The Ingham Family #158 "I will pissin leak his address me" - Sarah Ingham

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Can someone tell me why Sarah dresses like a 16 year old ? Oh wait up I think we all know why šŸ¤¢šŸ¤¢šŸ¤¢šŸ¤¢šŸ¤¢šŸ¤¢ she is so weird . Also get your kids feet measured , Jaces feet were hanging out of them sandles and couldnā€™t walk in them properly . Measuring is free and places are open now .....
She will stand in the queues for primark but not for Clarkā€™s ā€œetc etcā€ to get her toddlers feet measured.
Talk about sort your priorities out!
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 34
Absolutely bleeping howling at the ingham family wardrobe page! These are billionaires!! šŸ¤£

Also re all the Covid talk, itā€™s an easing of restrictions not the end of lockdown. I think all the people playing the mental health with shopping cards, need to give their heads a wobble. For me, and I wonā€™t slate anyone taking their 4 kids round multiple shops, daily. Itā€™s just something, morally I wouldnā€™t do.

The ones that are buzzing atm will be the same ones screaming the loudest when we are back to harsh restrictions.

As always, my heart goes out to Isabelle. She wears clothes that are so unflattering, I think its because she doesn't have many, if any, peers to mix with and only has lazy's dreadful style influence. Those clothes she had on today were awful, truly awful, the trousers were too short, the trainers were naf and the top was the sort that you may wear for a proper forest dog walk, under a jacket.
It's sad as they, supposedly, have the money for decent items, but even if they buy cheap, she could still look good, she is a pretty girl, but that's all being hidden under awful styles and unstyled, greasy hair.
Another example of neglect, and its very sad.
Iā€™ve said it before (and I know itā€™s terrible comparing kids) you cannot compare that shell of a girl to the likes of Kaci from DVG etc. Not one of those girls has a role model, they arenā€™t being taught to be strong and independent woman. They are being shown to settle for a Gollum and be happy with it. Sarah really has let them down, they are going to go through life looking to men to guide them. The one male ā€˜role modelā€™ šŸ¤® canā€™t even build flat pack furniture, jump into cold water, protect them, grooms girls and has quite frankly made them a laughing stock of their peers. Itā€™s so bloody sad! And wonā€™t even start on how Chris will influence Jason in becoming a man one day!
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Sad
Reactions: 41
As much as I canā€™t stand the Inghams, arenā€™t we past shaming people leaving their houses?
Bearing in mind that these family vloggers have a largely young and impressionable audience, I do think it's important to call them out when their actions are questionable.

Technically, lockdown rules may allow them to go shopping as often as they like.....but morally, I believe that's not the case and that should be pointed out to the naive and brainwashed ifam.

Behaving legally and behaving morally are not always the same......now where have I heard that before :unsure:
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 36
I have not watched the vlog but do they have a new car. Esme was in the boot with her legs up to her chest so how can they buy stuff from IKEA and fit it in that car
I think it still the same car,they had two extra seats fitted in the boot
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Before they were saying they had multiple sofas delivered to the new house, have taken boxā€™s up to the new house but a new king size bed is getting delivered to the current house where they are sticking in the garage.

Sounds like the builder is stopping them getting anymore delivered there.

Where did they find these very very good friends Stacy and Terry?? They have never been mentioned before now they are the long lost bffs!!
They can't have taken over the new house officially as they would have needed to pay for it prior to getting keys etc. and they won't be able to pay for it until the money at least for their old house is paid so are they trying to kid that they own 2 properties at the moment and the buyers for their house must be daft to continue to wait for the exchange date personally I would just purchase another house and forget their exists

L
They say Pants for trousers where iam from
originally and that's North West .it maybe a regional thing .


On right move its still showing as subject to contract (minghams current house ) is this normal when they are saying the buyers are renting etc ???? All very suspicious šŸ‘€.
Contracts for the new house can't be exchanged until the buyers of their house sign their contract as Lazy and Creepy will not have the funds to pay for the new house until this has been done and the builder would not want them putting any of their items in the way of completing the house in time for them to move
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 10
But one of the main reasons that the infection rate is low (relatively speaking) is that we're only just easing out of lockdown restrictions! If we don't want to revert back to tighter lockdown measures then we have to exercise a bit of restraint and common sense.

So many people are yet to be vaccinated and we don't have herd immunity. Just because you are legally allowed to visit places it does not mean that you should traipse your family out every day for non essential reasons. I am certain that Boris, Whitty, Van Tam & co did not intend for whole families to use IKEA as a fun day out or visit multiple shops in one day picking up clothing for a child who has not even been born yet and already seems to have plenty.

I feel so sorry for shop workers who have to go to work and put themselves at risk (because there IS still risk) to cater to the whims of people who go out just to aimlessly browse, for something to do, and shop for crappy vlog content (most of which will probably go back for refunds), touching everything in sight and not wearing masks properly.

They Minghams do not need to be shopping every single day and don't need to go out en masse. To me they are incredibly selfish. They've been given an inch and are taking a dirty great mile, in the same way that they apparently met someone in a motorway service station when socialising indoors was forbidden. Their blatant disregard for others and for rules put in place to protect others makes me sick.

Rates are low due to lockdown and our highly effective vaccination roll-out, which has been proven to work as there hasn't been any significant spike coming out of Easter, which would have been expected otherwise.

The Ingham of course, as usual don't do things in moderation, and I agree, there's absolutely no need to be running around multiple shops every single day, but thats solely down to their very visible shopping addiction- i think they're pretty isolated in that sense.

My point was just that we really need to move away from constant shaming of people who like to be out and about meeting up with others, shopping, enjoying themselves and getting back to some sort of normality. I'm not the most sociable of people, so generally speaking i'm fine not jumping at the opportunity to hit the shops and pubs. However, I can appreciate that there's many others who crave social/ physical interaction.

The Inghams are really just an extreme case, as usual.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
Rates are low due to lockdown and our highly effective vaccination roll-out, which has been proven to work as there hasn't been any significant spike coming out of Easter, which would have been expected otherwise.

The Ingham of course, as usual don't do things in moderation, and I agree, there's absolutely no need to be running around multiple shops every single day, but thats solely down to their very visible shopping addiction- i think they're pretty isolated in that sense.

My point was just that we really need to move away from constant shaming of people who like to be out and about meeting up with others, shopping, enjoying themselves and getting back to some sort of normality. I'm not the most sociable of people, so generally speaking i'm fine not jumping at the opportunity to hit the shops and pubs. However, I can appreciate that there's many others who crave social/ physical interaction.

The Inghams are really just an extreme case, as usual.
Their shopping habits have nothing to do with social/physical interaction tho , its just two fingers up to those of us who have stuck by the rules and haven't shopped every bloody day during a pandemic
 
  • Like
Reactions: 25
Watching an old vlog back, the girls dressed so tidy and were shopping in Next/River Island, now reduced to cheap China imports from Shein, so sad to see how they have gone backwards so much in the way they dress and look.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 22
Most people will be sensible with shopping and not go every single day unlike shopaholic Lazy. Also there's no need to take your entire household, including a two year old who has no interest in endless traipsing round shops, to IKEA. I can't understand why Lazy would actually choose to take a baby/toddler/young child to the shops when she doesn't have to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 20
Rates are low due to lockdown and our highly effective vaccination roll-out, which has been proven to work as there hasn't been any significant spike coming out of Easter, which would have been expected otherwise.

The Ingham of course, as usual don't do things in moderation, and I agree, there's absolutely no need to be running around multiple shops every single day, but thats solely down to their very visible shopping addiction- i think they're pretty isolated in that sense.

My point was just that we really need to move away from constant shaming of people who like to be out and about meeting up with others, shopping, enjoying themselves and getting back to some sort of normality. I'm not the most sociable of people, so generally speaking i'm fine not jumping at the opportunity to hit the shops and pubs. However, I can appreciate that there's many others who crave social/ physical interaction.

The Inghams are really just an extreme case, as usual.
No-one would be shaming them if they had obeyed the rules and this was the first time they had been to non essential shops. No-one would be berating them for mixing socially. The problem is Sarah has been out shopping non essentially non stop. They are not meeting up with friends and gathering outdoors or in the garden. They have ignored lockdown rules since they arrived back to the U.K last year. They didn't even obey quarantine rules FFS.
Sarah is pregnant, yet has been out everyday dragging at least one of the kids with her. Filming, taking selfies with fans and touching everything which is very advised against. She says she can't wear a mask due to fainting, but is still able to drive!
I hope ikea has been notified of their antics because their behaviour is disgusting.

Now I don't believe for one minute Isabelle went shopping with a friend. In the segment she looked alone. No friend on camera, no voice. It could easily have been Esme with her. If the friend somehow didn't want to appear on camera then why bother with the camera in the first place!
But if by any chance she did go with someone then she has also broke rules and Sarah and the other girls parents have encouraged it.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Wow
Reactions: 31
As much as I canā€™t stand the Inghams, arenā€™t we past shaming people leaving their houses? I donā€™t get the anxiety people are still perpetuating about covid when the infection rate is barely even worth talking about anymore. Itā€™s not irresponsible to go out shopping as a family, meet outside with others etc. You say you donā€™t care restrictions have been lifted, thatā€™s good for you, but thereā€™s a hell of a lot of people who are very grateful that they have.

Iā€™m talking generally here, after reading your comments and others referring to the ā€œglobal pandemicā€, going on here in the U.K. ... šŸ¤£
Is it really about shaming people leaving their houses though? I think it's about being a bit more understanding and not trying to do everything all at once just because you can. I understand that a lot of people are very grateful that restrictions have been lifted and you don't want to judge them harshly but you're being a bit hard on people who still have Covid anxiety for whatever reason. Also as for claiming the infection rate is "barely even worth talking about any more" that's a pretty dangerous assumption to be making if you don't have the scientific evidence to back it up especially when seventy seven cases - possibly more by now - of the new Indian variant were discovered in London a couple of days ago. I'm a keyworker, I've seen how Covid ripped through the hospital I work in. We've all lost friends, colleagues and patients we cared about. Whenever I drive into work, I have to drive past a temporary mortuary that's been set up in a car park to help cope with the number of Covid deaths. Like it or not, the UK is part of the global pandemic and I don't think it's a matter for a laughing emoticon either.

P.S. Dear Moderators, apologies in advance if this looks like I'm telling people what they can or can't say. I don't think it is but if that's how it comes across then I'll accept that strike because I can't just sit back and say nothing. Also apologies for derailing the thread but again, too much has happened to just sit back and ignore this. I don't meant it as a personal attack either but he laughing emoticon was just a step too far.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 56
Is it really about shaming people leaving their houses though? I think it's about being a bit more understanding and not trying to do everything all at once just because you can. I understand that a lot of people are very grateful that restrictions have been lifted and you don't want to judge them harshly but you're being a bit hard on people who still have Covid anxiety for whatever reason. Also as for claiming the infection rate is "barely even worth talking about any more" that's a pretty dangerous assumption to be making if you don't have the scientific evidence to back it up especially when seventy seven cases - possibly more by now - of the new Indian variant were discovered in London a couple of days ago. I'm a keyworker, I've seen how Covid ripped through the hospital I work in. We've all lost friends, colleagues and patients we cared about. Whenever I drive into work, I have to drive past a temporary mortuary that's been set up in a car park to help cope with the number of Covid deaths. Like it or not, the UK is part of the global pandemic and I don't think it's a matter for a laughing emoticon either.

P.S. Dear Moderators, apologies in advance if this looks like I'm telling people what they can or can't say. I don't think it is but if that's how it comes across then I'll accept that strike because I can't just sit back and say nothing. Also apologies for derailing the thread but again, too much has happened to just sit back and ignore this. I don't meant it as a personal attack either but he laughing emoticon was just a step too far.
This šŸ‘šŸ»šŸ‘šŸ»
Said it so much better than me. Drives me insane when people have struggled, lost people and worked their asses off everyday to be told the pandemic isnā€™t real. If people like that lazy cow (Sarah if it wasnā€™t clear) did a real days work in her life, she wouldnā€™t be flitting from one discount shop to the next.

Thank you šŸ˜˜
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 39
Is it really about shaming people leaving their houses though? I think it's about being a bit more understanding and not trying to do everything all at once just because you can. I understand that a lot of people are very grateful that restrictions have been lifted and you don't want to judge them harshly but you're being a bit hard on people who still have Covid anxiety for whatever reason. Also as for claiming the infection rate is "barely even worth talking about any more" that's a pretty dangerous assumption to be making if you don't have the scientific evidence to back it up especially when seventy seven cases - possibly more by now - of the new Indian variant were discovered in London a couple of days ago. I'm a keyworker, I've seen how Covid ripped through the hospital I work in. We've all lost friends, colleagues and patients we cared about. Whenever I drive into work, I have to drive past a temporary mortuary that's been set up in a car park to help cope with the number of Covid deaths. Like it or not, the UK is part of the global pandemic and I don't think it's a matter for a laughing emoticon either.

P.S. Dear Moderators, apologies in advance if this looks like I'm telling people what they can or can't say. I don't think it is but if that's how it comes across then I'll accept that strike because I can't just sit back and say nothing. Also apologies for derailing the thread but again, too much has happened to just sit back and ignore this. I don't meant it as a personal attack either but he laughing emoticon was just a step too far.
completely agree. Itā€™s about behaving responsibly isnā€™t it? I met my brother in a pub garden yesterday so Iā€™m not doing nothing - Iā€™m enjoying the relaxation of lockdown. But Iā€™m not flouncing around multiple places coming into contact with loads of people. They could actually be responsible couldnā€™t they and order the lat flow tests and blog doing them ā€œitā€™s not nice but worth it to know weā€™re not spreading a deadly disease, the more people do this the more free we can all beā€ etc
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 20
completely agree. Itā€™s about behaving responsibly isnā€™t it? I met my brother in a pub garden yesterday so Iā€™m not doing nothing - Iā€™m enjoying the relaxation of lockdown. But Iā€™m not flouncing around multiple places coming into contact with loads of people. They could actually be responsible couldnā€™t they and order the lat flow tests and blog doing them ā€œitā€™s not nice but worth it to know weā€™re not spreading a deadly disease, the more people do this the more free we can all beā€ etc
So true, they could be inadvertently be spreading the virus and they wouldnā€™t really care because they need to create a vlog.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 12
It wouldn't be so bad them going out now that more is allowed, if they hadn't already been going to shops daily anyway.

Most people would rather not take 4 kids to Ikea anyway. If people are taking children (and sometimes I have, I'm not saying they shouldn't ever go!), I expect that they do not start running around like it's a playground, and do not start playing/touching everything. I wouldn't allow my children to behave like that in a shop, so would appreciate it if others did the same. Of course it's even more annoying right now where people are supposed to still be keeping a distance from others when possible, so having a family of 6 wandering all over the place makes this a bit more difficult for others. They were also in Ikea buying new furniture just after Christmas, so it's not like they urgently need to go just because it's open.

They have gotten to a point where shops = their only content. Multiple other things opened this week that would have made for better content, been more entertaining for the children (or some of them - with the large age gaps they will not realistically find much that they all genuinely enjoy) but just more shops is the easy way and also helps with Sarah's shopping addiction. If they ever do move, the new house will very quickly be filled up with random tat that no one actually wants because Sarah won't stop buying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17
Itā€™s really sad (and boring for the kids and viewers) that the week restrictions relax all she can think of to do is to take the kids shopping everyday. They could go to play farms, mini golf, swimming etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 26
The only dimension of personality Lazy has is an addiction to money and she can't resist showing off how rich they are. I agree that they shouldn't be taking all the kids shopping. If Lazy really has to go then she should take Isabelle and make Creepy stay at home with the younger three.

The reason restrictions are being lifted so slowly is because the number of infections could rise again. We have to be so, so careful and people like the Inghams are not helping to keep the number low.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 22
Can I just say I find that 'strawberry milky' post/comment by Chris really bleeping weird. I don't know if any of you have seen it but it's a tiktok trend amongst a slightly younger age group (I'd say around age 14-16, I've seen people who are in their twenties use it but I think it's a 'younger' trend personally) to say something like "popping a choccy milk to make the pain go away" - sort of saying 'oh, life is rough but we can't/don't want to drink away the pain yet so we have to drink chocolate milk/strawberry milk'. And out of all the trends to join in on I find that one bleeping weird! Why pander to a 'young' trend like that? It's different to the dancing trends I think - anyone can do a tiktok dancing trend - yeah okay in Chris' case it's a bit tragic but the dances in themselves are harmless. But, considering he's a grown man and can drink why feel the need to be 'relatable' like that with that particular comment? It's sort of implying 'I'm just like you' sort of thing. Why? Obviously we know why but :sick:

Maybe people will think this is a reach, I just think it's grim.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
  • Wow
Reactions: 35
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.