Still loads for me xLooks like it. It's not there on that link anymore!
Still loads for me xLooks like it. It's not there on that link anymore!
And me.Still loads for me x
And me.
Along with the one below.
This is just the kind of thing I’d expect from an ex-student of The Nuts Magazine Journalism Apprenticeship Scheme.
![]()
'Greg just willy slapped me' Olympian's manhood breaks girlfriend's glasses
AN OLYMPIC gold medallist "willy slapped" his girlfriend so hard he nearly broke her glasses.www.google.co.uk
Weird. When I click the link on here or find through Google the story isn't on there anymore!Still loads for me x
The gleam team are clearly exhausted after their efforts of the past few days to hush this up!Surprised the Wikipedia comments about her haven't disappeared yet!
I had wondered if they could claim that harassing her / Persuing it would be similar to the press hounding of Caroline Flack? Pure speculation on my part, but papers would be keen to avoid a similar accusation.Sorry if I am being dense, but under what grounds could they make the newspaper remove the article? I mean, the tweets are clearly hers so she can’t claim libel or similar?
Following up on this I also noticed that in his biography Greg talked about meeting Susie on Twitter and thinking she was funny, so if the plan is for him to disavow knowledge of the stuff she wrote back then (as if THEN was even that long ago) then his book is gonna disprove that straightawY. You can’t unprint a book!
Could it be for Greg or FOD, or both?Ultimate Girl Gang has thinly referenced this in her stories today I think.. not in so many words but it’s definitely a dig...
I just came on to post this...I’ve found the discussions on here about whether Greg should/shouldn’t be judged/penalised for Susie’s views/tweets really interesting as people have raised points I’ve maybe not considered (on both sides of the discussion) and while people have disagreed it’s not been a slanging match/cancel culture approach - us Tattle ‘trolls’ really could teach the Insta mummies a thing or two. UGG is clearly referencing both Greg and FOD right? Amazingly I think FOD has more chance of claiming ignorance to his wife’s comments than Greg does in this case (though FOD is just as guilty at avoiding the racist elephant in the room).
I think someone somewhere is working very hard to keep it out of the mainstream press. BrummyMummyof2 was in the papers when she made her DV jokes, she has 111k followers. Susie closed her account with 125k, Greg has 162k- plus he has some fame away from insta even if Susie doesnt. So this must be being seriously hushed up.I literally know nothing about father of daughters . So I had a look at his profile. I was so shocked at how many more subs he had than both Susie and Greg.
He has loadssssss
I wonder now if more people didn't speak up about Susie and Greg because despite their own sense of self importance they are relatively unpopular on social media in the grand scheme of things.
Weird.
I think it's probably more of a tit for tat thing with her PR and the press. Delete this story about Susie and we'll give you some other stories you can publish and get loads of clicks on instead.Sorry if I am being dense, but under what grounds could they make the newspaper remove the article? I mean, the tweets are clearly hers so she can’t claim libel or similar?