Get us the proof! They want rid of her why wouldn’t they try and gain sympathy for her
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Reporting on facts doesn’t have to be done with the intention of gaining sympathyGet us the proof! They want rid of her why wouldn’t they try and gain sympathy for her
They’re trying to portray her as a grieving mother and housewife that done nothing else only cooked her husband’s dinner
Are they?They’re trying to portray her as a grieving mother and housewife that done nothing else only cooked her husband’s dinner
Aren't Bangladesh saying she isn't a citizen though and never was. She was born here, raised her and her parents paid tax here. I can't see how we (we bring the Uk) can argue that makes her a Bangladesh citizen.
Where do you get off implying someone has mental health issues, just because you don't agree with them?
If you actually bothered to do some research, you will find he is actually a Journalist and Documentary maker.
Maybe you should look in the mirror before making unfounded remarks about others....
Exactly. Glad we're on the same page.Yeah, let the Syrians deal with her. She's their responsibility now
Who is? If you mean me, please quote me.They’re trying to portray her as a grieving mother and housewife that done nothing else only cooked her husband’s dinner
From their law you can only have dual citizenship until the age of 21, after 21 if you have another citizenship you lose your Bangladeshi one. However because the UK revoked her British citizenship at 19 she therefore still has her Bangladeshi one. The reason Bangladesh aren’t dealing with her is because they don’t want to, who wants another terrorist sympathiser in their country? And the reason she’s fighting the have her UK one back is because the moment she steps foot in Bangladesh she will be arrested and the penalty is a death sentence.
Woah woah woah, lets not get it twisted.
Pretty much everyone in this thread disagrees with me and you will see I have not questioned anyone's mental health.
I read the story he sold to the Daily Mail. Why should I have to research further? He's an attention seeker that gets his kicks touring dangerous places that a lot of poor people have no choice but to call home.
Anyone that visits North Korea or a Syrian concentration camp to leer at the people trapped there and then sell stories to the Daily Mail need their head checked. Last I checked we do still have freedom of speech in the UK and I am as entitled to my opinion as you are.
the fact they have her on the front page posing like she’s some sort of fashion model is disgusting. Reminds me of the Rolling Stones front cover on the Boston terrorist.She’s went from this to this in a very short space of timeView attachment 1981453View attachment 1981454
Without going into loads of detail as it's been covered before, as part of her appeal SIAC heard expert testimony that Bangladeshi law says that she became a Bangladeshi citizen through her parents when she was born ('i.e. by descent"). Also that she can hold dual citizenship (Bangladeshi and British) until she is 21. She must then apply to renew her Bangladeshi citizenship.
In fact both the government and Shamima's experts more or less agreed that was what the written Bangladeshi law says. However, Shamima's experts and legal team said that because the court system in Bangladesh is corrupt, the government would be likely to tell the courts to ignore what the written law says and rule that she is not a Bangladeshi citizen. They argued that while in law (de jure) she was a Bangladeshi citizen, in practice (de facto) she wasn't because the Bangladeshi government wouldn't allow it.The Bangladeshi Minister of Foreign Affairs statement that she wasn't a and never was a citizen demonstrated that.
SIAC ruled that as a matter of fact the Bangladeshi law said that she was a citizen and the fact that in practice Bangladesh would never agree should not be considered.
Last edited:
I mean you did say ‘I'd say anyone that believes the DM danger tourist should also be seen my a mental health professional.’ which is questioning someone’s mental health.
I don’t agree with what this man does, going to visit poor unstable countries is uncomfortable but I wouldn’t discount what he’s saying about her just based on that.
That’s hardly sympathetic coverage I would say. It also seems to be part of the promo for the BBC podcast - which no, it’s not the most sympathetic thing to her because she clearly struggles to come off as sympatheticShe’s went from this to this in a very short space of time
I stand by that. It doesn't mean I accuse anyone that disagrees with me of being mentally ill. If I did, that would be all I ever posted in this thread as I am in the minority.
Looks like they’re trying to make her fit in to the society she left behind.
I get the impression that anything other than "hang the witch" or "let her rot" is considered sympathetic by some.
What happened to her morality or does it come with the outfit
Less fashion model more socially awkward Penguin
- Status