I just want to agree with this.Some disgusting friend of David Jasons, apparently used his house for criminal things, while he was out of the country. Having the misfortune of once knowing a paedophile, does not make you a paedophile. Guilty by association?
Having said that, I know absolutely nothing about the man really so, not saying it isnt true! I would hate to think the Police, BBC etc know all this and are just waiting for him to die before "uncovering" it. What would be keeping them quiet? Id like to hope lessons have been learnt! (and that David Jason is a wonderful man and I can continue to enjoy Only Fools and Horses )
I have a family member who is a pedofile. Hit us all like a ton of bricks when we found out. Cut him out of our lives and are still horrified by what he did. He's a vile, disgusting thing.
That DOES NOT make me guilty by association. It's not rocket science.
Honestly, think before you type. There are real people participating in this thread.
Common sense right here!My doubt is more about why on Earth it would not only be covered up, but also why the BBC would continue to work with him.
If the police have a file on him, that any old fella in the Met has been able to have a look at then why the f**k haven't they arrested him, charged him and convicted him?
As other people have spoken about this incident where his house sitters used his home for dodgy things, I think it's more likely that there was a file which identified his home and they were able to rule his involvement out.
If anyone is able to explain how and why DJ has been able to suppress legal action and also continue to be employed, I would love to hear from them.
Jesus, some people here are incredibly frustrating. How would these "guilty by association" people feel if someone in their family / friend circle was arrested and you were declared guilty by association?
Gossip by all means, but this guilty by association crap is disgraceful.