I think it's this one here: https://www.superdrug.com/Skin/Face...rug-Simply-Pure-Hydrating-Serum-50ml/p/342700Btw what is the Superdrug £2.99 serum dupe please?!
Yeah, that’s the one. If I were you, I would try hada Labo. You get a large bottle for £15 from Amazon. It’s pretty great.I think it's this one here: https://www.superdrug.com/Skin/Face...rug-Simply-Pure-Hydrating-Serum-50ml/p/342700
It was brilliant when it had the blue lid. Then they changed the formula and it wasn't as good as before.
Proper belly laugh.Wow. That’s bold even for Sali ‘Mean Streets’ Hughes. I wonder where she keeps her blade? In her Scamp & Dude grab bag probably
What have I started? It was just a made up example, but the Simply Pure night serum is good value.Btw what is the Superdrug £2.99 serum dupe please?!
My guess is she was removed'Real women support real women' appears to have left. Was it something we said?
She tries legal action, she’ll inadvertently just direct lots of people over here - and she can’t afford that.I assume if any of us get sued then we will have a whip round for the legal fees and all attend court every day for the landmark ruling. Hughes Vs The People.
In which an influencer faces consequences for trying to control the internet.
Then we will write a screenplay about it and become famous and become influencers and get our own blue ticks! And we will do paid partnerships at that salon all the best people go to! And WE WILL CONTROL THE WOMEN!
have I said too much? Is my jealousy peeking out again? Damnit I just can’t control myself
What would she have been removed for? I’d quite like an actual conversation with the ‘other side’ to see what exactly is so awful on here. But removing a different point of view seems a bit weird.My guess is she was removed
*conspiracyface*
The point is, if you come here and say, "Look, I'm a fan and I don't think she's done anything wrong, why do you think that?" is one thing.What would she have been removed for? I’d quite like an actual conversation with the ‘other side’ to see what exactly is so awful on here. But removing a different point of view seems a bit weird.
I guess she was guilty of the same kind of trolling we have been accused of. Sadly, when they begin posting with an attack before having read and engaged with the evidence, it’s clear that they are not interested in an actual conversation.What would she have been removed for? I’d quite like an actual conversation with the ‘other side’ to see what exactly is so awful on here. But removing a different point of view seems a bit weird.
Yes, love this! Was just thinking this morning, couldn't darling India arrange to send Phil off of Enders round instead? I know he's a bit of a ginger but I prefer that gravelly gangsta accentI bet there is a lot of teeth gnashing and hissy fitting going on behind the scenes at the SH journalist services and dog walking Co. I honestly think she thought this would shrivel up and fade away after her legal advice and of course threats from Phil Mitchell wannabe, EJ.
She already has. I'd never heard of this site until she boo-hoo'd on her insta...She tries legal action, she’ll inadvertently just direct lots of people over here - and she can’t afford that.
I'm a celeb, innit babes? Well known pond scum, go me!I guess she was guilty of the same kind of trolling we have been accused of. Sadly, when they begin posting with an attack before having read and engaged with the evidence, it’s clear that they are not interested in an actual conversation.
@BettyDoodah - I am loving how, despite having only joined up on Saturday, you are already considered a “well-known” member! I’ve been here since August!!!
Same here. Have had my eyes well & truly openedShe already has. I'd never heard of this site until she boo-hoo'd on her insta...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?