katrina be stupid enough or brazen enough to link a picture to a troll account that is linked to a Facebook page called Jane inghams horse riding? Has someone tried to create a fake troll account and thought they were linking it to janes real account? To prove Jane has been trolling? Then for some reason changed their mind and made out it’s Katrina? If this is all made up they have really messed things up for themselves. As it will discredit everything they have ever posted or said about this whole thing. Would the real inghams really be that stupid to get involved with this? At the end of the day I’m not here for all this tit. I want Chris to admit what he did and get off YouTube. All this stuff is just distracting from the real issue that is the creepy greasy Chris ingham.

I checked out that jane ingham account, ive never heard any of them mention ponies before. So is it not THE jane ingham them? All so weird. So so weird. I can't keep up

Yes it does make sense. That troll account has now been removed. If Jane and Katrina and the rest of them have been trolling all this time they would know to never use a picture that could link back to them in any way shape or form. And for the troll page to use a different Jane inghams picture? All very suspicious to me. The supposed Katrina also gave up her identity very quickly with little pressure. I have a big feeling this has all been faked.

Her mannerisms(i know that cannot be portrayed using words but i know what i mean lol) changed with a snap of a finger. You are so right. Any way you are all correct this is taking away from the real matter... Creepy chris. How is Lazy getting on with her orange twirl withdrawals? Most people go on holiday and gain ten poubds. I think she will lose ten pounds with no access to those ginger twirls

 

[Picador]

I just can’t keep up

Chris is a nonce.
Jane is a groomer.
Steve is a tattlelife fan.
Sarah doesn’t eat sugar.
The girls are going around saying they’re famous.

All this plus a gangster family from Newcastle are now after them
You just couldn’t make this tit up.

 

[GowiththeflowMo]

I’ll have to

I'm wondering where have her kneecaps gone.

View attachment 53920



Her waist has definitely been photoshopped, you can see where they tried to slim it but left some of her swimming costume near her arm.

View attachment 53921

I’ll have to take your word for it as I’m useless at that kind of thing

 

[Catlover360]

I checked out that jane ingham account, ive never heard any of them mention ponies before. So is it not THE jane ingham them? All so weird. So so weird. I can't keep up


Her mannerisms(i know that cannot be portrayed using words but i know what i mean lol) changed with a snap of a finger. You are so right. Any way you are all correct this is taking away from the real matter... Creepy chris. How is Lazy getting on with her orange twirl withdrawals? Most people go on holiday and gain ten poubds. I think she will lose ten pounds with no access to those ginger twirls

No it’s a totally different Jane ingham. Nothing to do with the evil granny Jane. I think we are being trolled lol. Why don’t they just come right out and say it haha. Hiding all the time. It’s because they have no power here and they hate it.

 

[String Man]

I saw a post by the sayer woman asking how to reverse search a photo. That post in itself could have been set up to start the believability of this whole this. So anyone that has seen it thinks she was trying to see if the photo came from anywhere else. Does that make sense at all

It would be one hell of a set up if that was the case.

I've had a quick search on FB and found a Stephen Sayers page - one of the 'likes' was from a Stephy Louise. According to her account she's married to someone with the surname Delonge, If that's her then this just get more weird

EDIT: I don't think it's the same person

 

[Catlover360]

It would be one hell of a set up if that was the case.

I've had a quick search on FB and found a Stephen Sayers page - one of the 'likes' was from a Stephy Louise. According to her account she's married to someone with the surname Delonge, If that's her then this just get more weird

View attachment 53930

I think the girl named Stephanie is who she says she is. As she has Facebook and Instagram etc. Just think either she has been taken for ride and used as a porn or she is in on it too? Who knows! It’s all bloody crazy. They are probably laughing at everyone trying to figure it out. But the jokes on them. While they have been busy doing all this I’ve had a lovely day with my family and haven’t given them a second thought! As soon as I leave this chat it’s out of sight out of mind personally.

 

[lemonelmo]

It would be one hell of a set up if that was the case.

I've had a quick search on FB and found a Stephen Sayers page - one of the 'likes' was from a Stephy Louise. According to her account she's married to someone with the surname Delonge, If that's her then this just get more weird

View attachment 53930

EDIT: I don't think it's the same person

Even if its not the same person, thats a weird wormhole you just entered

 

[String Man]

Even if its not the same person, thats a weird wormhole you just entered

It's definitely not her. The FB Steph has 3 boys whereas Twitter Steph has 3 girls and a boy.

Weird AF though re: the Delonge name