I do hope we all get to see this ......so many people "have stuff" on her and if just one decides to talk ..... maybe it will open the flood gates???
I do hope we all get to see this ......so many people "have stuff" on her and if just one decides to talk ..... maybe it will open the flood gates???And of course, the biggest screw up, allegedly misusing the non profit association to grab tax free funds which are clearly not spent properly on restoration work or Fanny would have no problems revealing where every bit of Patreon funding has been spent.
Fanny has knives potentially at her back from all of these people/entities that she has screwed over or cheated and may have to face accountability at some point. Think of the dozens of people who have the dirt on the little orphan princess that could cause her criminal or financial issues.
Isabelle6541 was studious at teasing, chiming in. And just when we thought she was out and about in her camo, just when we’d fuss a little wishing her well - she’d jump in again. Nothing wrong in posting a picture, offering another tease WHILST SHE OR HE WAS THERE. But that didn’t happen. Travel has nothing to do with it, she could have zinged a snappy picture or two or way. It is wholly unlike her, as she was so game to tease - and I repeat, as many of us did - you have a team on the ground, going in - your mouth is shut, until after. But Isabelle6541 could not wait to roll it all out.
Clara on the other hand has a credible writing style, very good with words and leads - has a few tricks in her bag, and staunch comments. But there are times that I could play Clara as well, and store the pot. I know Clara is a folk hero here. And maybe that’s part of the game as well.
Anyway. . . . . . .
All of her misdeeds are intertwined: if her YouTube misdeeds are revealed, that can influence her Patreon funding by deterring Patrons: if her Patreon misdeeds are revealed, that could influences Patreon funding and the YouTube following, which affects her monthly income; all of these could affect channel 4 DIY and the boost to her YouTube accounts and credibility; if her gift grab misdeeds are revealed, it can affect her monthly income thru YouTube or Patreon or thru the loss of transactional donations and free gifts; if her Patron funding misuse is revealed, it can lead to potential criminal/ civil problems and can adversely affect her inclusion in the DIY seres, affect her Patron funding and the popularity of her you tube channels, high affects her monthly income. Ant of these misdeeds can affect the new travel channel she started.I do hope we all get to see this ......so many people "have stuff" on her and if just one decides to talk ..... maybe it will open the flood gates???
Mummy is strategic, excellent point. But written American English? Maybe not so much. I also think she's too crabby to play a long game like that? Blows up in the laundry room, big time, attacks Snorts' €8 chandelier? Interested in your analysis.Perhaps not, but mummy is. And the name is Isabelle afterall…
I find it odd that Nick hasn’t been there with his family much this year. Maybe it was just because of lock downs but it felt like they used to visit a few times throughout the year. If they’ve sold their share, why not just say?If I'm honest I'm doubting ALL the alleged intelligence coming in about the HMN. A lot doesn't add up. Lots of crumbs dropped, but as of the last few month very little connects into solid evidence. It's all so deflating. I truly thought it was her time up, Stephanie Jarvis would be exposed as the fraud she is with a camera rammed in her face, wrinkles and all, scrambling for excuses etc.... We have no word from our reporter team claiming to be on the ground and no definite evidence that Clara was there during the Patron days. Does a recording really exist? Who records during an argument?... stuff from movies. Phyllis is meant to have been involved with something concerned with an age of consent. Phyllis is getting kicked out the HMN at the earliest opportunity. Next, Phyllis is engaged to Stephanie....??? Nick is selling up? Who do you believe when there is no concrete evidence for anything?
One plausible reason, Antoine is a big kid now and has more important, and kid-friendly, things to do during his vacay.I find it odd that Nick hasn’t been there with his family much this year. Maybe it was just because of lock downs but it felt like they used to visit a few times throughout the year. If they’ve sold their share, why not just say?
There was an apparent cat and mouse situation going on. After a particular meaty observation from one poster the next thing we know there were really scandalous accusations from another poster. It was tit for tat for awhile and like you I'm doubting all intelligence coming from the shit show. I could not imagine that there was going to be a confrontation from anyone at the faux garden parties.If I'm honest I'm doubting ALL the alleged intelligence coming in about the HMN. A lot doesn't add up. Lots of crumbs dropped, but as of the last few months very little connects into solid evidence. It's all so deflating. I truly thought it was her time up, Stephanie Jarvis would be exposed as the fraud she is with a camera rammed in her face, wrinkles and all, scrambling for excuses etc.... We have no word from our reporter team claiming to be on the ground and no definite evidence that Clara was there during the Patron days. Does a recording really exist? Who records during an argument?... stuff from movies. Phyllis is meant to have been involved with something concerned with an age of consent. Phyllis is getting kicked out the HMN at the earliest opportunity. Next, Phyllis is engaged to Stephanie....??? Nick is selling up? Who do you believe when there is no concrete evidence for anything? I think it's also telling much like the HMN and Stephanie's pre-Covid 19 friends not returning many of the Tartlet Ons have left. I wonder why?
Agree likely not Mummy with her temper a but what about Percy?Mummy is strategic, excellent point. But written American English? Maybe not so much. I also think she's too crabby to play a long game like that? Blows up in the laundry room, big time, attacks Snorts' €8 chandelier? Interested in your analysis.
I know we’re all wondering if we got scammed. I do think the the threat of a tattler walking amongst them would be enough to at least make Fannys back go out. So, if that is all that was accomplished I’m happy with that. For now.
And if she discovers the damage to her beloved wallpaper and then discovers your identity, can she come after you legally?Penises are not so much my style or preference when it comes to leaving my mark, but believe me: if she finds it she will know what I mean.
There are several camps here. I'm here for entertainment purposes only. I have no grand scheme to bring Fanny and Co. down. They are not that big in the world, small potatoes really. I don't live in France, I don't know tax or labor laws, and I don't care. I'm sure the French government, like most western modern institutions, are very busy with bigger fish than Fanny and her shitshow. I know some here are out for blood, good luck. This is just a gossip forum, not a court of law. I scroll by all the legal mumble jumble posted here as I have never thought it would go anywhere, and I still don't. I have serious doubts about Isabella or Clara doing anything, it would have been too easy for Fanny's watchdogs to just run them of the property, even call the police for trespassing and being threatening. The fans aren't going to change, how long has all this been going on? Years! If the bloody fans want to send her money and gifts, well that's their business. As far as I know, they're all adults, and it's legal. Like so many have said over and over, if they weren't drooling over Fanny, it would be someone else. Cons and victims come and go and exist everywhere. I've probably upset a few tattlers, but this is still a place where people are free to express their opinions without slandering anyone. Now, I'm going to look for some entertaining comments!I questioned @Isabelle6541 quite a few threads back and got pounced on. It seemed so foundation-less and I hope I am wrong, but it did appear very amateurish thus my "famous five" comment which would be in line with Fanny'scharacter. So we enjoy the banter or we plan something solid, or we just wait and watch for to to die a natural death, which ultimately it will. I do still muse on whether we are as sad as the cult followers, sure I enjoy the chat but we are just as obsessed by her- but not making any real difference?
Good idea not to post a pic of it. I can just imagine them looking for it as someone else also mentioned.And if she discovers the damage to her beloved wallpaper and then discovers your identity, can she come after you legally?
Nothing political meant at all here but I was always amused by President Trump signing and and handing out pens ! Come on King Charles III.
Ink Well Gate part 2.. Johnny the Bonnie to the rescue, Our Hero
A light meal in the fish shack tonight, mama.I know we’re all wondering if we got scammed. I do think the the threat of a tattler walking amongst them would be enough to at least make Fannys back go out. So, if that is all that was accomplished I’m happy with that. For now.
Off the topic of the royals, a small story to share...I'm not sure I'd conclude that from this. What I would conclude from this piece is that it is extremely likely the "officials" in this case aren't from the local police station. And that it didn't take somebody dropping a dime on him to get them to act.
Nobody says "no" to him, and by many accounts, people have been telling him how smart he is all his life. Diana did not fall in line; others who challenge or disagree with him are also angrily ghosted.
Book review: Rebel Prince: The Power, Passion and Defiance of Prince Charles by Tom Bower
I am sure Prince Charles will love being called a Rebel Prince, but after that it’s downhill all the way. Tom Bower explores all the usual criticisms of the heir to the throne (petulant, whinging, selfish, ungrateful, disloyal), but adds a few more, such as ruthless and venal, which we’ll come to lawww.thetimes.co.uk TOM BOWER: Prince Charles has jeopardised his reign
TOM BOWER: The revelation that he took bags stuffed with €500 banknotes exposes Prince Charles to accusations of appalling bad judgment.www.dailymail.co.uk
By not posting any pics, there's no evidence anything was done. Hmm...how convenient.Good idea not to post a pic of it. I can just imagine them looking for it as someone else also mentioned. View attachment 1569828
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?