I did...I was actually very polite. No response.This
Has anyone tried to contact her on Instagram to discuss her ... statement?
I did...I was actually very polite. No response.This
Has anyone tried to contact her on Instagram to discuss her ... statement?
Careful, she gets turned on when you mention her. Thereāll be endless stories about how sheās thrilled the ātattle trollsā mentioned her![]()
Who even IS this jumped up prick?
Orbyn has met Susie probably 2-3 times. Iām sure of this. Not prepared to give myself away further.
She creams herself because she met Nigella once and they talk on Twitter. Itās sad.
I agree actually- the entire speech was badly worded, which makes me think she did write it herself. She uses the wrong word often.Fully prepared to get my head bitten off here - but to provide a slightly different opinion. And to be clear I still think the āapologyā or lack thereof is fully of tit.
but at the beginning when she said āitās not important whether I said these things 5 or 6 years ago. Context is not importantā etc etc
What I thought she was saying is;
Ive come to realise itās not important when these things were said or the context in which there were said, but the fact they were said at all is wrong.
Obviously who knows but thatās how I heard it.
She also meant multitude rather than dichotomy and facilitate was the wrong word. she definitely wrote it herself. the stern pauses too... what a car crashI agree actually- the entire speech was badly worded, which makes me think she did write it herself. She uses the wrong word often.
I donāt think she meant āwhether or notā she sent the text, but regardless off / inspite of.
Also when she said she canāt āfacilitateā killing her self I think she meant she wonāt have those kind of comments - again, wrongly worded.
Either way, hope she never gets any āinstaā work again.
Candice and Susie are not friends - if theyāve ever met itās been at a panel or some other tit. Candice freely declares non of these insta huns are her mates.
Get what youāre saying, and itās sort of how I heard it too...but the lack of apology can not be denied. The re-framing of herself as victim cannot be ignored either. Agh. I want to forgive and forget but itās hard. Iām still following as now once I unfollow I canāt see the content afterwards!Fully prepared to get my head bitten off here - but to provide a slightly different opinion. And to be clear I still think the āapologyā or lack thereof is fully of tit.
but at the beginning when she said āitās not important whether I said these things 5 or 6 years ago. Context is not importantā etc etc
What I thought she was saying is;
Ive come to realise itās not important when these things were said or the context in which there were said, but the fact they were said at all is wrong.
Obviously who knows but thatās how I heard it.
Same, which shows how smart it was to go private as itās definitely going to help retain her follower numbers.Iām still following as now once I unfollow I canāt see the content afterwards!
Agreed.Same, which shows how smart it was to go private as itās definitely going to help retain her follower numbers.
I honestly think she just wants to make sure she gets her magazine wedding deal then she'll fade away.Agreed.
Her followers are down by 2K.
Surely it would be unwise for her to continue posting or āblogging/vloggingā her life as she has supposedly received threats directed at wher and, horrifyingly, her children?![]()
I see what you're saying but the fact that she then goes on to attempt to give the context (6 or 7 years ago, said in jest, steeped in sarcasm, not as controversial) is the issue for me as it shows she is trying to excuse her actions, even if she is indeed saying the opposite! That's why it's such a joke to me.Fully prepared to get my head bitten off here - but to provide a slightly different opinion. And to be clear I still think the āapologyā or lack thereof is fully of tit.
but at the beginning when she said āitās not important whether I said these things 5 or 6 years ago. Context is not importantā etc etc
What I thought she was saying is;
Ive come to realise itās not important when these things were said or the context in which there were said, but the fact they were said at all is wrong.
Obviously who knows but thatās how I heard it.
She should just be accepting sheās effed up MASSIVELY and with that comes the loss of lucrative deals, like Hello/OK magazine paying for your wedding (the wedding you could easily afford yourself, no doubt)I honestly think she just wants to make sure she gets her magazine wedding deal then she'll fade away.
We all know how it looks is important to her.
Que Susie's windswept hair and sultry veneers face.
Greg looking constipated and like chandler bing.
It'll all be very stylish, sophisticated and dull.
She's so vain. So fickle and has no substance.
She should just be accepting sheās effed up MASSIVELY and with that comes the loss of lucrative deals, like Hello/OK magazine paying for your wedding (the wedding you could easily afford yourself, no doubt)
Who knows, maybe sheāll try to redeem herself by offering her wedding photos to the mag in return for a donation to charity? And pigs might fly...
I wonder if anyone has contacted the magazines?
So sheās is active again on stories??hello and ok magazine need telling of these tweets....they need to back away slowly
Sheās sharing an Akala podcast on stories today....
hello and ok magazine need telling of these tweets....they need to back away slowly
Sheās sharing an Akala podcast on stories today....
I think sheās posted a story to test the waters with her followers.hello and ok magazine need telling of these tweets....they need to back away slowly
Sheās sharing an Akala podcast on stories today....