The Chateau Diaries #246 Stephanie's Patreons are like mushrooms - kept in the dark and fed shyte.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Order Thread by Most Liked Posts
S

Summerbaby

Exactly my point.
I have said this before, @Clara Burnett never truly personally interacted on TL with any members did s/he? It was always some kind of "sermon on the mount" type scenario from her side! Well, that was how I always felt it appeared. Fair enough - she loved the attention/accolade, no skin off my nose as I am defo not an attention seeker!
Personally, I don't give a FF whoever s/he was/is!
But, if you read closely, everything was always rather open ended, e.g. let's drop some kind of bomb and then simply walk away and let everybody here on TL ruminate/question in connection with her initial bomb, e.g. especially her comments regarding age of consent where PJ was concerned - but, hey when asked for additional evidence/details, s/he couldn't possibly comment further! Why not? There are a few other examples of that happening too, think Ollie etc!
Nah, her commentary wasn't doing it for me! If you put it out there, in my book then you should be prepared to follow through with evidence of those allegations, otherwise zip it and keep
 
Last edited:
Reactions: 16

Kalessi

UvulaDonor said:
I don't think 'type' and 'good in bed' are necessarily the same thing...............
Click to expand...
Super true statement. I had a “fling” once with someone I would never be in a relationship with and it was the best I’ve ever had! He had me at hello in a good way. But, alas. He wasn’t my type.
 
Reactions: 21
S

Summerbaby

Jack Whitehall still looks like a uni student to me, 'nuff said in the hygiene stakes! Plus, an ex-colleague of mine actually went to Uni with him and her friend went out with him. He comes across as a really down to earth cheeky chappie, BUT, hey, in real life - he was always a "posh" boy who looked down on others less wealthy, without a doubt from what I have been told!
 
Reactions: 9
G

graciemckitten

The baby doll attended Tess Hoffman’s wedding but asked for her face to be concealed in this photo.

 
Reactions: 26

M&MsMom

God, yes - can you imagine? Accused of being related to who I consider the most boring and tasteless people on YouTube? That offended me more than being considered a flying monkey! In all seriousness, though, I was in corporate sales for almost 30 years and have been thrown out of buildings by Secret Service (literally picked up under each arm by two burly looking guys in blue suits and sunglasses and physically carried to the street! I'm just thankful to have not been arrested!), stupid looking "wannabe police" security guards and angry admin assistants.......I have a thick skin, too!

At the end of the day, there should be room for all of us here! Differences in opinion are what make the world go 'round and are what challenge me to a different world view. I am as wary of "absolutes" as I am by conjecture. I am saddened by what has happened here recently and while I miss some of the original hags (most of whom were gone long before this past month or two of drama) and I will always honor all of the detective work they did in the beginning**, I not only have a thick skin but I also have two feet planted in reality: time marches on. People move on.

**which I have read - all of it! It's why I sometimes, like yesterday with that couple Jodi and her husband, can't remember who or when, but I know I've read it here before!
 
Reactions: 29

Fennelbug

Summerbaby said:
We have still to see photographic evidence of whether PJ actually was invited/or attended as SJ's + 1. If so, no doubt dressed as some kind of 19th century "dandy" in OTT attire and ribbons (maybe flowers too) in his hair.
Click to expand...
Snorts is embarrassing
 
Reactions: 26
S

Summerbaby

Fennelbug said:
Snorts is embarrassing
Click to expand...
Of course he is, no doubt whatsoever about it!
And, I would wager, that all of SJ's "so called friends, e.g. fake ones", are constantly laughing behind her back in connection with their relationship too. It's 100% a given!
For the love of God. Any "real" friend would have organised an intervention long before now!
But, hey, SJ doesn't have any real friends does she? 'Nuff said!
 
Last edited:
Reactions: 18

Imperious Me

UvulaDonor said:
I quite like them too but NOT through the septum - hate hate hate. I don't even like it on a pig's nose or a bull's nose.
---

Was that thrown out there so we would think she is someone at the wedding? Oh GAWD I'm rubbish at this cryptic shit.
Click to expand...
She was with the clean up crew...
 
Reactions: 13

LurkingMeg

I think so too. All the frenemies cheering her on while thinking it's absolutely hilarious and more than a little pathetic.
 
Reactions: 17

pink roses

Fennelbug said:
Snorts is embarrassing
Click to expand...
Not only embarrassing …also vile!
He has no room to call anyone horse face, or elephant ,or whatever names he calls the château characters. I wonder what they call him behind his back!
 
Reactions: 28
G

graciemckitten

LurkingMeg said:
I think so too. All the frenemies cheering her on while thinking it's absolutely hilarious and more than a little pathetic.
Click to expand...
Stephanie Jarvis has no true friends because she is a not a true friend to anyone ( including the neglected and exploited animals at the Dump).

Why does idiot Fanny start most of her videos encouraging Thor’s mating efforts with his immediate relatives?
---
Summerbaby said:
Dana's outfit looks rather good. Although, will hold final judgement until the full frontal version is revealed, e.g. hopefully not down to her naval with her boobs hanging out, FFS!
Click to expand...
How can she wear 4 inch heels on grass?
 
Reactions: 20

OhIDontKnow...

Looking at pics of Tess’ Hubbys chateau, it’s an ugly one. Not somewhere I’d like to be frankly.
 
Reactions: 16
S

Summerbaby

Well, at least they weren't micro spiked heels, were they? Far more chunkier to cope with the terrain and, more age appropriate - she is no spring chicken!
Will hold back on final judgement on her outfit until I see a full frontal version. BUT, her hair at least looks natural - unlike others!
I have always rather liked Dana, even though @Clara Burnett, hated her guts! Maybe something else to question and a lesson learned from that too then?
 
Reactions: 9

Just Grift Wood

be interesting to know how long Stephanie has known her/his identity? I sometimes think Tattle actually helps Fanny
 
Reactions: 19

Jules100

I think Tess’ funky rich wedding is going to make Stephanie finally want to get fake married to Philip. All that being the center of attention, presents and derailing… and YouTube content.
 
Reactions: 44
G

graciemckitten

OhIDontKnow... said:
Looking at pics of Tess’ Hubbys chateau, it’s an ugly one. Not somewhere I’d like to be frankly.
Click to expand...
It is ironic that the cost of admission a few years ago was 6 euros, the price Fanny paid for her latest dress at emmaus.

Why haven’t we seen Mummy wearing any of the dresses phi phi and Fanny purchased specifically at her request?
 
Reactions: 18

MadameChat

graciemckitten said:
It is ironic that the cost of admission a few years ago was 6 euros, the price Fanny paid for her latest dress at emmaus.

Why haven’t we seen Mummy wearing any of the dresses phi phi and Fanny purchased specifically at her request?
Click to expand...
Because they’re horrible
 
Reactions: 23
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Menu
Log in
Register