Surprisingly, men with auta/power/incredible brains, are sometimes more shaggable than pin up types. I remember being at university, and far preferred men who kept my attention!He must use Sex Panther or something. How to women find him in any way an attractive proposition. All the money in the world isn’t making that straw headed scarecrow shaggable.
Because politically he needed the family man appearance to help keep voters on side. It was about image more than anything else.Can’t muster up any sympathy for Carrie if that old shagger Boris is cheating on her. He cheated with her when his Mrs was undergoing cancer treatment. Her low morals are a match for his. The thing I don’t get with Boris, why get wed? Don’t have a problem with him being a shagger. But why commit to someone, have kids and then carry on as a career shagger. He is one of those guys who likes the chase. He should just stay single.
Even if the Caines have gold-plated nursing care, the family no doubt feel the need to be accessible. I don't know how the daughter's plea panned out but I can understand her wish to be able to visit an aged parent.I would have thought Michael Caine could afford to pay qualified nurses for round the clock care if he was that frail.
As his wife she gets half his assets doesn’t she? When they inevitably divorce that is.Can’t muster up any sympathy for Carrie if that old shagger Boris is cheating on her. He cheated with her when his Mrs was undergoing cancer treatment. Her low morals are a match for his. The thing I don’t get with Boris, why get wed? Don’t have a problem with him being a shagger. But why commit to someone, have kids and then carry on as a career shagger. He is one of those guys who likes the chase. He should just stay single.
We have discussed the footballer on the footballer wag thread. He plays for the Gunners. He likes to have a party judging by his surname allegedly.Could be the same person here?
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league-player-bail-extended-29066809
Edit: I know that it just says sporting personality and not sports player etc but it's not McGuinness. He's not a sporting star. He hosts a sports show but he's not involved in sports in any way shape or form. Also to my knowledge he doesn't have any previous legal troubles. I know we don't like him but we can't blame him for everything
Or maybe we can. Oi, Paddy, sort my gas bill out!
I think there was footage of Yvette slagging him off during an interval break from one of the 'Live' shows.I can’t remember if it’s this thread in which I mentioned seeing him live. He must have been legit as He picked me and my aunt. Everything he said was correct how did he know? They were things only we knew.
The Mary loves Dick was hilarious though.. He didn’t get on with Yvette at all so maybe he said it to take the piss
---
Maybe he wants the best of both? Greedy, needy and egotistical people do and they know how to turn on the charm. Any woman who gets it on with him ought to know the score by now. And it's quite a score, with that chunky monkey.Can’t muster up any sympathy for Carrie if that old shagger Boris is cheating on her. He cheated with her when his Mrs was undergoing cancer treatment. Her low morals are a match for his. The thing I don’t get with Boris, why get wed? Don’t have a problem with him being a shagger. But why commit to someone, have kids and then carry on as a career shagger. He is one of those guys who likes the chase. He should just stay single.
I wouldn't class Boris as lazy or workshy as such, he will work hard...but at what he wants not what his actual job role isThe thing with Carrie is that despite knowing exactly what BoJo was like (his behaviour - lazy, workshy, compulsive liar, serial shagger etc was common knowledge and well documented in the Press, not just the odd rumour), she still thought ‘yeah, that’s the man I want to be the father of my children’. The mind boggles…..
There has to be some level of brain power there. I used to work with a guy who was utterly gorgeous, but he was also dumb as a brick¹ and at times it was almost difficult to have a normal conversation with him. He was also straight, so I wouldn't have had much chance anyway, but that's a different issue.Surprisingly, men with auta/power/incredible brains, are sometimes more shaggable than pin up types. I remember being at university, and far preferred men who kept my attention!
Absolutely.The thing with Carrie is that despite knowing exactly what BoJo was like (his behaviour - lazy, workshy, compulsive liar, serial shagger etc was common knowledge and well documented in the Press, not just the odd rumour), she still thought ‘yeah, that’s the man I want to be the father of my children’. The mind boggles…..
It does specifically say in the poisoning the partner article that the allegations does not involve rape or sexual assaultCould be the same person here?
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league-player-bail-extended-29066809
Edit: I know that it just says sporting personality and not sports player etc but it's not McGuinness. He's not a sporting star. He hosts a sports show but he's not involved in sports in any way shape or form. Also to my knowledge he doesn't have any previous legal troubles. I know we don't like him but we can't blame him for everything
Or maybe we can. Oi, Paddy, sort my gas bill out!
My brain is still in 2005 with regards to Arsenal players so this took a google. He does like to Partey.We have discussed the footballer on the footballer wag thread. He plays for the Gunners. He likes to have a party judging by his surname allegedly.
Theoretically it could, if it involved a different person.It does specifically say in the poisoning the partner article that the allegations does not involve rape or sexual assault
“There is no suggestion any rape or sexual offence took place.” So it can’t be the same person involved in that who is involved in the article that you’ve linked to
Yes it could be- different cases. It seems the 'sporting star' has other cases against him. But I don't think they are the same person for other reasons- mainly that the footballer in the star article is possibly not a household name.Theoretically it could, if it involved a different person.
She doesn't like anyone trying to steal her thunder. MH was thought up as a vehicle to make her famous again and instead, it was Derek who ended up the star and she never forgave him for it. It got worse when he said he was leaving to headline a show and that's when they came up with the plot to make him look bad and prove he was a fake. She hasn't changed either as a younger, prettier woman started appearing when they were turfed off of Living and put on one of the lower-down channels....she didn't last long.I think there was footage of Yvette slagging him off during an interval break from one of the 'Live' shows.
He had become the 'star of the show' at the time and I don't think she was happy about that!
I doubt she’s naive enough to believe he’d be faithful to her. Lots of people are happy to turn a blind eye so long as they get to maintain the lifestyle they enjoy.Completely agree
And why is it that people always think that a serial cheater won’t cheat on them??
Not necessarily. Assets accrued prior to marriage can be ring fenced and might not always be counted as matrimonial assets, especially if the marriage is relatively short. It’s not always the case of a 50/50 split, and I’d image he’ll have had considerable legal advice geared towards protecting his assets.As his wife she gets half his assets doesn’t she? When they inevitably divorce that is.
Or ‘that’s the man whose bank account I’d like access to, and procreation will certainly strengthen any future claims to that wealth’.The thing with Carrie is that despite knowing exactly what BoJo was like (his behaviour - lazy, workshy, compulsive liar, serial shagger etc was common knowledge and well documented in the Press, not just the odd rumour), she still thought ‘yeah, that’s the man I want to be the father of my children’. The mind boggles…..
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?